Medicine

Margaret Baker's book, like many early-modern recipe books, contained an array of medical recipes. There were two main types of medical recipes included in early-modern recipe books. Most medical recipes that were included within Baker's book (and indeed others like it) were true to the ideas of the medicinal scholars of the early-modern period. In fact, many of these remedies are still used to treat symptoms of illnesses today. However, there was also an element of mysticism to certain medical recipes within early-modern recipe books, and Baker's book is no exception to this. For example, Recipes that claimed to grant a cure for all sickness. This section will only cover the former, that is medical recipes that did not include a degree of mysticism and the supernatural, which are covered more in the Supernatural section of this site. The recipes examined were designed to relieve, heal and cure a number of common ailments using ingredients that would have been readily available within this time period. This section will examine examples of these recipes in Baker's recipe book, as well as explore where the people who produced these recipe books would learn these recipes and whether the practice of medicine within the home was a common occurrence in the early-modern period.

A recipe from Baker's book detailing a possible treatment for Rickets

What are some examples of medical recipes within Margaret Baker's recipe book, and how were they believed to work?

This first recipe details how to produce a remedy supposedly designed to prevent rickets (Baker, 51 v). Rickets is a disorder that manifests due to a lack of calcium, vitamin D or phosphate within a person's diet (http://www.healthline.com/health/rickets#symptoms). This particular recipe details how to create a herbal skin rub from salad oil (olive oil) and chamomile. It was thought at the time that medicine was absorbed through the skin, and so skin rubs were common in medical recipes. In early-modern medicine, it was believed that olive oil was useful in curing rickets. Culpeper's Pharmacopoeia states that "oyl of ripe olives" is effective in healing diseases associated with the spleen, such as "hyponchondriack melancholy, the rickets etc"(Culpeper 218). In addition, Culpeper states that "Oyl of Chamomel" strengthens the sinews, or the ligaments (Culpeper 216). These properties would be useful when treating rickets, as it is a disease that manifests through the weakening of bones and joints. This shows that in this case, Baker's recipe conformed with the scientific knowledge of the time.

Another recipe instructs the user how to make a recipe in order to get rid of worms in the stomach (Baker 59 v). A piece of wool is to be taken and dipped into the gall (bile) of a bull, to then be laid upon the navel (belly button) of the patient, which should in turn make the worms leave the body. The most similar recipe to this that can be found within Culpeper's pharmacopoeia does contain "Bulls gall boiled in a bath". However, the recipe also contains many other ingredients such as "juyce of wild cucumers" and "heifers butter", amongst a variety of others (Culpeper 231). Culpeper explains that "the belly anointed with it, it purgeth the stool"(Culpeper 232). The idea behind Baker's recipe seems to be that the Bull's gall rubbed on the belly of a patient would cause them to excrete the worms through their stool. In John Gerard's Herball, he advocates the mixing of "the juice of grafte and the gall of an Oxe or Bull together", at which point a cloth dipped in this mixture should be laid upon the navel. Gerard says this will "killieth wormes in children" (Gerard 3). The issue with Baker's recipe is that although once again the medicine generally coincides with medical practice of the time period, her recipe appears to be missing the additional ingredients contained within recipes from the likes of Gerard and Culpeper. This means the recipe may not have been as effective as Baker intended.

A recipe instructing the reader on how to treat worms of the stomach

A remedy for the removal of freckles taken from Baker's recipe book

This final recipe is a rather simple one, it is designed to remove freckles from the skin (Baker 83 v). The text instructs the reader to wash their face with sow's milk (milk from a pig) both in the morning and in the evening. Whilst there is no evidence of Sow's milk being used in medical recipes to cure freckles, there is other evidence to suggest that it was used by some in order to maintain healthy skin in the early-modern period. Susanna Montgomery, Countess of Eglinton in Scotland, lived until she was 81 and retained her good looks and skin complexion into her eighties. She attributed this to washing her face daily in sow's milk (Shaw Chapter 12). This demonstrates that, whilst it was not a medically understood cure at the time, there were some people who believed that it was an effective skin treatment.

Where did the people who wrote these recipe books find these recipes?

The vast majority of those writing recipe books in early-modern England would not have been taught medicine at school or educated with the intent of becoming a physician or medical practitioner. This meant that most of the medical recipes included in early-modern recipe books came from alternate sources.

One of the key sources for medical recipes that recipe book authors consulted often was medical books and journals that had been written by doctors and physicians. Many women who wrote recipe books would study the works of famous physicians in their spare time, learning recipes that they could use within their homes. For example, Sarah Wigges, a woman who published her own recipe book c. 1616, took many of the medical recipes in her book from famous medicinal and alchemical treatises. Two such examples of these are John Gerard's Herball and Andreas Libavius' Alchymia (Archer 205). This demonstrates that women would read and use medical recipes published by physicians, and that it was not necessary to have implicit medicinal knowledge in order to use and understand these kinds of recipes. As for Baker, there are several literary sources that can be traced within her work. One such source is Leonard Phioravant, as Baker copied a section from his book An Exact Collection of the Choicest and most Rare Experiments and Secrets in Physick and Chyrurgery (1659) (https://emroc.hypotheses.org/ongoing-projects/the-baker-project). In this section, the author describes witnessing the dissection of hundreds of animals (Baker 19r). As well as Phioravant, there are at least 3 other identifiable Literary sources of medical recipes in Bakers book, including an Italian physician named Matthew Lucatalla to whom she attributes several recipes (Baker fols. 1v, 2v, 76r, 115v). Baker was clearly well read, and this allowed her to collect recipes from a variety of different texts for use in her own book.

Of course, studying books and manuscripts was not the only way in which the individuals responsible for publishing these recipe books learned the medical recipes included within them. Word of mouth also played a huge role in the spread of medical recipes during the early-modern period. A lot of the medical recipes found within early-modern recipe books were probably given to the author of the book by a local physician or nurse, someone with previous medical knowledge who could provide a large variety of different medical recipes. However, medical professionals were not the only human source of medical recipes that one looking to write a recipe book could utilise. Recipe books represented a large section of society, and as such the recipes within them were often sourced from many different individuals. For example, Anne Brumwich's medicine for the stone was originally owned by 'old Doctor Ridgley', who then gave it to 'a particular friend of his, who then passed it to 'Mrs Highey'. Highey then sent the recipe to Lady Cavendish, who finally recommended the recipe to Anne Brumwich (Newton 16). This demonstrates that early-modern recipes often had complex tales of origin, and word of mouth was a key device by which women of the household learned medical recipes.

The recipes that appear to be sourced via word of mouth are more easily identifiable within Baker's book than her literary sources, mainly because many of them are credited on the pages in which their recipes are used. Beginning on folio 56 verso of Baker's book is a list of numbered medical recipes which stretches for over 20 pages and includes over 100 recipes, all except the last 2 listed being medicinal recipes. When examining the page on which this list starts, one notices a small signature in the corner, with the name "Mrs Weeks" inscribed (Baker 56 v). Inspection of the peerage yielded no results for a Mrs Weeks that was living at the same time and was located in the same area as Margaret Baker. Whoever this mysterious character is, the appearance of their name at the beginning of this list suggests that they were the credited source for these medical recipes, and that they clearly had a vast knowledge of medicine.

Weeks is not the only individual credited for medical recipes in the book. At the very beginning of the book, the first recipe is for a drink designed to treat scurvy. Once again, written in the top right hand corner is a name, this time being "Robartt Laine" (Baker 1 r). As Laine seems to be credited only for one or two recipes, it was likely he was just a friend of the Baker's. There are some sources in the book that are more easily traceable due to their connection to the aristocracy. Baker mentions her cousin Lettice Corbett as the source for several recipes. Corbett appears to be Baker's first cousin, and a woman who married the nobleman Sir John Corbett of Stoke (https://web.warwick.ac.uk/english/perdita/html/pw_BAKE01.htm). The aristocratic sources within Baker's book are the only word of mouth sources that are easily traceable. There are many other named sources within the book, several being named as cousins, such as Fanne Morris, Elizabeth Bury and Richard Redman, but simply not being traceable to the extent of Lettice Corbett due to not being nobility. However, whilst it is very difficult to trace the exact people that contributed recipes to Baker's book, what her accreditation's do show is that there are a large number of medical recipes within her book that come from family, friends and perhaps people within the local area.

Accreditation of Mrs Weeks as a source at the top of folio 56 verso of Baker's recipe book

Accreditation of Robartt Laine at the top of folio 1 recto of Margaret Baker's book

How often was medicine practised within the household environment?

Reading about these medical recipes in books was very different to actually following them and practising medicine within the household. Did the vast array of medical recipes present in early-modern recipe books actually represent the number of people that were practising medicine in the home environment?

The practise of medicine in the household appears to be quite a common occurrence in early-modern Europe, particularly amongst women as they were often the ones who stayed at home and looked after the household whilst the men went to work. According to Lindemann, a great deal of science and medicine was conducted in "neighbourhoods, coffee houses, courts, markets, villages and homes". Lindemann gives the example of Elizabethan gentlewoman Grace Mildmay, whose knowledge "extended to the compounding of Paracelsian chemical compounds". Paracelsianism was an alternative to the traditional school of learned medicine, and thus Mildmay's knowledge of these obscure medical practices demonstrates her vast medical knowledge. She explains that herbal remedies were common and households produced large quantities of elixirs and tonics for use in the home (Lindemann 105).

There are also contemporary accounts detailing women using medical recipes within the house and in their neighbourhood. In a letter written to the famous physician Hans Sloane, a man named J. Hare describes a woman from a neighbouring house coming over to the house Hare was lodging in to treat a sick patient. The patient was complaining of ear pain due to maggots within his ears, and Hare tells us "a neighbouring woman was sent for who applied to it ye steam of warm Milk". The maggots are later dislodged from the patient's ear and are able to be removed (http://sloaneletters.com/letters/letter-2580/). Not only was a woman from the local neighbourhood called to aid the patient, she prescribed the correct treatment to help the patient. This displays that not only did women practise household medicine, but they had quite extensive knowledge of symptoms and what treatment to use.

By Felix Wills


Archer, Jayne, "Women and Chymistry in Early Modern England: The Manuscript Receipt Book (c. 1616) of Sarah Wigges", In Gender and Scientific Discourse in Early Modern Culture, Ed. Long, Kathleen Turner, Henry (Surrey, 2010)

Baker, Margaret. Receipt Book of Margaret Baker, ca. 1675, (MS V.a.619. Folger Shakespeare Library, Washington, D.C.)

Culpeper, Nicholas, Pharmacopoeia Londinensis, or, the London dispensatory, (London, 1720)

Gerard, John, The herball, or, Generall historie of plantes, (London, 1636)

Lindemann, Mary, "Disease and Medicine", in "The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern European History 1350-1750, volume 1", Ed. Hamish Scott, Oxford University Press, (Oxford, 2015)

Newton, Hannah, "The Sick Child in Early Modern England 1580-1720" (Oxford, 2012)

Shaw, Karl, "Mad, Bad and Dangerous to Know: The Extraordinary Exploits of the British and European Aristocracy" (London, 2017)

http://sloaneletters.com/letters/letter-2580/ Accessed: 04/05/2017

http://www.healthline.com/health/rickets#symptoms Accessed: 03/05/2017

https://web.warwick.ac.uk/english/perdita/html/pw_BAKE01.htm Accessed: 07/05/2017

https://emroc.hypotheses.org/ongoing-projects/the-baker-project Accessed: 09/05/2017