Accepted Papers

History of RUD > RUD 2011 > Accepted Papers

Accepted Papers

The following is the list of the papers that have been accepted for presentation (presenting author is in bold).

    • N. AL-NAJJAR and L. DE CASTRO - "Parametric Representation of Preferences"

    • M. AMARANTE, Y. HALEVY and E. OZDENOREN - "Two-Stage Probabilistic Sophistication"

    • A. BAILLON and H. BLEICHRODT - "Testing Ambiguity Models Through the Measurement of Probabilities for Gains and Losses"

    • P. BATTIGALLI, A. DI TILLIO and D. SAMET - "Strategies and Interactive Beliefs in Dynamic Games"

    • A. BODOH-CREED - "Ambiguous Beliefs and Mechanism Design"

    • M. CHANDRASEKHER - "Incomplete Menu Preferences and Ambiguity"

    • M. DEAN and P. ORTOLEVA - "Is it All Connected? Understanding the Relationship Between Behavioral Phenomena"

    • K. ELIAZ and P. ORTOLEVA - "A Variation on Ellsberg"

    • A. ELLIS - "Condorcet Meets Ellsberg"

    • L. EPSTEIN and K. SEO - "Ambiguity with Repeated Experiments"

    • A. ARAUJO, A. CHATEAUNEUF and J. FARO - "Pricing Rules and Arrow-Debreu Ambiguous Valuation"

    • T. HAYASHI - "Consistent Updating of Social Welfare Functions"

    • S. HORAN - "Sequential Search and Choice from Lists"

    • P. KLIBANOFF, S. MUKERJI and K. SEO - "Relevance and Symmetry"

    • J. LLERAS - "Expected Knowledge"

    • M. MACHINA - "Ambiguity Aversion with Three Outcomes or Many States"

    • Y. MASATLIOGLU, D. NAKAJIMA and E. OZDENOREN - "Revealed Willpower"

    • P. NATENZON - "Random Choice and Learning"

    • A. GUMEN and A. SAVOCHKIN - "Dynamically Stable Preferences"

    • M. SINISCALCHI - "Behavioral Counterfactuals"

    • G. RIELLA and R. TEPER - "Probabilistic Dominance and Status Quo Bias"

    • E. KARNI and M. VIERØ - "Reverse Bayesianism: A Choice-Based Theory of Growing Awareness"

    • F. MENGEL, E. TSAKAS and A. VOSTROKNUTOV - "Decision Making with Imperfect Knowledge of the State Space"

    • S. TRAUTMANN and P. WAKKER - "A Reference-Dependent Generalization of Schmeidler’s Choquet Expected Utility:

    • Making the Anscombe-Aumann Ambiguity Model Suited for Descriptive Applications"