IEEE ICRA 2026 Full-Day Workshop (June 5th, 2026)
Vienna, Austria
What inspires robot design? For standardized tasks, conventional morphologies such as multi-degree-of-freedom robot arms or quadcopters have emerged as reliable, widely commercialized solutions. In parallel, bio-inspiration has led to humanoid and zoomorphic platforms that mimic the capabilities of living systems. Yet, between these two sources of inspiration lies an expansive and underexplored design space, filled with novel morphologies that do not fit neatly within either an industrial or biological analogy. These unconventional robots promise resilience in complex, unstructured environments and new opportunities across domains, ranging from exploratory systems for space and Earth sciences, to modular platforms for industry, to soft robots for medicine and human interaction.
Building on the success of our previous workshops at ICRA 2024 and ICRA 2025, the 3rd Unconventional Robots Workshop will provide a platform to ask: How can we create systematic approaches for designing, manufacturing, and modeling complex robotic systems? How can embodied intelligence be integrated into design and control? What strategies can advance unconventional systems from laboratories to real-world applications? And how might unconventional and traditional robots coexist in the future? The challenge is not only in conceiving these robots but also in developing the mechanisms, models, and control strategies that can transform them from “unconventional” curiosities into practical, deployable solutions.
To push these discussions further, this year’s workshop introduces a structured debate on control versus morphology, asking whether advances in algorithms or innovations in physical design contribute more towards robotic capability. By presenting multiple viewpoints, the debate will illuminate trade-offs, synergies, and open research questions surrounding control and morphology. The debate brings participants' expert perspectives that can help guide future research and inspire hybrid approaches to robot design.
Submission Link: https://forms.gle/psUa7vAvT3WwzUtX7
Meeting Room: TBD
09:00 - 09:10 Opening Remarks and Keynote
09:10 - 09:40 Speaker 1 (30 minutes)
09:40 - 10:10 Speaker 2 (30 minutes)
10:10 - 10:25 Early Career Talk 1 (Postdocs/ PhDs participants)
10:30 - 11:00 Morning Break
11:00 - 11:30 Speaker 3 (30 minutes)
11:30 - 11:45 Early Career Talk 2 (Postdocs/ PhDs participants)
11:45 - 12:30 Debate (45 minutes)
12:30 - 13:00 Lightning Talks (Student participants)
13:00 - 13:30 Coffee Break (Optional)
13:30 - 13:45 Early Career Talk 3 (Postdocs/ PhDs participants)
13:45 - 14:00 Early Career Talk 4 (Postdocs/ PhDs participants)
14:00 - 14:30 Speaker 4 (30 minutes)
14:30 - 15:00 Panel Discussion (Among speakers and participants)
15:00 - 15:30 Speaker 5 (30 minutes)
15:30 - 16:00 Afternoon Break (Optional)
16:00 - 16:15 Startup Speaker 1 (15 minutes)
16:15 - 16:30 Startup Speaker 2 (15 minutes)
16:30 - 16:45 Closing Remarks
This session will explore a central question in unconventional robotic design: the relative roles of control and morphology in achieving novel and useful designs. Proponents of advanced control approaches emphasize the importance of algorithms, feedback mechanisms, and machine learning in enabling robots to adapt to complex and unpredictable environments. Conversely, advocates of morphological design highlight the potential of passive dynamics, intrinsic stability, and carefully engineered structures to reduce reliance on external control.
Fundamental questions include:
To what extent can morphology substitute for control and vice versa?
Which contributes more to innovative designs: sophisticated control architectures or clever mechanical design?
Should future robots prioritize intrinsic stability, as seen in passive walkers, or extrinsic stabilization through sensing and feedback?
By articulating arguments on both sides, this debate will illuminate the trade-offs and complementarities that shape the design of robust, capable robotic systems.
Shashwat Singh, Carnegie Mellon University
Naomi Oke, Carnegie Mellon University
Audra Smith, University at Buffalo
Chaerim Moon, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Dr. Robert Baines, ETH Zurich
Dr. Zeynep Temel, Carnegie Mellon University
Dr. Aaron Johnson, Carnegie Mellon University
Dr. Ryan St. Pierre, University at Buffalo
Dr. Justin Yim, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Dr. Lillian Chin, University of Texas at Austin
Dr. Yong-Lae Park, Seoul National University