nyu15

The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface

Philippe Schlenker

(LINGUAE, Institut Jean-Nicod, CNRS; New York University)

September-October 2015 - NYU

Instructor: Philippe Schlenker

Directeur de Recherche, Institut Jean-Nicod, Paris

Global Distinguished Professor, New York University

E-mail: philippe.schlenker@gmail.com

Topic

This seminar will survey recent developments at the semantics/pragmatics interface. In the last 10 years, vibrant debates about presuppositions, scalar implicatures and supplements have led to a renewed understanding of the division of labor between semantics (literal meaning) and pragmatics (inferences drawn by reasoning on the speaker's motivations). Thus presuppositions, which were taken in the 1970's to be a pragmatic phenomenon, were argued in the 1980's to rightly belong to compositional semantics; but recent research has offered various alternatives to this conclusion, based in part on pragmatic mechanisms. The opposite movement took place in implicature theory: the neo-Gricean approach of the 1970's and 1980's took scalar implicatures to be primarily a pragmatic phenomenon, but recent debates on 'embedded implicatures' have located their source in the semantics or even in the syntax. Similar debates exist about supplements (= the contribution of appositive relative clauses). We will survey some of these topics, with special attention to new empirical issues that might bear on them (e.g. the analysis of co-speech gestures, analyzed as non-standard presuppositions ['cosuppositions'] or as supplements).

Background reading for the course:

Schlenker, Philippe: to appear, The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface. To appear in the Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics, eds. Aloni and Dekker.

Preprint available on LingBuzz.

Requirements

Besides active class participation:

(i) regular problem sets;

(ii) 1 class presentation;

(iii) 1 mini-term paper (to be emailed 10 days after the end of the seminar).

Schedule

8 weeks in September-October 2014 - see below for sessions and readings. Note that due to peculiarities of this term's calendar the main sessions will be on Wednesdays, at least towards the beginning of the term.

–General sessions (2 hours 45 per week) are open to everyone

–Student sessions (1 hour 45 per week) are open to all students and postdocs (whether registered or not for the course).

Reserved times

Mon 3.30 PM - 6.15 PM at 10WP 103

Wed 11.00 AM - 1.45 PM at 10WP 103

[the total is one hour more than the official duration of the seminar; we will use only 2 hours for the 'student session', to be held on Mondays towards the beginning of the term]

Sessions and Readings (still tentative; to be adapted as we go)

Note: the slides and the readings which are not found below are made available via this Dropbox folder [send e-mail to the instructor if you want the folder to be shared with you, rather than accessing it with a link]

Announcements: 1. If you wish to be informed of possible changes by email, please register here. 2. There will be a makeup student session on Friday, September 25 at 2pm (see below).

The main readings are in bold.

Tuesday, October 13 [= NYU classes meet on a Monday schedule] 3:30pm-6:15pm 10WP 103 -

1. Presentation by Robert Beddor

2. Presentation by Daniel Hoek

3. Presentation by Harvey Lederman

Monday, October 5 - 3:30pm-6:15pm 10WP 103 - Guest lecture by Sam Alxatib (CUNY) on scalar implicatures (among others)

Actuality Entailments and related matters in semantics/pragmatics

Abstract: In many languages that morphologically distinguish the perfective from the imperfective, perfective-marked root modals give rise to an actuality inference, namely that the relevant ability/obligation was *actually* realized. We will discuss the relevance of this pattern for the semantics/pragmatics interface, focusing on Scalar Implicatures, and (time-permitting) presuppositions and Free Choice inferences.

Link to Swanson's paper on structurally defined alternatives

Monday, September 28 - General session 3:30pm-6:15pm 10WP 103

(note the time!!)

Conclusion on local contexts.

Presuppositions vs. cosuppositions: co-speech gestures

Optional readings:

Schlenker to appear Gestural Presuppositions [Squib - Snippets]

Schlenker 2015 Gesture Projection and Cosuppositions [much longer]

Time permitting: further topics (DRT, Trivalence; see below for readings)

Problem Set 5 is in the shared Dropbox folder (in .doc and .pdf).

Due: Monday, September 28, 10pm by email to: philippe.schlenker@gmail, preferably in pdf format, with wide margins to allow for comments

Reminder: if you wish to be informed of possible changes by email, please register here.

Monday, September 21 - Student session 4:30pm-6:15pm 10WP 103

Dynamic semantics for presupposition vs. dynamic semantics for donkey anaphora: a simple fragment [slides in the Dropbox folder]

Monday, September 14 - Student session 4:30pm-6:15pm 10WP 103

Questions and discussion.

[No Monday in Week 2 - Labor Day]

Monday Sessions

Mon [room reserved 3.30 PM - 6.15 PM at 10WP 103, but student sessions are only 1 hour 45 minutes long, so please check below]

[No Monday in Week 1 - classes haven't started]

Wednesday Sessions

Wed 11.00 AM - 1.45 PM at 10WP 103

Wednesday, September 2 - General session: Presupposition

• Intro: The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface. Section 3

• The projection problem for presuppositions. Could presuppositions be treated as scalar implicatures?

Problem Set 1 is in the shared Dropbox folder (in .doc and .pdf).

Due: Monday, September 7, 10pm by email to: philippe.schlenker@gmail, preferably in pdf format

Wednesday, September 9 - General session: Presupposition

• Background on scalar implicatures (useful for the discussion of presuppositions-as-scalar-implicatures): The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface Section 2.1

• Stalnaker's theory Optional reading: Pragmatic Presuppositions [pdf]

• Heim's Theory:

–Summary: Two Theories of Local Contexts - Part I

–The source (optional but recommended): Heim 1983

• Time permitting: introduction to Transparency theories. The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface. Section 3.4.1.

Problem Set 2 is in the shared Dropbox folder (in .doc and .pdf).

Due: Monday, September 14, 10pm by email to: philippe.schlenker@gmail, preferably in pdf format

Wednesday, September 16 - General session: Presupposition

• A pragmatic alternative to dynamic semantics: the Transparency Theory

The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface. Section 3.4

• Optional: Schlenker, Be Articulate (published version in the Dropbox folder)

• For next week: Two Theories of Local Contexts - Part II

Problem Set 3 is in the shared Dropbox folder (in .doc and .pdf).

Due: Monday, September 21, 10pm by email to: philippe.schlenker@gmail, preferably in pdf format, with wide margins to allow for comments

Wednesday, September 23 - General session

• Incremental vs. symmetric presupposition projection

Optional: Chemla and Schlenker 2012 (Dropbox folder)

Optional: F. Schwarz 2013, Symmetry and Incrementality in Conditionals (Droppbox folder)

• A pragmatic reconstruction of local contexts: Two Theories of Local Contexts - Part II

Very optional [long, and summarized in 'Two Theories of Local Contexts - Part II']: Schlenker 2009 Local Contexts

Problem Set 4 is in the shared Dropbox folder (in .doc and .pdf).

Due: Monday, September 28, 8pm (note the non-standard time) by email to: philippe.schlenker@gmail, preferably in pdf format, with wide margins to allow for comments

Friday, September 25 - Makeup student session 2pm 10 WP 104

• Presentation by Masha Esipova.

[Wednesday, September 30 - NO CLASS; make-up session on Friday, September 25]

Wednesday, October 7 - 11am-1pm 10 Washington Place Room 103 Guest lecture by Karen Emmorey (San Diego State): How signers gesture

Note: ASL interpreting will be provided for this talk.

Abstract: In this talk, I explore the relation between gesture and sign language from linguistic, psycholinguistic, and cognitive neuroscience perspectives. “Co-sign” gesture differs from co-speech gesture with respect to the primary articulators (the face/body vs. the hands), the optionality of gesture, and types of gestures that are possible. I will also present the results of studies with bilinguals who are fluent in a signed and a spoken language, which indicate knowledge of American Sign Language (ASL) can impact the form and content of co-speech gesture. Finally, I will present neuroimaging results that reveal differences between the neural systems that support gesture and sign language. Overall, the study of how signers produce and comprehend gesture can yield new and unique insights into the psychological mechanisms and neural systems that underlie language and gesture.

[Lunch option: a group reservation was made for 1:15pm at Otto's]

Readings: in the seminar's Dropbox folder

Wednesday, October 14 General session: Complements on Presuppositions + Implicatures I

Summary of DRT: Section 3.3 of The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface. (see below for more detailed accounts)

Summary of Trivalence: Section 5 of Presupposition Projection: the New Debate, SALT

Implicatures: Section 2 of The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface.

Wednesday, October 21

• Presentation by Adina Williams

• Presentation by Cindy Chen

• Presentation by WooJin Chung

Mini-term paper due on November 1, 2015

Monday, October 19 General session: Implicatures II

Additional Links [many links got broken after NYU retired Files 2.0; I am working on restoring them, but don't hesitate to send me email if you can't access a paper from the following list]

Basic Readings on Presuppositions

• Origins of the Dynamic Approach

Heim, I.: 1983, On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions. In D. Flickinger et al. (eds), Proceedings of the Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 114-125. Reprinted in Davis, S. (ed): 1991, Pragmatics: A Reader, Oxford University Press [pdf]

Stalnaker, R.: 1974, Pragmatic Presuppositions. In Munitz, M. and Unger, P. (eds.) Semantics and Philosophy. New York: New York University Press. Reprinted in Davis, S. (ed): 1991, Pragmatics: A Reader, Oxford University Press. [pdf]

Karttunen, L.: 1974, Presupposition and Linguistic Context. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181-194. Reprinted in Davis (ed): 1991, Pragmatics: A Reader, Oxford University Press. [pdf]

• Presuppositions

Geurts, B.: 1999, Presupposition and Pronouns. Elsevier. Some chapters are available here:

Chapter one: Presupposition

Chapter two: The binding theory

Chapter four: Dynamic semantics

Chapter six: Modals

Kadmon, N.: 2001, Formal Pragmatics. Blackwell.

Heim, I.: 1990, Presupposition Projection. In R. van der Sandt (ed.) "Presupposition, Lexical Meaning and Discourse Processes: Workshop Reader," University of Nijmegen, 1990. Available here through Semantics Archive.

Additional Readings on Presuppositions

Overview of some recent approaches, including trivalence

Schlenker, Philippe: 2009, Presupposition Projection: the New Debate, SALT

Be Articulate and Local Contexts

Schlenker, P.: 2008, "Be Articulate: A Pragmatic Theory of Presupposition Projection". Theoretical Linguistics 34:3, 157-212 [pdf]

Schlenker, P.: 2009, "Local Contexts". Semantics and Pragmatics 2, 3: 1–78, 2009 [pdf]

Schlenker, P.: 2010, "Presuppositions and Local Contexts". Mind 2010 [pdf] (short and relatively non-technical)

Schlenker, Philippe: 2011, “Presupposition Projection: Two Theories of Local Contexts – Part I”. Language and Linguistics Compass 5, 12: 848–857, DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00299.x

Schlenker, Philippe: 2011, “Presupposition Projection: Two Theories of Local Contexts – Part II”. Language and Linguistics Compass 5, 12: 858–879 DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00300.x

On 'local redundancy' and the reconstruction of local contexts:

Trivalence

Fox, Danny (2008) Two short notes on Schlenker’s theory of presupposition projection. Theoretical Linguistics 34, 3: 237-252 [pdf]

George, B. R. (2008) 'Presupposition Repairs: a Static, Trivalent Approach to Predicting Projection’, M.A. thesis, UCLA. [pdf]

George, B. R. (2008) ‘Predicting Presupposition Projection: some alternatives in the strong Kleene tradition’, manuscript, UCLA. [pdf]

Peters, S.: 1979, A Truth-Conditional Formulation of Karttunen's Account of Presupposition. Synthese 40, 2: 301-316 [pdf]

Continuations and presuppositions

Probability and the Proviso Problem

Lassiter, Dan: 2012, Presuppositions, provisos, and probability. S&P

The DRT Alternative to Dynamic Semantics

Stanford Encyclopedia Article on Presupposition (Beaver and Geurts)

Stanford Encylopedia Article on DRT (Beaver and Geurts)

Geurts's Paris Lectures on the Presuppositions

I. Presuppositions

II. DRT

III. Focus

Geurts, B.: 1999, Presupposition and Pronouns. Elsevier. Some chapters are available here:

Chapter one: Presupposition

Chapter two: The binding theory

Chapter four: Dynamic semantics

Chapter six: Modals

van der Sandt, R.: 1992, Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution. Journal of Semantics: 9: 333-377 [pdf]

Further recent theories

• Presuppositions vs. Implicatures

(i) Chemla's Similarity theory

Chemla, Emmanuel: Similarity: towards a unified account of scalar implicatures, free choice permission and presupposition projection

(ii) Romoli's theory

Published version

(iii) Abusch's theory

Abusch, Dorit: Presupposition Triggering from Alternatives.

(iv) Psycholinguistic work

Acquisition

See below: Chemla 2009, Chemla and Bott

• Sudo's bidimensional anaphoric theory

Sudo, Yasutada: 2014, Presupposition Projection in Quantified Sentences and Cross-Dimensional Anaphora

• DRT with Local Contexts

Schlenker, Philippe: 2011, DRT with Local Contexts. NALS. [LingBuzz] [Published]

• 'Projective Meanings'

"Toward a taxonomy of projective content", Judith Tonhauser, David Beaver, Craige Roberts and Mandy Simons, Language 89(1): 66-109. [doi], Preprint (PDF).

Experimental Approaches

A recent survey:

Chemla, Emmanuel (2009). "Presuppositions of quantified sentences: experimental data". Natural Language Semantics 17(4), pp 299-340, doi:10.1007/s11050-009-9043-9 [pdf]

Chemla, Emmanuel and Lewis Bott (in press). "Processing presuppositions: dynamic semantics vs pragmatic enrichment". Language and Cognitive Processes. [pdf]

Chemla, Emmanuel and Schlenker, Philippe (2012). "Incremental vs. Symmetric Accounts of Presupposition Projection: An Experimental Approach". Natural Language Semantics 20(2), pp 177-226, doi:10.1007/s11050-012-9080-7. [pdf]

Kennedy, Schwarz, Crain, Folli, and Romoli: Scalar Implicatures vs. Presuppositions: the view from Broca’s Aphasia [NELS abstract] [paper]

Florian Schwarz and Sonja Tiemann Presupposition Projection in Online Processing

Further topics

• Maximize Presupposition

Singh, Raj (2010) "Maximize Presupposition! and Local Contexts" [pdf] Accepted with minor revisions in Natural Language Semantics.

Percus, Orin (2006) "Antipresuppositions". [pdf] In A. Ueyama(ed.), Theoretical and Empirical Studies of Reference and Anaphora: Toward the establishment of generative grammar as an empirical science, Report of the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), Project No. 15320052, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, 52-73

• Triggering Problem

Abrusan, Marta (2010) "Triggering Verbal Presuppositions" [pdf] Manuscript, Oxford.

• Formal Properties of the Transparency Theory

Schlenker, P.: 2007, Anti-Dynamics: Presupposition Projection Without Dynamic Semantics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16, 3: 325-256 (32 pages)

• Other papers in the trivalent tradition

Beaver, D. and Krahmer, E.: 2001, A Partial Account of Presupposition Projection. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10, 2. Available here.

• Accommodation

Beaver, D. and Zeevat, H.: to appear, Accommodation. In Ramchand, G. and C. Reiss (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Oxford University Press.

A new handbook paper by R. Singh on presupposition projection and presupposition accommodation.

• More on the Proviso Problem

Schlenker, P.: 2011, The Proviso Problem: a Note, NALS

• General Survey

Beaver, D.: 1997: Presupposition. In J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Handbook of Logic and Language, Elsevier, pp. 939-1008.

Related course materials

Benjamin Spector, Scalar Implicatures and Grammar, ESSLLI 2010 (highly recommended; this course heavily borrows from Spector's notes).

• An Anti-Localist Survey

Geurts, Bart: 2011, Quantity Implicatures. [pdf]

• A Localist Manifesto

Chierchia, Fox, and Spector: to appear, The Grammatical View of Scalar Implicatures and the Relationship between Semantics and Pragmatics. To appear in Handbook of Semantics, Paul Portner, Claudia Maienborn et Klaus von Heusinger (Eds), Mouton de Gruyter. [pdf]

• Globalist accounts of truth-conditional inferences

Sauerland, Uli: 2004, Scalar Implicatures in Complex Sentences. Linguistics & Philosophy 2004. [pdf]

van Rooij, Robert and Schultz, Katrin: 2006, Pragmatic Meaning and Non-monotonic Reasoning: The Case of Exhaustive Interpretation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 2006, 29: 205-250 [pdf]

van Rooij, Robert and Schultz, Katrin: 2004, Exhaustive interpretation of complex sentences. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 2004, 13: 491-519 [pdf]

Spector Benjamin, Scalar Implicatures: Exhaustivity and Gricean Reasoning, In M. Aloni, A. Butler & P. Dekker (eds.), Questions in Dynamic Semantics, Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface, Elsevier, 2007.

• Experimental Evidence

–Implicatures in general

Frazier, Lyn: 2011, Computing Scalar Implicatures. Proceedings of SALT. [pdf]

Daniel J. Grodner, Natalie M. Klein, Kathleen M. Carbary, Michael K. Tanenhaus, “Some,” and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment. Cognition, Volume 116, Issue 1, July 2010, Pages 42-55

Bott, L. & Noveck, I.A. (2004). Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 437-457. [pdf]

Gualmini, Andrea, Stephen Crain, Luisa Meroni, Gennaro Chierchia and Maria Teresa Guasti (2001) “At the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface in Child Language,” Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 11, 231-247, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. [pdf]

Noveck, I. A. (2001).When children are more logical than adults: Investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition, 78, 165-188 [pdf]

Noveck I and Posada A (2003). Investigating the time course of implicature. Brain and Language 85(2):203-10 [pdf]

• Computing Alternatives

Fox, D. & R. Katzir, On the characterization of alternatives, Natural Language Semantics 2011.

• Free Choice Inferences

Fox, Danny, 2007. Free Choice Disjunction and the Theory of Scalar Implicatures draft of a paper published in U. Sauerland & P. Stateva (eds.) Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics, Palgrave Macmillan.

• Plurals and Higher-Order Implicatures

Spector Benjamin. Aspects of the Pragmatics of Plural Morphology: On Higher-Order Implicatures Published with minor changes in U. Sauerland & P. Stateva (eds.), Presuppositions and Implicatures in Compositional Semantics, Palgrave-Macmillan, 2007.

Implicatures