Yiming Liu
Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Economics and Finance
University College London
UCL School of Management
Email: yiming-liu[at]ucl[dot]ac[dot]uk
About me
Hello! I am a postdoctoral research fellow in Economics and finance at the University College London supervised by Professor Ming Yang. Prior to joining UCL, I earned my PhD in Economics from the University of Michigan, where I was advised by Professor Tilman Börgers.
I conduct research in economic theory and finance. In particular, I am interested in information acquisition, mechanism design, and market design.
Research
Working papers
Combinatorial Learning and Simple Strategy [paper]
"What kind of news do you want to hear, and when will a learning strategy be simple?"
This paper models a circumstance in which there are N conditionally independent experiments, but a decision maker (DM) can only examine at most K of them sequentially. An important feature of the information structure is that those experiments can give each state conclusive signals, and each can only be checked once, i.e. without replacement. I introduce a notion of ``simple strategy'', which allows DM to make decisions at each decision node only depending on partial information of the continuation decision tree. I show that in a 2-state-2-action setting, the optimal strategy is always a simple strategy. The optimal learning strategy also indicates that the DM's strategy may be distorted by some Blackwell-dominated information sources. In the generalized J-state-L-action setting, I give a sufficient and necessary condition under which the optimal strategy is simple when the DM has full learning capacity.
Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives in Rationalizability [Under Revision]
"Implementation problem in Rationalizability"
This paper studies one property, independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA), on the solution concept of strategic games. I focus on the solution concept of rationalizability, and give the necessary and sufficient conditions for IIA to be satisfied in games solved by rationalizability. I discuss two versions of rationalizability in games with complete and incomplete information. In these two circumstances, I focus on supermodular games and give the necessary conditions for IIA to be satisfied in a supermodular game under rationalizability.
Sequential Screening and First-best Outcome [Under Revision]
How to induce customers to reveal their information?
This paper explores the trade-off faced by buyers seeking information about products before making a purchase, especially when acquiring more information risks leaking their private information. Different from Chapter 1, which studies a single decision maker's learning problem, this chapter also studies how two agents strategically interact under a bilateral trade market. By allowing the seller to design and sell a menu of experiments, the seller can infer the buyer's private information through this screening mechanism. The seller then sets a monopoly price based on the chosen experiment. Crucially, the seller only observes which experiment the buyer purchases, not the exact realized signal. This study characterizes the seller's first-best outcome and uses it as a benchmark, investigating all conditions under which the seller's first-best outcome can be implemented through the optimal experiment, with a detailed analysis in the binary value case.
Work in progress
Matching Market for Complementary Information
Complex Signals
Teaching (as Graduate Student Instructor)
Mathematics for Economists (Ph.D. level): 2020
Microeconomics Theory (I,III) (Ph.D. level): 2021,2023
Microeconomics Theory (II,IV) (Ph.D. level): 2019, 2021, 2022
Intermediate Macroeconomics (Undergraduate level): 2019
Introduction to Econometrics (Undergraduate level): 2020
Introduction to Microeconomic Theory (Undergraduate level): 2020
Game Theory (Undergraduate level): 2023