Welcome

The Most Recent Publication

"The Tempos of Decolonization: Violence, Temporality, and Colonial Korea."  (Political Theory) - Forthcoming

To what extent does revolutionary violence delay or accelerate the process of decolonization? In early 20th century colonial Korea, anticolonial thinkers were divided over the temporal role of violence in decolonization. On the one hand, pessimists preferred waiting for the right moment to achieve decolonization without resorting to violence. On the other hand, optimists sought to bring about that moment through the uncompromising use of violence against the colonizer. This debate is evident in the writings of Lee Gwang-su (1892–1950) and Cho So-ang (1887–1958). For Lee, the colonized would eventually achieve decolonization if they patiently awaited the right moment for negotiations. He argued that reactionary violence would be counterproductive, as it would merely provoke the colonizer and eliminate the possibility of constructive dialogue. In contrast, Cho believed that the colonized must actively initiate decolonization through the use of violence against the colonizer. For him, a violent revolution would foster confidence and pride among the colonized, ignite solidarity with other colonized peoples, and ultimately compel the colonizers to reconsider their grip on power.