Welcome to my website! I am a fifth-year Ph.D. Candidate in finance at the University of Arizona. I am on the 2025-2026 job market. My email is ggao@arizona.edu.
I am interested in understanding factors that drive economic agents’ decision making and the implications of these choices for investment performance, financial fragility, and firm value. I am passionate about generating novel insights in finance by integrating perspectives from information economics, labor economics, industrial organization, and law and economics. In terms of industries as my research settings, my current work covers hedge funds, mutual funds, insurance, and other alternative investments, including crypto investing and private equity.
Upcoming presentations in 2026: AFA (Philly); HKU Next-Gen Finance PhD Workshop
[1] AI Automation and Effort Allocation: Evidence from Sophisticated Investors
Do high-skilled workers exert more effort at human-intensive tasks in the AI era? I hypothesize that AI automates sophisticated investors’ machine-based information acquisition tasks, thereby shifting effort toward human-interaction-based ones. Using an event-study design and a shift-share IV strategy, I find a significant increase in hedge funds’ earnings call participation—along both extensive and intensive margins—following their adoption of automated downloads of SEC filings. Funds’ post-automation call attendance is associated with higher returns and more profitable stock trades. Overall, this study empirically identifies a novel effort-reallocation mechanism through which automation raises productivity for high-skilled workers performing partially automatable tasks.
Selected Presentations: HKU Next-Gen Finance PhD Workshop (2026); University of Arizona (2026, Econ Brown Bag); FMA Doctoral Student Consortium (2025); University of Arizona (2025); FMA Doctoral Student Consortium (2024, Proposal); FMA New Ideas Session (2023)
[2] Whom You Know Matters: Mutual Fund Workplace Networks and Investment Performance (with Charles Cao and Harry Guo)
Do investors rely on workplace networks and what organizational structures facilitate workplace information flows? We provide new insights by constructing a novel fund-level skill-weighted measure of interfund comanager connections (ICC). We find that funds with a higher ICC exhibit more similar portfolio holdings to connected funds. A higher ICC is also associated with better fund performance. We use plausibly exogenous superstar manager departures to pin down causality. Value-relevant information is transmitted: ICC funds profit more from trading on overlapped hard-to-research stocks and non-local stocks than non-ICC funds. We also present first evidence on the evolution of mutual fund workplace networks.
Selected Presentations: AFA (2026); CMU-Pitt-PSU Joint Conference (2025); University of Arkansas (2024); EasternFA (2024); University of Arizona (2023)
[3] Anatomy of a Crypto Bank Run (with Richard Sias)
We examine the behavior of over half a million depositors in the first major “cryptocurrency bank” run and failure. Our analysis highlights the fragility of cryptocurrency banks as (1) the deposits themselves are speculative assets subject to exogenous market events, (2) the likelihood of a run is a function of the depositor base and varies with depositor size, attention, personal experience, and ethnicity, and (3) the run is extremely concentrated—a mere 2% of depositors can account for the entire run. Given the quickly expanding integration of cryptocurrency and traditional markets, our results have important implications for policy and investors.
Selected presentations: NFA (2025); UD/Philly Fed Fintech and Financial Institutions Research Conference (2025)
[4] Prices versus Voices: Dissecting the Governance Epitome of Passive Investing
I provide novel evidence on the governance implications of passive investing through the lens of CEO turnover-performance sensitivity (TPS). I formulate competing hypotheses that passive ownership affects CEO TPS via less informative stock prices or stronger governance-related shareholder voices. Using Russell index reconstitutions to perform difference-in-discontinuity estimations and shock-based IV analyses, I show that the consistent positive relation between passive ownership and CEO TPS is likely causal, consistent with large passive voting blocks amplifying active shareholders’ ability to press for stronger governance. Poorly performing CEOs being replaced is seen as a bright side of passive ownership by the stock market.
Selected Presentations: International Corporate Governance Society-ASU (2024); FMA (2024); EasternFA (2024)
Conference Discussions:
EasternFA, How Do Life Insurers Manage Liquidity Risk, 2024 [Slides]
FMA, From Active to Passive: The Consequences for Demand Elasticity, 2024 [Slides]
FMA, Capital Concentration of the Bond Fund Industry and Bond Market Fragility, 2022 [Slides]
FMA, Investor Attention/Awareness and Learning Channels, 2022 [Slides]
GFC, AI Determinants of Success and Failure: The Case of Financial Statements, 2025 [Slides]