What if the question isn't 'How do we prevent cheating with AI?' but 'How do we create learning so engaging that students want to do their own thinking?'
Where is the line between collaboration and cheating if we replace 'AI' with 'friend', 'peer', 'tutor' or 'parent'?
When we spend time authenticating student work, what learning opportunities might we be missing?
"What is the cognitive process that a student goes through that they reach a point that they make a conscious decision to engage in a behavior that can compromise their learning or may be detrimental to their learning. There's something that's missing that we call "cheating" that I would say something happened along the way that now it's okay I'm willing to sacrifice a long term benefit of this learning for a short term gain." - Ken Shelton
From his keynote, "Reimagining Learning with AI: Becoming a Literate, Ethical, and Impact Leader in the Age of AI"