Economics & policy media
Economics and policy media
- Freakonomics Radio. Fun, quirky takes on economic thinking.
- Economist's View. A broad-ranging survey of economic writing online.
- VoxEU. Readable versions of important or novel recent research.
- IZA World of Labor. Similar to VoxEU, but focused on labor economics.
- Energy Institute at Haas (UC Berkeley) blog. Posts on energy and climate policy from top economists.
- Capitalisn't. An economics podcast featuring Luigi Zingales (Chicago Booth) and Kate Waldock (Georgetown).
- Conversations with Tyler. Economist Tyler Cowen (George Mason) asks unusual, useful questions. Both academic and non-academic guests are included. While the podcast is produced by the Mercatus Center, I have not noticed a particularly libertarian slant.
- Vox. In addition to their policy-focused articles, I recommend their podcasts, The Weeds and The Ezra Klein Show. Klein's interview with Cal Newport, on the topic of focused work, is particularly good.
Books on economics, applied statistics, and mathematics
- The Undercover Economist, Tim Harford
- The Drunkard's Walk, Leonard Mlodinow
- The Signal and the Noise, Nate Silver
- The Ghost Map, Steven Johnson
- Democracy in Chains, Nancy MacLean
- Flash Boys, Michael Lewis
- The Music of the Primes, Marcus du Sautoy
- The Book of Why, Judea Pearl. This excellent book includes my favorite discussion of the Monty Hall problem, with two helpful explanations. One requires Pearl's causal diagrams and is best read in context. The second, Bayesian explanation is worth quoting here: "...how come your belief in Door 2 has gone up from one-third to two-thirds? The answer is that Monty could not open Door 1 after you chose it--but he could have opened Door 2. The fact that he did not makes it more likely that he opened Door 3 because he was forced to. Thus there is more evidence than before that the car is behind Door 2. This is a general theme of Bayesian analysis: any hypothesis that has survived some test that threatens its validity becomes more likely. ... Door 2 was vulnerable to refutation (i.e., Monty could have opened it), but Door 1 was not. Therefore, Door 2 becomes a more likely location, while Door 1 does not. The probability that the car is behind Door 1 remains one in three."
- In Our Time, BBC Radio 4. A wonderful discussion program ranging from history and literature to mathematics and science.