The 23rd IPPA Congress
The 23rd IPPA Congress
S22
The Landscape Signature: A Framework for Comparative Tropical Urbanism in Southeast Asia
Scott Geoffrey Hawken1,2*, Christophe Pottier3, VÕ Thị Phương Thúy4, Shinatria Adhityatama5, Martin Polkinghorne6, Adam Wijker3, Vladyslav Sydorov3, and LÊ Thị Lan7
1School of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Adelaide, Australia; 2University of New South Wales, Australia; 3École française d'Extrême-Orient, France; 4Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, Vietnam; 5Research Centre for Environmental Archaeology, Maritime Archaeology and Sustainable Culture, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia; 6College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Flinders University, Australia; 7School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Vietnam; *scott.hawken@adelaide.edu.au
The study of Southeast Asian urbanism has long been constrained by theoretical models derived from temperate-zone cities, which fail to capture the region’s distinctive low-density, agrarian-based settlement patterns. This paper develops the ‘landscape signature’ – the material encoding of a society’s organizational principles, economic strategies, and ecological relationships – as a methodological framework for comparative analysis. Drawing on historical ecology, patch urbanism and niche construction theory, our approach uses systematic analysis of high-resolution remote sensing data and other geospatial sources to decode these signatures at a district and territorial scale. We develop this framework through examination of major premodern urban complexes (including Tuol Basan / Srei Santhor, Sukhothai, Borobudur-Prambanan, Hoa Lu), systematically mapping and classifying settlement features, hydraulic networks, agricultural landscapes, and spatial hierarchies that defined them. This comparative analysis reveals diverse, monsoon-adapted strategies of water management, resource production, and political integration that underpinned their long-term resilience. By examining how different societies developed unique signatures we demonstrate the usefulness of this approach in revealing nuanced historical trajectories. Through establishing a robust, replicable methodology for recognizing and interpreting landscape signatures, this research develops a paradigm for understanding tropical urbanism in the long term. It also serves to decolonizes urban theory by centring indigenous modes of settlement and their socio-ecological dynamics. By revealing the spatial signatures these societies create, our research offers vital, historically grounded lessons for sustainable development, water security, and climate adaptation in this rapidly urbanising region.