If you want a feature-rich case and a stated longer total listening time for zoom calls, choose Xmenha Tws; if you need earbuds with a defined bass driver, environmental noise reduction, and a more compact Bluetooth range figure, choose DCHK Haribo. For calls, Xmenha’s case offers more controls at hand, while DCHK lists ENC noise reduction as a call-focused feature.
Xmenha Tws vs DCHK Haribo at a Glance
• Xmenha Tws strength: Its case screen can show earbud and case battery levels, adjust sound modes and volume, display the time, and set alarms. Trade-off: Its listed earbud playtime is about five hours per charge.
• DCHK Haribo strength: Its 13 mm dynamic drivers are specified for bass-focused listening, and ENC noise reduction is listed. Trade-off: The feature list does not provide a detailed breakdown of total playback time with the case.
• Xmenha Tws: Better suited to buyers who want more settings and battery information on the charging case.
• DCHK Haribo: Better suited to buyers who prioritize a bass-oriented sound profile, automatic pairing, and a distinctive gummy-bear design.
• For zoom calls: Xmenha highlights call clarity and a built-in microphone; DCHK specifically lists environmental noise reduction.
Xmenha’s most distinctive feature is its touchscreen charging case. It is designed to put useful controls and status information on the case itself: you can check the battery levels of both earbuds and the case, adjust volume and sound-effect modes, see the time, and set alarms without taking out your phone. That may appeal if you often want to check battery status or make an adjustment between tasks without opening a phone app.
The earbuds use an in-ear design and are described as small, light, and comfortable, with an ear-clip design intended to help them stay in place during movement. The product information also describes them as sweatproof against everyday sweat and rain, making them a reasonable option to consider for workouts or outdoor activity. The stated Bluetooth version is 5.4, with a listed range of about 10 meters in an unobstructed setting. For zoom calls, Xmenha lists a built-in microphone and says its call processing is intended to reduce external noise. Those are relevant features, though the sheet does not provide microphone test results or a call-specific battery estimate.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-23 · 8 min read · Independent comparison
Battery figures need a little care. The listed playtime is about five hours, while the product information separately gives a 30-hour battery average life. Those figures may refer to different use conditions or charging across the case, but the sheet does not explain the relationship. I would treat five hours as the clearer single-session figure and avoid assuming that 30 hours means continuous listening without recharging. A USB-C charging port is listed, and the listed battery charge time is five hours.
Who should skip it: Skip Xmenha if a quick recharge matters most; its listed battery charge time is five hours, and the sheet does not specify fast charging.
DCHK Haribo is the more straightforward choice if sound character and simple everyday pairing matter more to you than a screen on the case. It uses 13 mm dynamic drivers, and the product description emphasizes bass for genres such as rock, hip-hop, and EDM. That points toward a listening profile aimed at fuller low-end sound, rather than a list of adjustable sound modes like Xmenha’s case provides. The sheet does not give a separate equalizer or sound-mode feature.
Its Bluetooth 5.3 connection supports automatic pairing when you take the earbuds out of the case. That can make routine use simpler if you want to put them in and connect without going through a manual pairing process each time. DCHK lists Bluetooth audio codecs SBC and AAC, plus A2DP, AVRCP, HFP, and HSP profiles. It also lists touch controls for music and calls, and support for Siri and Bixby. The listed wireless range is 32.8 feet.
For calls, DCHK identifies environmental noise cancellation, or ENC, as a feature. That gives shoppers a specific call-related noise-reduction feature to compare with Xmenha’s call-clarity description. The sheet does not state how much background sound ENC reduces or provide a microphone performance test, so it is best read as a feature to consider rather than a guarantee of clear calls in every environment. The earbuds are also listed with an IPX4 rating, a useful detail for people considering them for workouts or exposure to splashes. The charging connection is USB-C, with a stated full charge time of 1.5 hours; the listed earbud battery life is five hours.
The yellow Haribo-themed design is a notable part of the package, and the included items list three sizes of ear tips, a charging case, a USB-C-to-USB-A cable, and a user manual. That gives buyers more than one tip size to try for fit, though the sheet does not specify earbud dimensions or claim that the design suits every ear.
Who should skip it: Skip DCHK if you specifically want a touchscreen case for battery checks, alarms, and on-case sound adjustments.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for stated bass-focused listening → DCHK Haribo. Its 13 mm dynamic drivers are the clearest sound-related specification, with the description emphasizing bass-heavy genres.
• Best for a shorter listed full-charge time → DCHK Haribo. Its stated charging time is 1.5 hours, compared with five hours listed for Xmenha.
• Best for a stated sport-suitable design → DCHK Haribo, narrowly. It has an IPX4 rating; Xmenha is described as sweatproof against everyday sweat and rain, but its sheet does not give an IP rating.
• Best for a listed call-focused noise feature → DCHK Haribo. ENC is explicitly named. Xmenha also describes call noise suppression and a built-in microphone, but does not identify ENC.
• Best for case-visible battery status → Xmenha Tws. The touchscreen case is specifically described as showing battery levels for the earbuds and case.
• Best for automatic connection after removal → DCHK Haribo. Auto pairing is listed as a convenience feature.
• Best for someone who wants a longer stated overall battery figure → Xmenha Tws, with a caveat. Its product information lists 30 hours, but also states about five hours of playtime; the sheet does not clarify how those figures relate.
For zoom calls, do not assume that a call-related feature alone settles the choice. Xmenha lists a built-in microphone and call noise suppression; DCHK lists environmental noise cancellation. Neither sheet supplies a call-runtime figure, measured voice quality, or a specific performance result in a noisy room. If you take long meetings, the five-hour earbud playtime listed for each product is worth keeping in mind, while the case and charging details may matter between calls.
Fit and controls are another practical distinction. Xmenha’s small-ear positioning and ear-clip description may be appealing if you want a stable fit for movement, but the sheet does not provide several ear-tip sizes. DCHK includes three sizes of ear tips, which gives you options to try for fit, and it has touch controls for calls and music. If you want to adjust settings without reaching for your phone, Xmenha’s screen has the more detailed set of listed case functions.
For sports, the descriptions offer different kinds of reassurance rather than identical specifications. DCHK has an IPX4 rating, while Xmenha is described as sweatproof against everyday sweat and rain. If you are searching for the best sports earbuds for zoom calls, weigh that activity-related information alongside the call features and fit details; neither product sheet establishes call quality during exercise. Likewise, shoppers looking for the best noise canceling neckband headphones for zoom calls should note that these are both in-ear wireless earbuds, not neckband headphones. Their listed noise-control features are not the same as a full set of specifications for a dedicated neckband model.
My Verdict
In my opinion, I would choose Xmenha Tws for zoom calls if I valued its case screen, built-in microphone, and stated call-noise suppression more than a quicker charging time. The case’s battery and settings display also gives it a practical advantage for someone managing calls alongside everyday listening. I would choose DCHK instead for its shorter listed charge time, 13 mm bass-focused drivers, ENC feature, and IPX4 rating. My recommendation is Xmenha, with the important caveat that its five-hour charge-time figure is less convenient.
FAQ
Which is better for zoom calls, Xmenha Tws or DCHK Haribo?
Xmenha describes noise suppression during calls and lists sound isolation as its noise-control type. DCHK lists environmental noise cancellation. The sheets do not establish active noise cancelling for either product across all listening situations.
DCHK lists a full charge time of 1.5 hours. Xmenha’s product information lists a five-hour battery charge time, so DCHK has the shorter stated charging time.
DCHK has an IPX4 rating, while Xmenha is described as sweatproof against everyday sweat and rain and has an ear-clip design intended to keep the earbuds stable during movement. Those details may help guide a choice, but neither sheet supplies workout test results.
• BluDento BLT-HD LDAC/aptX Lossless vs HomeSpot JY300
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.