The UAF School of Education Initial Teaching Licensure Programs (Elementary, Music Education, Secondary & Special Education), and the Advanced Special Education Program hold national accreditation through the Council for the Accreditation of Education Preparation (CAEP).
The impact of our graduates on their P-12 students is studied through a robust case study every other year. Case studies of graduate effectiveness and impact have been completed in 2018, 2020, 2022, and 2024. The case study utilizes focus groups, observations, an assessment task for teachers to analyze student learning, and district documentation when available. To ensure a representative sample, each case study has highlighted a different population of graduates.
The 2024 case study focused on Secondary Program graduates. Six graduates agreed to partake in the case study. One was a graduate in spring 2022 and five were graduates in 2023. The six participants, at the time of data collection, were teaching in four different Alaskan school districts, two of which were in rural (off-road system) areas of Alaska and two of which are in large urban districts serving diverse populations. Click the link below for an excerpt from the 2024 case study showcasing completer effectiveness and impact data.
A link to the 2024 Case Study Impact on Student Learning
The next Case Study IRB exemption was approved in Spring 2026 for a study looking at graduate effectiveness and impact across the Elementary, Secondary, and Special Education programs to take place in AY26/27.
The UAF School of Education measures satisfaction of employers through a supervisor survey developed by the Network for Excellence in Teaching (NExT). The NExT Supervisor Survey, now an open-source survey, is administered every spring. It asks employers of teachers who graduated from UAF School of Education teaching licensure programs in the prior academic year (Initial and Advanced) to rate new teacher preparedness across a series of skills.
The NExT Surveys group teacher skills into 4 domains: Instructional Practice (based on 21 skills), Diverse Learners (based on 9 skills), Learning Environment (based on 9 skills), and Professionalism (based on 6 skills). Across these domains, the majority of responding supervisors report satisfaction with new teacher performance, and with the performance of newly endorsed Special Education teachers. Below in Figure 1 are the spring 2025 NExT Supervisor Survey results regarding 2023/24 alumni (2024/25 first year teachers) from Elementary, Secondary, and Special Education programs.
In addition to soliciting feedback through surveys, the UAF School of Education hosts program specific External Advisory Committees (EACs) to gather focused feedback on the Elementary, Secondary, and Special Education programs to ensure programs continue to meet district needs. Each EAC meets two times a year. Membership represents school districts from Fairbanks, Southcentral Alaska, and rural communities. Members include recent alumni, mentor teachers, and administrators. See the lists below for topics and actionable items from EAC meetings in AY2024/25.
Brainstormed ideas for elementary education candidates to practice supporting Special Education students in the classroom which led to increased collaboration between Elementary and Special Education faculty.
Completed a review of the UAF SOE Professional Characteristic Form to see if the disposition assessment is still meeting current district needs.
Continued conversations about AI use in secondary classrooms.
Discussed cell phone policies in secondary classrooms.
Brainstormed recruitment strategies and ways to support new teachers to connect to communities and institutional knowledge.
Gathered input to update the UAF SOE Professional Characteristic Form.
Shared information on the new Special Education minor and the grant partnership to support paraprofessionals into certified Special Educator positions.
Asked EAC members for ideas on who else may want to serve on the Special Education EAC to increase statewide representation.
Collaborative review of the UAF SOE Professional Characteristic Form for any necessary updates to meet the needs of the field.
Candidates in their final semester of their program are actively involved in student teaching. To assess candidate skills and dispositions in the classroom, both initial and advanced candidates complete three culminating assessments which are shared across programs. Candidates must meet a proficient level in each shared assessment in order to be recommended for licensure. The three culminating assessments are described below.
ATCAT: Alaska Teacher Culminating Assessment Task, created by the UAF School of Education - The ATCAT assesses candidate planning, instruction, assessment, and reflection on practice. Candidates submit lesson plans, video of instruction, analysis of assessment data, and reflections on practice. University faculty complete the assessment. Candidates must score at the proficient with revisions level or higher to pass the assessment. Candidates are given the opportunity to revise at least once if expectations are rated underdeveloped in any area.
STOT: Skills of Teaching Observation Tool, created by North Dakota Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (NDACTE) - District employed Mentor Teachers and University Supervisors use the STOT formatively at several stages of the candidate’s internship before completing a final observation during the candidate’s final semester to document field observations. The STOT consists of 34 InTASC aligned items assessing the candidate’s content knowledge, knowledge of learning differences, instructional practice, and professionalism. Candidates may not have more than 4 skills rated at an emergent level or below by the completion of their student teaching.
PCF: Professional Characteristics Form, created by the UAF School of Education - University faculty, University Supervisors, and district Mentor Teachers complete PCFs throughout candidates’ coursework and field work experiences. In the final semester, candidate dispositions in the fieldwork setting are assessed with a PCF by the University Supervisor and district Mentor Teacher. Candidates must consistently score at a proficient level or above across the 6 criteria of the PCF.
The UAF School of Education looked at average scores in the final semester across the three shared culminating assessments for each graduating candidate across all teaching licensure programs (See Figure 2 below). Each assessment is scored on a scale of 1-Underdeveloped to 4-Distinguished. A score of 3 is considered proficient. The majority of all candidates across programs were assessed at a proficient level.