Class notes:
Introduction to MATH123 Mathematics and Politics, covering
Why this class?
What this class is about
Quantitative literacy in politics
Goals of the class
Topics we will try to cover
Other materials:
There are no additional materials for this class meeting.
Class notes:
Electoral College, covering
What is the Electoral College?
2016 presidential elections
Popular vs. electoral vote
Big vs. small states and the “+2 effect”
Alternatives to the Electoral College
Other materials:
More details about the Electoral College.
A video explaining the Electoral College.
Article on the history of the Electoral College and some ways to fix it.
Here is a site that encodes the difference between the popular votes and the electoral college votes for presidential elections since 1972.
Under very reasonable assumptions, all you need is 23% of the popular vote to win the Electoral College! Here is how.
Crazy example of the popular vote gone wrong in the UK elections.
More on the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
Could the Civil War have been avoided if Borda count was used?
Class notes:
Majority vote, covering
Simple majority and supermajority
Near-decisiveness
Quota method
Parity, monarchy, dictatorship methods
Anonymity, neutrality, monotonicity properties
May's Theorem
Plurality vote, covering
Plurality method
Vote splitting (2016 Republican primaries, 1998 Minnesota gubernatorial race)
Spoiler effect (2000 presidential race)
Runoff election
Ranked choice voting methods, covering
Instant runoff
Borda count
Condorcet method
An example using all the methods, covering
An example with a single profile producing six different outcomes depending on the method
The problem of extracting group preferences from individual preferences
The rise of social choice theory
Some strange examples, covering
Various counterintuitive and paradoxical voting outcomes such as
Condorcet paradox
Paradox of positive association
Failure of the majority criterion
Failure of independence of irrelevant alternatives (featuring the 1995 Figure Skating World Championship)
Desirable voting method properties, covering
Anonymity, neutrality, monotonicity, majority, and non-dictatorship criteria (all of which we already saw)
Condorcet Criterion
Pareto Criterion
Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives
Methods we have seen that do and do not satisfy these criteria
Arrow Impossibility Theorem, covering
Arrow Impossibility and interpretation
Outline of proof
Gibbard-Satterthwaite Theorem
Now what?
Cardinal methods, covering
Ordinal vs cardinal methods
Approval voting
Range voting
Cumulative voting
Electing more than one candidate, covering
Discrete cumulative voting
Single transferable vote
Class vote on Super Tuesday, covering
Our votes on the Democratic candidates, tallied in eight different ways. (Spoiler: Warren won most of the time!)
Other materials:
Good summary of problems with plurality voting, some of which we talked about in class.
More on Duverger’s Law.
More on the center-squeeze effect.
Crazy example of vote splitting in a recent election in Massachusetts.
Crazy example of voting results in the UK.
More examples of vote splitting/spoiler effect. And here are some more.
A video introducing various voting methods and the Condorcet paradox.
Crazy/fun election facts from around the world. And some more. And some more.
Some strange ways in which ties are broken in the U.S.
Advocates of various voting methods: Instant runoff, range voting, approval voting, cumulative voting.
An interactive guide to the voting methods we’ve seen (and then some). And here is a more condensed version.
Another interactive visual guide to voting.
Summary of ranked voting methods and where they are used.
Video explaining the Arrow Impossibility Theorem and outlining its proof.
More formal treatment of the Arrow Impossibility Theorem.
Proof of the Impossibility Theorem.
Arrow's original paper on the Impossibility Theorem.
More on the Gibbart-Satterthwaite Theorem, and here is a proof.
More on discrete cumulative voting.
More on single transferable vote. And a video explaining it.
Jusr in time for our class Super Tuesday vote, here is an article from the New York Times arguing for instant runoff in primaries.
Class notes:
Hamilton apportionment method, covering
apportionment problem
Hamilton apportionment method
Alabama paradox
New states paradox
Population paradox
Other apportionment methods, covering
Jefferson method
Adams method
Webster method
Dean method
Huntington-Hill method
Apportionment criteria and the Balinski-Young Theorem, covering
Quota rule
Neutrality
Balinski-Young Theorem
Other materials:
History and legislation of apportionment in the U.S. by the Census Bureau
Apportionment around the world
Apportionment in the European Parliament
Series of lectures on apportionment, voting, and gerrymandering by Michel Balinski (of the Balinski-Young Theorem)
Class notes and videos:
Weighted voting
Video summary of what we did in class (we transitioned to online instruction after this class, so this video is intended to remind you what happened in that class)
Topics covered:
Weighted voting
Electoral College revisited
UN Security Council as a weighted voting system
U.S. legislative system
Taylor-Zwicker Theorem
1991 U.S. Senate and the power of Jim Jeffords
Examples illustrating the importance of vote distribution
Banzhaf Power Index
Lecture videos: Banzhaf power 1, Banzhaf power 2, Banzhaf power 3
Topics covered:
Banzhaf Power Index
Power in the European Economic Community
Power in the Electoral College
Shapley-Shubik Power Index
Lecture videos: Shapley-Shubik power 1, Shapley-Shubik power 2
Topics covered:
Shapley-Shubik Power Index
Power of the U.S. President
Calculating the power indices of the UN Security Council
Other materials:
More on John Banzhaf, with links to materials on the Banzhaf power index.
Calculator that computes the Banzhaf power index of any weighted voting system.
More on the Shapley-Shubik power index. And here is another document that explains it and works out some example.
Class notes and video:
Introduction to gerrymandering
Covering
Why gerrymandering is sometimes good
Recent examples of bad gerrymandering
Racial v. political gerrymandering
Gerrymandering in the courts
Efficiency gap
Covering
Packing and cracking
Stacking, hijacking, and kidnapping
Wasted votes and the efficiency gap
Problems with the efficiency gap
Geometry of gerrymandering
Lecture video (access password: d2?@$m6@)
Covering
Isoperimetric Inequality
Polsby-Popper compactness score
Schwartzberg, Reock, convex hull, length-width, X-symmetry scores
Problem with compactness scores and possible solutions
Other materials:
An article about some of the most gerrymandered districts.
An article about the "Goofy kicking Donald Duck" district".
Metric Geometry and Gerrymandering Group, a collection of cool people trying to use geometry and computing to counter gerrymandering in a rigorous way. And a talk on the mathematics of gerrymandering by its founder, Prof. Moon Duchin from Tufts.
An article explaining the latest Supreme Court decision against challenges to gerrymandering.
The original article introducing the efficiency gap.
More on the efficiency gap, and on some of its flaws. And a more technical paper on its flaws. And another paper about its flaws.
Atlas or redistricting, an interactive site where you can play with gerrymandering.
More on the Isoperimetric Inequality.
An article summarizing various geometric criteria for checking gerrymandering.
An article laying out issues with compactness scores.
Class notes and videos:
Covering
Brief history of cryptography
Public key cryptography
Diffie-Hellman and RSA
Issues of cryptography and privacy
Regulation of cryptography vs. civil liberties
First Crypto Wars
Snowden revelations and cryptography
Cryptography as dual-use technology
Other materials:
Fun clip from the show Silicon Valley.
An article on Crypto War II.
About backdoors, and a backdoor in a random number generator.
Recent article about the continuing attempts at regulation of cryptography.
Links to many more materials (from a cryptography class I am currently teaching).
Class notes and video:
Covering
Basic ways of the misuse of statistics for political purposes
Examples of faulty visualisations, misuses of large numbers, cherry picking, etc.
Other materials:
Summary of some common misuses of statistics.
Examples of misleading graphs.
Some hilarious correlations (we showed some of these in class).
An oganization trying to improve statistical literacy.
An article about the growing mistrust in statistics.
A video about the misuses of statistics. And another one.
Notes including some final thoughts, covering
a reminder of why we must insist on political quantitative literacy
a list of topics we would cover if we had an infinite amount of time, such as
Basics of social choice and game theory: fairness, conflict, bargaining, prisoner's dilemma, ...
Strategic voting
Revisiting some earlier topics using the language of social choice functions
Proofs of Arrow, Gibbard-Satterthwaite, and Balinski-Young Theorems
Nash Equilibrium
Median Voter Theorem
McKelvey-Schofield Chaos Theorem
More geometry of gerrymandering, closer look at compactness scores
More math behind some basic cryptosystems, more on the politics of privacy
More statistics in politics: methods, misuses, polling, ...
Bias of mathematical models
Graph theory of social networks and voter manipulation
Quantitative literacy and political bias
Political quantitive literacy in K-12 education
High-powered math in voting: representation theory, category theory, combinatorial topology, ...
And so much more...