Figure 1: Big Ear simulation showing the flux curves for four modeled radio sources. The animation illustrates how the telescope operated by combining signals from its two beams (red and blue) through subtraction to produce the expected observed flux (black curve). The beam pattern is derived from a two-dimensional sinc function, resulting in the visible sidelobes in the plot. The horn rectangles indicate the FWHM in right ascension and declination. The beam response, however, extends beyond these bounds, and the null-to-null width is roughly 2.3Ă— the FWHM. The integration time of this sample (also referred to as the time constant) is 3 s, matching the value used for the paper strip-chart output. However, the digital data were recorded at 10-second intervals. Credit: Arecibo Wow!
Figure 2: Same as Figure 1, but with added noise consistent with the strip chart output (~55 mJy) and superposed random RFI, which is largely canceled by the observed signal after the subtraction of the negative from the positive horn. Credit: Arecibo Wow!
Figure 3: Simulation of the flux curve for a field containing numerous weak radio sources (< 0.8 Jy) from the NVSS catalog. The predicted flux (black curve) matches the observed data (green points) remarkably well in this region. Applying this same procedure to the whole Big Ear dataset will enhance the detection of new signals and improve our ability to distinguish between RFI and true astrophysical sources. Credit: Arecibo Wow!