If you want lighter earbuds with a stated longer single-charge playtime, choose ZJchao Earbuds; if you need newer Bluetooth connectivity and noise-cancelling microphones, choose LICAEVEY BT 5.4. For basketball, I’d lean toward LICAEVEY’s secure clamp-on design, while ZJchao is the simpler fit for someone who values lower earbud weight and an on-case battery display.
ZJchao Earbuds vs LICAEVEY BT 5.4 at a Glance
• ZJchao Earbuds’ biggest strength: Each earbud weighs 4.1 g, and the stated playtime is up to 3.5 hours per charge. Trade-off: Bluetooth 5.1 and an approximately 10-meter range are the older and shorter-range specifications here.
• Battery visibility: Both have a digital battery display in the charging case, so either can help you check remaining power before heading out.
• Fit and movement: LICAEVEY describes a clamp-on design intended to stay secure during workouts; ZJchao emphasizes a lightweight, stable in-ear fit.
• Choose ZJchao if you prioritize lighter earbuds and the longer stated single-charge listening time.
• Choose LICAEVEY if you want newer Bluetooth, noise-cancelling microphones, and a specifically described secure fit for active use.
ZJchao makes its case with low earbud weight and a modest set of practical features. Each earbud weighs 4.1 g, a little less than LICAEVEY’s 4.8 g. The design is in-ear, and the product is described as comfortable and stable to wear. For a player moving around on a court, lower weight may be appealing if heavy-feeling earbuds tend to distract you. Still, the sheet does not describe a clamp-on or sport-locking design, so I would not assume that lightness alone guarantees a secure fit during quick cuts, jumps, or contact.
The listed Bluetooth version is 5.1, with automatic pairing when the case lid is opened. The stated transmission range is approximately 10 meters in an open, obstacle-free environment. That should be enough for many ordinary situations, such as keeping a phone nearby while listening, but walls and other obstructions can affect a wireless connection. ZJchao also provides bilateral stereo sound, a call function, music support, and a power display. The display is useful for checking remaining charge, though the sheet does not specify how precisely it reports the power in each earbud.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
The stated playtime is up to 3.5 hours, with up to 140 hours of standby time. For a basketball session, that gives ZJchao the longer listed continuous listening window of these two, though 3.5 hours is still a finite single-charge limit. The case has a 350 mAh battery, but no total listening time with case recharges is supplied. Skip ZJchao if your main priority is Bluetooth 5.4, a longer stated connection range, or microphones specifically described as noise cancelling.
LICAEVEY is the more activity-focused option on paper. Its clamp-on in-ear design is described as providing a snug, secure fit during workouts, and each earbud weighs 4.8 g. That is slightly heavier than ZJchao, but the more explicit attention to keeping the earbuds in place may matter more for someone moving around. For basketball, I would treat that fit description as a useful design cue, not a guarantee: the sheet does not establish how well the earbuds fit any particular person or how they perform through a full game.
The connectivity specification is Bluetooth 5.4, with a stated range of up to 15 meters. That exceeds ZJchao’s listed approximately 10 meters, although both figures are given under different levels of detail and real surroundings can affect wireless range. LICAEVEY also lists support for HSP, A2DP, and AVRCP protocols, plus compatibility with smartphones, tablets, and laptops. Its 10 mm speakers and dual-microphone noise-cancelling system are presented as features for listening and clearer calls in noisy surroundings. That is a microphone noise-cancellation claim; it does not establish that the earbuds actively cancel noise reaching your ears.
The case has a digital LED display for checking the reported remaining power of the case and earbuds. LICAEVEY lists up to 3 hours of continuous music or talk time per charge and says a full recharge takes about 1.5 hours. Those figures make charging time easy to plan around, but the listed single-charge playback is shorter than ZJchao’s. Skip LICAEVEY if you want the lightest earbuds here or put the longest stated playtime per charge ahead of fit and connectivity features.
• Best for lighter earbuds → ZJchao Earbuds. At 4.1 g per earbud, it is 0.7 g lighter than LICAEVEY’s 4.8 g.
• Best for longer stated single-charge playtime → ZJchao Earbuds. Its listed maximum is 3.5 hours, compared with LICAEVEY’s 3 hours.
• Best for newer Bluetooth connectivity → LICAEVEY BT 5.4. Its Bluetooth 5.4 specification is newer than ZJchao’s Bluetooth 5.1.
• Best for the longer stated connection range → LICAEVEY BT 5.4. It lists up to 15 meters; ZJchao lists approximately 10 meters in an open, obstacle-free environment.
• Best for a workout-oriented fit description → LICAEVEY BT 5.4. Its clamp-on design is specifically described as secure during workouts. ZJchao is described as lightweight and stable, but does not specify a clamp-on fit.
• Best for checking battery status at a glance → Tie. Both include a battery display in the case; LICAEVEY specifically describes an LED display for the case and each earbud.
• Best for noise-cancelling call microphones → LICAEVEY BT 5.4. Its sheet identifies a dual-microphone noise-cancelling system; ZJchao lists a call function but does not specify noise-cancelling microphones.
• Best for a straightforward, lightweight everyday option → ZJchao Earbuds. Its lighter weight and automatic pairing when the lid opens suit someone who values simple handling over newer connectivity features.
My Verdict
If I cared more about lower earbud weight and the longer stated playtime per charge, I’d choose ZJchao instead. Its advantages are concrete, but my pick for movement is LICAEVEY.
Neither product should be treated as a confirmed waterproof choice. The supplied details do not give an IP rating or explicitly state that either model is water-resistant. That matters for basketball, where sweat is part of the use case: without a supported water-resistance specification, I would not assume either is a waterproof true wireless earbud for basketball.
Charging also deserves a closer look before deciding. ZJchao lists a 350 mAh case battery and gives a charging-current figure, but does not state a USB-C connector. So I would not describe it as a confirmed USB C charging in ear headphones for basketball. LICAEVEY says its case can recharge the earbuds and gives a 1.5-hour full-recharge time, but its supplied details do not identify the charging port either.
Neither product is a foldable headset. Both are in-ear true wireless earbuds, so the phrase foldable headset for basketball describes a different kind of product. If you want something that folds for storage, these models do not offer that feature in the supplied specifications.
Finally, consider what the listed battery figures actually represent. ZJchao’s 3.5 hours and LICAEVEY’s 3 hours are maximum stated playback times per charge, not a guaranteed full-day total. ZJchao gives a standby figure, while LICAEVEY gives a case recharge time. Those are different kinds of information, so they do not establish which case will keep a full day’s listening going longer. If the port type, water resistance, or full case-powered listening time is essential, check the current product details on Amazon before making your choice.
LICAEVEY has the clearer workout-focused fit description: a clamp-on design intended to stay secure during exercise. ZJchao is lighter and lists a longer single-charge playback time. Neither sheet gives a water-resistance rating, so I would not assume either is suitable for heavy sweat or rain.
Do either of these earbuds have noise cancellation?
ZJchao lists up to 3.5 hours of playback, while LICAEVEY lists up to 3 hours of music or talk time. These are stated maximums, not guaranteed results. The supplied information does not provide directly comparable total listening time including case recharges.
If USB-C is a requirement, verify the port type in the current product information before choosing.
• how 1MORE SonoFlow Active Noise compares to QCY H3
• TrelaCo 200 vs Huikeya Noise Cancelling Ear: Soft Silicone
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.