If you want compact in-ear earbuds with a visible case battery display and a stated 4–5 hours of playtime, choose Xmenha TWS True; if you need a hook-style fit, a longer stated Bluetooth range, and IPX7 protection, choose Groove Earbuds. For video calls, Xmenha’s call-focused microphones and noise-reduction feature make it the more clearly specified option.
Xmenha TWS True vs Groove Earbuds at a Glance
• Xmenha TWS True: Its strengths are the compact in-ear design, two microphones with ambient-noise reduction for calls, and a case with an LED battery display. Its trade-off is a stated 4–5 hours of playtime per charge.
• Groove Earbuds: Its strengths are the hook-style fit, IPX7 water protection, and a stated 15-meter Bluetooth range. Its trade-off is that the product information does not give a precise playtime figure beyond a broad long-battery claim.
• For video calls: Xmenha provides more detail about its microphone and call-noise handling; Groove claims clear calls but gives fewer specifics about how it handles background sound.
• For workouts: Both are described as water-resistant choices for exercise. Groove lists IPX7 protection, while Xmenha lists IPX6 protection for the earbuds and charging case.
• Choose Xmenha TWS True if a small in-ear shape, touch controls, and a glanceable case display fit your routine.
• Choose Groove Earbuds if you prefer ear hooks and want the stated longer wireless range.
Xmenha TWS True is a compact in-ear option for someone who wants earbuds that sit inside the ear rather than loop over it. The description says the earbuds are designed for small ears and lists a weight of 0.3 ounces. That positioning may appeal to people who find larger earphones uncomfortable, though the provided information does not specify multiple ear-tip sizes or a fit-adjustment system.
For calls, the more useful details are its two microphones and ambient-noise cancellation technology. The product information says the microphones monitor surrounding sound and reduce background noise during calls. That makes Xmenha the more specifically described choice for someone whose day includes remote meetings, quick calls from a shared space, or conversations while moving around. It is a reasonable candidate for people searching for the best headphones for video calls, but the specifications do not establish how it will perform in every room or noise level.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-22 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
The stated playtime is about 4–5 hours, with up to 45 hours of continuous playback when the charging case is included. The case has an LED display showing its remaining power, and its listed battery capacity is 800mAh. The case is also described as able to provide an emergency phone charge. Bluetooth 5.3 and a listed 10-meter range round out the core features. IPX6 protection is specified for both the earbuds and case, which suits sweat and unexpected rain according to the product description.
Who should skip it: Skip Xmenha if you prefer an over-ear hook fit or need a clearly stated single-charge listening time longer than 4–5 hours.
Groove takes a different approach to fit. Its product information lists an over-ear placement and a hook-shaped earpiece, with plastic and silicone materials. That shape is worth considering if you want an earbud that hooks around the ear rather than relying only on an in-ear form. The listed control method is a push button, unlike Xmenha’s touch controls, so your preference for a physical press versus a touch surface may help settle the choice.
For exercise, Groove specifies IPX7 water protection and describes the earbuds as intended for use around rain and sweat. Xmenha also lists protection against water, but Groove’s stated IPX7 level is the higher of the two ratings provided here. That makes Groove a particularly relevant option for a workout routine where water protection is a priority.
Groove uses Bluetooth 5.3 and lists a 15-meter Bluetooth range, compared with Xmenha’s stated 10 meters. That extra stated range could be useful when you step away from a paired device, though walls and other obstacles may affect any wireless connection. Groove also claims extended battery life and clear calls, but it does not provide an exact listening time in the supplied details. Its specifications list a 14-hour charging time, which is a notable planning consideration: confirm what that figure means for your intended charging routine before relying on quick turnarounds. Groove is pitched toward people who value a hook-style fit, a longer listed range, and stronger stated water protection.
Who should skip it: Skip Groove if you need a clearly specified per-charge playtime or want detailed information about microphone noise reduction for calls.
• Best for a compact in-ear design → Xmenha TWS True. Its description emphasizes a small, lightweight form, while Groove uses a hook-style, over-ear placement.
• Best for a hook-style fit → Groove Earbuds. The product information lists an over-ear arrangement and a hook-shaped earpiece.
• Best for a case battery display → Xmenha TWS True. Its charging case displays the remaining charge as a percentage, making it easier to check the case before leaving.
• Best for a stated Bluetooth range → Groove Earbuds. Groove lists 15 meters; Xmenha lists about 10 meters. Neither figure guarantees the same range through walls or other obstacles.
• Best for detailed call-noise features → Xmenha TWS True. It specifies two microphones and ambient-noise reduction. Groove describes calls as clear but offers fewer technical details about background-noise handling.
• Best for the higher stated water-protection rating → Groove Earbuds. It lists IPX7, while Xmenha lists IPX6 for both the earbuds and charging case.
• Best for a clearly stated earbud playtime → Xmenha TWS True. Its stated 4–5 hours per charge and up to 45 hours with the case are more specific than Groove’s general long-battery claims.
• Best for push-button controls → Groove Earbuds. Xmenha instead uses touch controls for functions such as calls, volume, and voice assistance.
My Verdict
I would choose Xmenha TWS True for video calls because its two-microphone setup and ambient-noise reduction are described more concretely than Groove’s general clear-call claim. The case display and stated 4–5-hour earbud playtime also make its everyday charging routine easier to understand.
I’d choose Groove instead if an ear hook, IPX7 protection, or a 15-meter listed range is more important to you. But for my call-focused pick, Xmenha gives me the clearer case.
Before choosing, think about which fit and controls you are more likely to use comfortably. Xmenha is an in-ear design with touch controls; Groove has a hook-style fit and push-button controls. The product details do not provide a direct fit comparison or a full set of ear-tip options, so neither design can be assumed to suit every ear.
Battery claims also need a careful read. Xmenha gives a per-charge estimate and a total figure that includes its case. Groove describes its battery life as extended but does not list a precise playtime in the supplied information. Its listed 14-hour charging time is another point to clarify if you expect to recharge often. If long listening between charges is your main concern, that missing exact playtime makes a direct comparison difficult.
Water protection is not the same as a guarantee against every kind of exposure. Groove lists IPX7, while Xmenha lists IPX6 and specifies that its case shares that rating. Both are positioned for workouts, but the ratings alone do not establish how either product will perform under every use condition. For video meetings, give extra weight to the call information: Xmenha identifies its microphone arrangement and noise reduction, while Groove’s call claim is less detailed. Neither sheet provides enough information to establish either pair as the best noise cancelling earbuds for video calls; Xmenha’s listed feature is specifically described for reducing background noise during calls.
Xmenha is the more clearly documented call-focused option. Its specifications describe two microphones and ambient-noise reduction during calls, while Groove says calls are clear without the same level of detail.
Xmenha lists about 4–5 hours of playback from the earbuds and up to 45 hours with the charging case. Groove makes a general extended-battery claim but does not provide a comparable exact playtime figure in the supplied information.
Are Groove Earbuds more water-resistant than Xmenha TWS True?
Choose Groove if its hook-style fit and IPX7 rating match your priorities. Choose Xmenha if you prefer a compact in-ear style and want a case that also has a stated IPX6 rating. Both are described as suitable for exercise.
• YUEHEMEI Clip-On Open Ear vs GNZUQ Open Ear Earbuds
• LITTOAK Computer Speakers vs DAGKHE Sleep Headphones
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.