The Story of Indian Philosophy

PHIL 451

Description | Schedule

Study Helps & Philosophy Links

Spring 2024

1:50-2:50 Monday-Wednesday-Friday

John R. Howard Hall, Room 202

Email: fritzman@lclark.edu

Class Email: 24sp-phil-451-01@lclark.edu

Office: John R. Howard Hall, Room 223

Office Hours:

Office meetings, no appointment needed:
8:30-12:00 Monday-Wednesday-Friday,
3:00-4:00 Monday.

Zoom meetings, by appointment:
Tuesday-Thursday at
https://zoom.us/j/3469350737

COURSE DESCRIPTION

Rainer Maria Rilke (as quoted by J. M. Coetzee): "We are born, so to speak, provisionally, it doesn’t matter where; it is only gradually that we compose, within ourselves, our true place of origin, so that we may be born there retrospectively."

Here is the required text:

Ganeri, Jonardon. 2017. The Oxford Handbook of Indian Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

The Oxford Handbook of Indian Philosophy is available online through the Watzek Library. It is available in print at Amazon.com and Barnes & Noble.

Download a free copy of Microsoft's Office 365 Education—which includes Word, Excel, PowerPoint, OneNote, and Teams—at https://products.office.com/en-us/student/office-in-education.

All material must be submitted as a Microsoft docx file. No other format—such as PDFs, Google docs, or pages—is acceptable.

In this course, we will study Indian philosophy. There are also learning outcomes for students who graduate with a major in Philosophy.

Presenting your Assessment (which is a draft of your Argumentative Research Paper) in class and then responding to questions are learning outcomes of this course.

In preparation for each class meeting, you should have read the assigned material. You should arrive in class with prepared questions or comments about something in the assigned reading.

A major goal of this course is to cultivate intellectual abilities which have general application. This course aims to provide the resources which will enable you to develop intellectual survival skills, question what passes as common knowledge and accepted wisdom, evaluate your own and others' positions, and formulate new ideas. Such skills consist in the ability to summarize the assigned material, and to write pieces in which ideas and arguments are articulated, criticized, defended. Such skills also involve developing the ability to think critically about the views of ourselves and others. Critical thinking consists in understanding several sides of a debate, and seeing both the advantages and limitations of an opinion. Learning to question your opinions is as crucial as arguing for them. If you only learn to give reasons for opinions already held, you merely are giving rationalizations for prejudices. You need to learn to think for yourself, developing, defending, and criticizing your beliefs.

In this connection, I am especially concerned that you develop the ability to discuss issues cogently and to write intelligent, reflective pieces in clear, grammatical English. It is important that you learn to think, in a disciplined way, about the books and issues they raise. Part of that discipline consists in being able to analyze, evaluate, and formulate arguments. This involves knowing how to identify basic assumptions, develop a line of reasoning, recognize the steps that lead to a conclusion, and determine whether an argument is sound. In this way, hopefully, you will develop intellectual curiosity and the competencies to reason logically, evaluate critically, communicate effectively, imagine creatively, and appreciate aesthetic and creative expressions of humanity.

You are encouraged to share your questions and observations with the rest of the class, and to engage critically with the material, myself, and each other. By participating in class discussions, you will encounter directly differing interpretations of the material, become aware of the history of these views, and be encouraged to develop your own critical perspectives. In interacting with the material and each other, you will acquire a knowledge and appreciation of self, society, human cultures, and the natural world. I intend that you discover what has been written and said concerning, in the words of Socrates, "the most important things"—questions about human character and the conduct of life. Such skills will enable you to succeed in subsequent courses and in endeavors outside of the classroom. Those abilities also will contribute to your development as educated citizens in a democratic society.

You will write a Précis for almost every reading assignment and complete various Research Exercises that teach research skills. There will be one Argumentative Research Project that includes a Prospectus, an Assessment (which is draft of the Argumentative Research Paper that is presented in class), and a Final Rewrite.

The Précis, Research Exercises, and Class Participation will be weighted together and will count for 10% of your final grade, the Prospectus will count for 5%, the Assessment will count for 25%, and the Final Rewrite will count for 60%.

The final version of your Argumentative Research Paper must be a significant revision of your Assessment, responding to my suggestions and comments.

The grading scale is as follows:

A = 93%-100%
A- = 90%-92%
B+ = 86%-89%
B = 83% 85%
B- = 80%-82%
C+ = 76%-79%
C = 73%-75%
C- = 70%-72%
D+ = 66%-69%
D = 60%-65%
F = 0%-59%.

A Précis will be due almost every class session. Each précis will be one side of one typed page—never longer—double-spaced, with 1 inch margins on the right & left sides and the top & bottom. It must be at least 3/4 of a page in length. Use a 12-point Times or Times Roman font. There will be no spelling or grammatical errors in your précis. Your name will be typed in the upper right-hand corner. In each précis, you will summarize—in your own words, without using any quotes—the assigned reading's main claims, as well as the reasons which are given to support those claims. You will not include any opinion, evaluation, or commentary. At the bottom of each précis, or on the back, you will type one question that you have about the reading. This question must written prior to, not during, class.

The Assessment is a draft of the Argumentative Research Paper that is presented in classs.  It must be approximately 3000 words, typed, double-spaced

The Argumentative Research Paper must be approximately 3000 words, typed, double-spaced.

To receive credit, the Assessment and Argumentative Research Paper must each be at least 2900 words.

It is crucial that you critically engage with the material. You might argue that a claim that an author makes is incorrect, for example, or that a criticism in the secondary literature is incorrect. Alternatively, you might argue that an interpretation advanced in the secondary literature is incorrect. Your paper must reflect an acquaintance with the secondary literature.

Watzek Library is an essential resource for the work you will do in this couse.  Jim Bunnelle, the librarian for Philosophy, can help you throughout your research process. You can arrange a one-on-one appointment with Jim by emailing him at bunnelle@lclark.edu. You may also want to explore the Datebase and Reference Resources on the Philosophy subject guide for https://library.lclark.edu/philosophy.

The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, and Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy will be useful.

The Philosopher's Index will be vital for the Assessment and Argumentative Research Paper.

The Chicago Manual of Style's Citation Quick Guide is online.

You're welcome to consult the Writing Center, located on the main floor of Watzek Library.

Also useful is the Online Writing Lab (OWL) at Purdue University.

If you would find it useful to create concept maps, to help write your assessment or argumentative research papers, you can download the software to create them from IHMC Cmap Tools.

All work must be submitted when it is due. Late work will not be accepted and will receive no credit.

I will not accept late précis.  You may be excuse from three précis.

However, your final grade for the course will be lowered by a full-letter grade if you do not submit four précis when they are due, the final grade will be lowered by two full-letter grades if you do not submit five précis when they are due, and you will be fail the course if you do not submit six précis when they are due.

This class will be successful only if there is a high degree of participation and attendance. Further, you will partially transition from being a student who only consumes knowledge to a scholar who also produces knowledge.  So, you must be in class participating.

Your final grade for the course will be lowered by a full-letter grade if you have three unexcused absences, the final grade will be lowered by two full-letter grades if you  have four unexcused absences, and you will receive an F for the course from the course if you have five unexcused absences.

Your final grade for the course will be lowered by a full-letter grade if you miss four class sessions, the final grade will be lowered by two full-letter grades if you miss five class sessions, and you will be fail the course if you miss six or more class sessions.

You may not arrive late to class. You will not be admitted if you are late and that will count as an absence.

You should be prepared to remain in class for the entire hour. Although there may be an occasion when there is a legitimate need to leave during class, this should happen only rarely. If you have to leave, you must minimize any disruption.

If you experience emergent health issues, mental or physical, communicate with me before class.

Serious illnesses and emergencies will be dealt with on a case-by-case basis.

Prior to class, you must power down your phones and other electronic devises.

You may use a computer during class only for work that is directly related to the course.

Throughout the course you are expected to read carefully the assigned material. It is impossible to do well in this course without reading and studying the books. You should spend a minimum of three hours preparing for each class session. Read the assigned material at least twice and take notes on what you read. You are expected to attend all class sessions, come to class having read thoroughly the assigned material, and to contribute to the discussions.

Gorgias of Leontini maintained that "those who neglect philosophy and spend their time on ordinary studies are like the suitors who desired Penelope but slept with her maids."  In philosophy, unlike ordinary studies, there are few right and wrong answers. There are better and worse arguments and ideas, however, usually in direct proportion to thoughtfulness and care. What is important is that you think for yourself, and that you develop and defend your own ideas. It would be an excellent idea to write drafts or outlines of your papers, and to have a comrade read them to check on spelling, grammar, development of arguments, and so forth.

You are strongly encouraged to discuss the class material, your ideas, your puzzles and difficulties with each other. A word to the wise: Find a study partner to discuss things with outside of class.

There's a Bollwood tune for every occasion. Click here.

When it comes to writing, though, do your own. That is the only way you will get the full benefit of your own efforts. I will be happy to discuss ideas with you, read outlines and rough drafts, and so forth. That is partly why I keep office hours.

A final word to the wise. It is not difficult to do well in this class, but it also is easy to do badly. Let me talk about the bad stuff first. You will receive a major grade reduction—or fail this course—if you do not read the material, seldom participate in class discussions, do not write your assessment or argumentative research paper, plagiarize, cheat, and so forth.

About plagiarizing and cheating.  You must follow Lewis & Clark College's Academic Integrity Policy. You may never use ChatGPTor any other artificial intelligence or chatbot. If you plagiarize, cheat, or use AI, you will receive an "F" for the entire course (you will not be allowed to drop or withdraw from the course). I also will turn your case over to the Honor Board; I will recommend that disciplinary penalties be assessed. It is never in your interest to plagiarize or cheat!

Now for the good stuff. With a concerted effort, you will do well in this class. To do well, you must participate in class discussions, read and study the assigned material, write the assessment and argumentative research paper, be in class (almost) all of the time, etc. I do not grade on a curve, and so there is no good reason why you should not get an "A" for the course!

Academic Support and Resources is the one-stop website for academic support offices. It has links to resources for Research and Writing, Advising and Accommodations, the Career Center, and Tutoring.

The Writing Center is available for remote consultations on Zoom all semester. There are two ways to work with the Center:

Drop in Peer Tutoring. Tutoring hours will be 3:00-10:00 PM on Sundays-Thursdays. No appointment is needed—just sign in through the website and you can usually see a tutor right away.

Appointments with the Director. You can book consultation appointments with John Holzwarth throughout the semester. Appointments are often available on short notice.

Course policy on disability accommodation. If you have a disability or learning difference that may impact your academic performance, you should request accommodations by submitting documentation to The Office of Student Accessibility. They will notify me of any accommodations for which you are eligible.

COURSE SCHEDULE

Oscar Wilde: "It seems to me that with the development of the critical spirit we shall be able to realise, not merely our own lives, but the collective life of the race, and so to make ourselves absolutely modern, in the true meaning of the word modernity. For he [sic] to whom the present is the only thing that is present, knows nothing of the age in which he [sic] lives. To realise the nineteenth century, one must realise every century that has preceded it and that has contributed to its making. To know anything about oneself one must know all about others. There must be no mood with which one cannot sympathise, no dead mode of life that one cannot make alive."

 Week 1

Wednesday, January 17:

Read:

Jonardon Ganeri, "Introduction: Why Indian Philosophy? Why Now?", 1-12.

Malcolm Gladwell's "Group Think" in the New Yorker.

Ethan Watters, "We Aren't the World", Pacific Standard.

If you can make time, also read:
Joseph Henrich, Steven J. Heine, and Ara Norenzayan. 2010. "The Weirdest People in the World?" Behavioral and Brain Sciences (33)2-3: 61-83.

Methods, Literatures, Histories

Friday, January 18:

Matthew T. Kapstein, "Interpreting Indian Philosophy: Three Parables", 15-31; précis.

For Monday:
Sign-up for an Assessment (which is also the topic of your Argumentative Research Paper).
By 1:50 PM Monday, email me if you prefer a specific chapter and date. Otherwise, I'll assign one to you.

Week 2

Monday, January 22:

Ashok Aklujkar, "History and Doxography of the Philosophical Schools", 32-55; précis.

Sign up for Assessment.

Wednesday, January 24:

Justin E. H. Smith, "Philosophy as a Distinct Cultural Practice: The Transregional Context", 56-74; précis.

Friday, January 26:

Mark Siderits, "Comparison or Confluence in Philosophy?", 75-89; précis.

Week 3

Monday, January 29:

Précis on the Topic of your Assessment and Argumentative Research Paper.

Legacies of Sutta & Sūtra:
Philosophy Before Dignāga (100-480)

Wednesday, January 31:

Jan Westerhoff, "Nāgārjuna on Emptiness: A Comprehensive Critique of Foundationalism", 93-109; précis. 

Friday, February 2:

Tom J. F. Tillemans, "Philosophical Quietism in Nāgārjuna and Early Madhyamaka", 110-132; précis.

Exercise for Monday:

A 1-3 page Prospectus of your Argumentative Research Paper in which you:

1. indicate your topic and thesis.

2. describe the problem or issue to be treated.

3. outline your anticipated procedure and probable conclusion.

4. include an annotated bibliography of works to be consulted (a minimum of three books or articles, with a brief paragraph discussing the relevance of each work to your project).

Week 4

Monday, February 5:

Due at 1:50 PM:
Prospectus.

Title your docx file this way:

PHIL451_YourLastNameYourFirstName_Précis.docx

and

PHIL451_YourLastNameYourFirstName_Prospectus.docx

For example:

PHIL451_ArendtHannah_Prospectus.docx 

Wednesday, February 7:

Christopher G. Framarin, "Habit and Karmic Result in the Yogaśāstra", 133-151; précis.

Friday, February 9:

Jonathan C. Gold, "Vasubandhu on the Conditioning Factors and the Buddha's Use of Language", 152-170; précis.

Week 5

Monday, February 12:

Maria Heim, "Buddhaghosa on the Phenomenology of Love and Compassion", 171-186; précis.

Wednesday, February 14:

Piotr Balcerowicz, "The Philosophy of Mind of Kundakunda and Umāsvāti", 190-208; précis.

Friday, February 16:

Matthew R. Dasti, "Vatsyayana: Cognition as a Guide to Action", 209-230; précis.

Week 6

Monday, February 19:

Vincenzo Vergiani, "Bhartṛhari on Language, Perception and Consciousness", 231-252; précis.

The Age of Dialogue:
A Sanskrit Cosmopolis (480-800)

Wednesday, February 21:

John Taber and Kei Kataoka, "Coreference and Qualification: Dignāga Debated by Kumārila and Dharmakīrti", 255-271; précis.

Friday, February 23:

Monima Chadha, "Reflexive Awareness and No-Self: Dignāga Debated by Uddyotakara and Dharmakīrti", 272-288; précis.

Week 7

Monday, February 26:

Shalini Sinha, "The Metaphysics of Self in Praśastapāda's Differential Naturalism", 289-306; précis.

Wednesday, Feburary 28:

Birgit Kellner, "Proving Idealism: Dharmakīrti", 307-326; précis.

Friday, March 1:

Charles Goodman, "Śāntideva's Impartialist Ethics", 327-343; précis.

Week 8

Monday, March 4:

Ramkrishna Bhattacharya, "A History of Materialism from Ajita to Udbhaṭa", 344-359; précis.

Wednesday, March 6:

Christian Coseru, "Consciousness and Causal Emergence: Śāntarakṣita against Physicalism", 360-378; précis.

Friday, March 8:

Dan Arnold, "Pushing Idealism Beyond its Limits: The Place of Philosophy in Kamalaśīla's Steps of Cultivation", 379-399; précis.

The Age of Disquiet (800-1300)

Week 9

Monday, March 11:

Piotr Balcerowicz, "Jayarāśi Against the Philosophers", 403-419; précis.

Wednesday, March 13:

Rajam Raghunathan, "Two Theories of Motivation and their Assessment by Jayanta", 420-436; précis.

Friday, March 15:

Isabelle Ratié, "Utpaladeva and Abhinavagupta on the Freedom of Consciousness", 437-468; précis.

Week 10

Monday, March 18:

François Chenet, "The Nature of Idealism in the Mokṣopāyaśāstra/Yogavāsiṣṭha", 469-485; précis.

Wednesday, March 20:

Class canceled:
American Philosophical Association, Pacific Division Meetings.

Friday, March 22:

Class canceled:
American Philosophical Association, Pacific Division Meetings.

Week 11

Monday, March 25:

Spring Break.

Wednesday, March 27:

Spring Break.

Friday, March 29:

Spring Break.

Week 12

Monday, April 1:

Marie-Hélène Gorisse, "Logic in the Tradition of Prabhācandra", 486-506; précis.

Wednesday, April 3:

Donald R. Davis, Jr., "An Indian Philosophy of Law: Vijñāneśvara's Epitome of the Law", 507-521; précis.

Friday, April 5:

Jonardon Ganeri, "Śriharṣa's Dissident Epistemology: Of Knowledge as Assurance", 522-538; précis.

Philosophy From Gaṅgeśa (1300-1460)

Week 13

Monday, April 8:

Stephen H. Phillips, "A Defeasibility Theory of Knowledge in Gaṅgeśa", 541-558; précis.

Assessment: Simon Berman.

Wednesday, April 10:

Michael Williams, "Jayatīrtha and the Problem of Perceptual Illusion", 559-576; précis.

Assessment: Hazel Gill.

Friday, April 12:

The Festival of Scholars and Artists.

The Festival of Scholars and Artists is a campus-wide celebration of student work. It is an opportunity to discuss research, to exhibit, perform, appreciate art, and cross disciplinary boundaries. Although classes are cancelled, you are required to participate in the Festival, either by presenting your work or attending presentations.

Week 14

Monday, April 15:

Francis X. Clooney, SJ, "Mādhava's Garland of Jaimini's Reasons as Exemplary Mīmāṃsā Philosophy", 577-597; précis.

Assessment: Joe Tramontin.

Wednesday, April 17:

Andrew J. Nicholson, "Hindu Disproofs of God: Refuting Vedāntic Theism in the Sāṃkhya-Sūtra", 598-619; précis.

Assessment: Caleb Silverman.

Early Modernity:
New Philosophy in India (1460-1757)

Friday, April 19:

Michael Williams, "Raghunātha Śiroṃani and the Examination of the Truth about the Categories", 623-642; précis.

Assessment: Ward Anderson.

Week 15

Monday, April 22:

Christopher Minkowski, "Nīlakaṇṭha Caturdhara's Advaita Vedānta", 643-656; précis.

Wednesday, April 24:

Shankar Nair , "Muhibb Allāh Ilāhābādī on Ontology: Debates over the Nature of Being ", 657-690; précis.

Friday, April 26:

Reading Day.

Week 16

Monday, April 29:

Due at 1:00 PM:
Argumentative Research Paper.

Title your docx file this way:

PHIL451_YourLastNameYourFirstName_Paper.docx

Updated: 7 April 2024