pepe remey to neal chase october 5, 1991

AN OPEN LETTER TO NEAL CHASE

The opening lines of your letter: "You quote Esslemont in Baha'u'llah and the New Era, to prove your basic fact that Baha'u'llah's Revelation supersedes all previous ones and therefore Old and New Testament prophecies are no longer applicable. You state that "One may not call himself a Baha'i and go back to past scriptures". And also that Abdu'l Baha declared clearly that he was not a prophet, therefore could not prophesy."

Let us now see how Neal Chase OPERATES to put over his "tricks" which he learned from the MASTER PRESTIDIGITATOR, Mr. Jensen:

He claims I quote Esslemont "TO PROVE". That is false, I would never quote Esslemont to prove anything. I quoted Esslemont as REFERENCE. That is quite something else, but for individuals who create their own PROOFS, it is only natural for them to suspect others of their own guilt. While on Esslemont's book, Ch. IV, sub-title STATION OF ABDU'L BAHA . Esslemont quotes: "Abdu'l Baha himself makes no claim to independent prophethood." This is a "reference" Mr. Chase, NOT a PROOF. The Proof can be found in Abdu'l Baha's own words from His Tablets vol. ii p.429: "No name, no title, no mention, no commendation hath he, nor will ever have, except Abdu'l Baha--Servant of Baha".

It is TRUE Baha'u'llah's Revelation supercedes all Past Prophesies. You went on to quote ONLY A PORTION of my statement that Old and New Testament prophesies are no longer applicable. I went on to state "no longer applicable to be claimed by Mr. Jensen to put forth his "contrived" proofs that he fulfills the very prophesies that Baha'u'llah claimed for Himself. Why did you quote only a portion of my statement? If you had, you could not have come up with one of your "tricks". You prove yourself "crafty" and "dishonest" "untrustworthy" and a determined Liar.

Old & New Testament scriptures should be read for REFERENCE and to PROVE the spiritual Station of Baha'u'llah. Abdu'l Baha, Himself stated: "This is He (Baha'u'llah) whom God promised in ALL His Books and Scriptures such as the Bible, The Gospels and the Qur'an". That is my PROOF for stating anyone who turns to Old & New Testament Scriptures to Prove Mr. Jensen fulfills Prophesy cannot call himself a BAHA'I, but a JENSENITE.

I, myself, as has done Charles Gaines and others of Mr. Jensen's former supporters, find ample PROOF from REVELATION that JENSEN CANNOT BE the Lamb, nor the Seventh Angel or the Knight on the White Horse (plus the many other titles he has claimed). I would have no objection to Jensen's claiming fulfillment of Chapter 12 of Revelation (12) "Woe to the inhabitors of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time."

Then go on to Chapter 20, (2)"And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years".

Conclusion: If Baha'u'llah's New Revelation is to become a REALITY and to last a thousand years before the appearance of a New Manifestation, the Devil must first be bound for a thousand years to allow the New Revelation "freedom" from "evil" of the Devil to become a REALITY. Of course the Devil doesn't want that to come about so he claims it is he who must Establish the Kingdom - his kingdom - to disorientate the people from the "straight path". And, "if by their "FRUITS" ye shall Know Them", it is enough to read the material distributed by Jensen & Chase to see they are Disciples of the Devil Himself.

- 1 -

You see, Neal, the difference between us is that I quote exactly what is written, while you and Jensen quote only PARTS of statements. When you find NOTHING to criticize, you make up statements of your own and attribute that statement to someone you want to criticize, then you go ahead and criticize the VERY STATEMENT YOU MADE UP, to show how clever you can be. That is not being CLEVER .that is being CRAFTY.

You want an EXAMPLE to PROVE my accusation? Simple, just go on where I left off in the first Par. of your letter. See? We don't have to go far off: You accuse me of stating:

"Therefore according to your definition Abdu'l Baha is not even a Baha'i because he goes back to past scriptures! What is wrong with you? Not only does Abdu'l Baha go back to past scriptures but Baha'u'llah himself has commanded us all to study the previous revelations so we can better be acquainted with His. What is wrong with you?"

Now, let us consider your false accusation above:

You state "according to your definition" that was NOT MY definition at all. It is a definition YOU MADE UP and attribute to ME falsely. Why don't you give MY EXACT words, instead of supplying your own? Abdu'l Baha' goes back to past scriptures to explain His Father's Station. I would be a FOOL to object to criticize Him, in that and YOU KNOW I NEVER intended that at all. I CRITICIZE YOU AND THOSE LIKE YOU who uphold Mr. Jensen for turning back to Old & New Testament Scriptures to claim he fulfills prophesies that were claimed by Abdu'l Baha' would accept Jensen's foolish claims, can you? You have so falsely accused me of saying something totally foreign to anything in my mind, as to appear an ENEMY of Abdu'l Baha and Baha'ullah whereas, in reality, I AM AN ENEMY of Mr. Leland Jensen and his cohorts with you, yourself, NEAL at the top of the list!

The ONLY truth in that quotation of yours WHICH I DID STATE was that: "Baha'u'llah, Himself, has commanded us all to study the previous revelations so we can better be acquainted with His". But you "craftily" quote it as if YOU said it and not I. As if to PROVE I am WRONG and YOU are RIGHT. It is the very point I base my criticisms against you and Jensen on, i.e., to prove from past scriptures that it is the New Revelation of Baha'u'llah that has been prophesied, and NOT what Mr. Jensen claims. In your letter you keep repeating (after every "trick" you play on me) "What is wrong with you?" ..

May I please have the pleasure of asking you just once: Neal, What is Wrong with You?

In conclusion, let me repeat for the .upth time

Mr. Leland Jensen has every right to claim WHATEVER he wishes .from WHATEVER SOURCE he deems necessary to put forth his claim to fulfill prophesy. That is his affair and those who support him in his claim are perfectly within their rights.

What I object to is the fact that in order to put forth his claims, he tells lies upon lies, makes up false stories based on his "insight" or his "ability to know what goes on in peoples minds". He and his co-writers make false accusations against Mason Remey, myself and now against the very people who have been his staunchest supporters because they have DARED to question him on very urgent issues. His newly declared DOCTRINE is so far from anything "Baha'i" to discourage even one of the most EXPERT and KNOWLEDGIBLE Connoisseurs of the Baha'i Faith living today, Mr. Charles Gaines! Open your eyes, Neal, and "see the light".

[along the margin:] PS: Pepe has criticized only the first Par. of Mr. Chase's 12 Page letter! He assures you who read this statement, the entire letter shows the same methods used.

- 2 -

A Special Post Script for Neal:

Dear Neal:

On page 11 of your letter (dated Sept 26, 1991) you compare me to a Catholic Priest trying to explain the TRINITY. That does not trouble me since you put Charles Gaines in the same category claiming he, too, is interested in HIS TRINITY whatever you mean by that?

Well now If I am, in any way to be compared to a Catholic Priest, it can only be due to my efforts to EXORCISE you from the DEVILS that have evidently taken possession of you.

Your writings are full of Vicious Venom, Vulgar Language, Vain-glorious spiritual self-agrandisement and Vagarities of a Vacuous minded Villian.

(try to beat that one, Neal!)

That UGLY statement you VOMITED from your Putrified Belly against Mason Remey - on page 4 of your previous letter - calling him "The most horrible, degenerate and horrendous violator" and that "when he violated, the stink was so foul and perverse that all the people had to FLEE from Mason to save their own lives!"

Such a statement could only come from a demented mind or, from a person POSSESSED of deamons of the deep dungeons of INFERNO.

(see how generous I am with you Neal? I send you to "inferno" instead of "Hell" where you send those who oppose you).

Perhaps God has inspired me (as the Catholic Priest YOU see in Me) to EXORCISE you from the evil spirits that possess you. You must be very DEAR to God for Him to be so Concerned over your spiritual WELFARE and I consider it a special PRIVILEGE to be the CHOSEN ONE to free you because, in spite of my continuous antagonistic attacks on you, Neal, there is something very LOVABLE about you.

The statement you made against Mason .and many others in the past remind me of a scene from the Movie "The EXORCIST" where the little girl possessed of devils VOMITS up YOUR VENOM to rid yourself of the Devils that are gnawing in the pit of your stomach.

The STINK you accused Mason of can only be your OWN FOUL-MOUTHED BAD BREATH blowing back to your nostrils. That is why I suggested you were probably having your "bowel-movements" from the wrong end.

My prayer for you is that "you may be rid of your devils". The devils you allowed to enter when you became a Disciple of the Devil believing him to be The Lamb. Your language cannot be that of a disciple of the Lamb of God.

It is not Mason Remey who is "screaming in pain and suffering for God to let him out of Hell", as you stated in that ugly diatribe against him. It must be your own troubled spiritual conscience ringing out in your brain to free yourself from the bottomless pit of hell ..grasp on to my extended hand, Neal ..there is still HOPE.

Written with "a pure, kindly and radiant heart"

by:

Joseph-Pepe-Remey

- 3 -

[Handwritten on the back of page 3:]

Dear Brent: My purpose is to BOMBARD Neal & Leland with a dose of their own Ammunition

Pepe

P.S. Distribute as you see fit.

[Handwritten on the back of page 3 of Neal's letter:]

Dear Neal "My dear Boy"

My purpose is to BOMBARD you & your EDUCATOR with a dose of your own Medicine. Pepe

Source: Dave Cornell