Tuffree Law

Welcome to our Tuffree Law Club Webpage!!

Check here periodically for club meeting information and resources!!

Meetings are held Mondays from 3:35pm-4:30pm in my room (602)! Our club will be active from November through April.

Please fill out the form below, and then scroll further for a meeting summaries.

Monday 11/8 First Meeting!

• Meet Mrs. Cav and Mrs. Schultz

• Fill out the Tuffree Law Information Form above

• Make name tents

• Discuss the TLC expectations, time commitment, schedule

• Practice public speaking with "Confidence Arguments" role play

Meeting Notes

Our first meeting was so much fun!! It was great to have such a big group join us today =) Please remember to fill out the Google Form above if you have not done so already.

Here are our meeting dates through January 2022! We will schedule more meetings after the start of the new year!

• December 6

• December 13

• January 10

• January 24

Monday 12/6 Agenda

• Holiday Hypotheticals

• People vs. Thor Ordison

Meeting Notes

Our second meeting was excellent! We had fun with holiday hypotheticals by defending a claim based on holiday movies. For the rest of the period, we worked on creating arguments for People vs Thor Ordison. This was a handout given out during the meeting. Please print it out, read it over and fill out the notes/questions/comments/thoughts section the best you can. Here is a list of our upcoming meetings!

• December 13

• January 10

• January 24

Meeting 12/13 Agenda

• Thor vs Odinson Elements Arguments

Prosecution:

• • In order to convict Mr. Odinson of criminal threats, the People must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that [language from the element you’ve selected]. [Review/argument of evidence that supports your position]. Therefore, the people have met our burden and satisfied this element.

Defense:

• • In order to convict Mr. Odinson of criminal threats, the People must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that [language from the element you’ve selected]. However, [Review/argument of evidence that creates doubt about this point]. This creates reasonable doubt. Therefore, the people have not met their burden and Thor Odinson should be found not guilty.

Meeting Notes

In today's meeting, we wrote arguments for our Thor vs Mr. Odinson based on the prompts above. Next, we shared aloud our arguments and discussed the merits of each side. Our next meeting is January 10th =)

Meeting 1/10/2022 Agenda

Epic vs L&P Case Arguments as they relate to the Sleekcraft Factors.

Meeting Notes

We discussed the Epic vs L&P Case Arguments as they relate to the Sleekcraft Factors. If you need a these handouts, please see Mrs. Schultz.

Our next meeting will be Monday 1/24.

Meeting 1/24 Agenda

Further discuss arguments for Epic vs L&P and receive new case packet.

Meeting Notes

We received our new case packet: U.S. vs Adams. Please review the case packet and be ready to discuss at our next meeting on Monday 1/31.

Meeting Agenda 1/31

Discuss our new case U.S. vs Adams. Our next meetings will be 2/7 & 2/28.

Meeting Agenda 2/7

Discuss our new case U.S. vs Adams. Our next meetings will be 2/28!

Meeting Notes:

We further discussed both sides of our new case. If you missed this meeting, please see Mrs. Schultz