Word Search Game Free Download For Pc Windows 10 [EXCLUSIVE]

I'm trying to search through a lot of files using Windows' file browser search function. The problem is, when I search for something, it only shows files with the keyword at the beginning of a word or immediately after an underscore.

However, it wouldn't bring up words like "educational" or "application", because the keyword is in the middle of that word. Is there a way to search for all occurences of a keyword in Windows 10?

Word Search Game Free Download For Pc Windows 10

DOWNLOAD 🔥 https://urlgoal.com/2y2EZu 🔥

For a GUI based solution, I highly recommend using Agent Ransack for this purpose. I have not had much luck using the built-in search features of Windows since Windows 7, but Agent Ransack provides many more powerful options for searching the contents and names of files.

So if I type in "creat*" as a search term, it will find "create," "created," "creates," "creating," "creator," "creative," "creature," etc. But if I type in "*reat" it won't find anything. In fact, when I start typing, it searches for words beginning with all the characters I've typed as I type them. Putting * at the beginning of the search term is the same as putting nothing; i.e., "*rea" and "rea" will both find "real," "reality," "read," etc., but will not find "create," "treat," "breathe," etc.

Aside from missing this feature, searching in EN is actually pretty good and you should hopefully not have to export your notes to search them. Can you provide an example of this and maybe we can offer some suggestions or work arounds.

That is what I've noticed as well, beginning word partials seems to work AFAIK ok. I leave off the trailing asterisk, it doesn't seem to matter. I did some additional testing after posting the response above and interestingly if I search for some characters within a word without the asterisk it would sometimes work, but appears to be very inconsistent and incomplete.

In the example mentioned - if I realized that I could remember localdb, but not sqllocaldb, then I would add localdb as a keyword assist for future searches. I'd also add a tag.

I would be concerned with the work required to index every possible sequential group of letters in every word in my 40,000+ notes and still be searchable with my phone. I doubt partial internal character or partial number search will be supported anytime soon.

No No. This is a very poor workaround. If I am pasting a note of 500 words, I am not going to create 500 tags. Evernote should be able to search like a text editor search. Just go through all the words. Indexing is used for instant searches. Machines are very fast now. Character by character searches is a none performance issue. All text editors do it and results is almost instantaneous. I would rather wait for a couple seconds to get a result than a non searchable software.

Saved indexes and plain dumb searches can go hand on hand. They compliment each other. Not replace each other.

Not remembering the exact words has happened to me as well and when I do eventually find the note I just add the first couple of keywords that I first tried to the title so that next time I'll find it quicker. I could probably avoid this even more with more careful tagging but it happens so seldom and finding the forgotten note never takes that long, that, at least for me, the keyword approach is the way to go.

Well, this request for internal partial character searches has been mentioned in this forum a few times over the past 7 years. Honestly, I think you will be waiting a long time for Evernote to re-write their multiplatform software codes for a request that does not seem to have a lot of support from the users.

I can certainly understand the desire for this type of searching. If it were just a matter of searching the local version of the notes database ("like a text editor"), it probably wouldn't be hard to implement. But with devices other than desktop or laptop computers, it might get more difficult. My understanding is that on smartphones, the database is not stored locally, so that searching has to be done on the Evernote servers. (Or perhaps on a locally-created index? Someone please correct my ignorance here!) I presume the "scalability reasons on the service" to which the search grammar article so cryptically refers have to do with this limitation.

Yeah, that's useful... You've got a weird functionality gap (multi tag search, not any partial character string), that used to be available, is still available on some versions of the system, users are confused and repeatedly wondering why this is or when it might be remedied, then I come along proposing that it is because of the numerous disconnected feature requests not getting enough traction, I post to a variety of threads asking people to hop on board one particular request so that it can gain some momentum... and you are going to report me for spamming?

I agree with all the others. It is ridiculous that you cannot do a partial search. I have thousands of receipts in my system, with long sku numbers. To be able to do partial number look up is crucial.

Also agree. I always preach the benefits and power of the Evernote search engine among my clients and discover this has been surprising.

That's how I found this lack:

I was searching for a car plate license (8827HCB). I did not remember the first numbers, but was sure about the letters, so I looked for HCB with no results. I was sure of having that particular note inside my database!!

For my total bewilderment, then I did another test. I searched for len and got many notes that contained words like Allen, Length or pollen ...

All the notes involved (including the license plate of the car) have been in my database for years and I do not see any apparent technical or syntactic difference in them.

I explained the case to Evernote support but they sent me to the well-known advanced syntax page.

I don't know what sort index is exactly. Evernote needs to find EVERYTHING. Just like any decent text editor does. Give me the option to do a text search without using any indexes. Just go through ALL the text. I don't care how slow it will be. I would rather wait 3 more seconds than not finding what I want. I don't have hundreds of thousands of notes where I am going to worry about performance and even then I would rather wait. Computers are very fast these days. People want to find notes. Let me worry about performance, not Evernote.

Call me crazy, but I find that perhaps the most important thing that a note-taking app can do is provide the ability search those notes. Not the search speed. The lack of partial search means, that Evernote is useless for technical notes.

I strongly suspect there are many, many, more none-technical people who could use this feature, but either don't know the correct technical jargon required to find the forum post, or simply don't realize it's a feature they could ask for. Most of my technically... let's say "inexperienced", older coworkers and many other professionals I know don't even realize that poor search performance is a design decision rather than just evernote "not working that way".

That said, my workaround has always been to make notes with multiple identifying words at the top (not tags, just like a brief summary at the top). Sometimes when I forget one word I can find the note in question by searching for related terms and sorting through the hopefully brief list of results.

The frustrating thing about this is that partial word search already exists within Evernote, but it only works for search within note (Ctrl-F). They simply need to allow this pre-existing search engine (or whatever programmers call it) to search the entire database.

As I understand it, the standard search grammar (the one that allows for tag, notebook, reminder, etc. as well as literal text) runs its text search against an index that's created specifically for matching word prefixes in all of your notes. This makes search a lot faster, but doesn't really scale to infix searches.

That being said, it would be nice to have the ability to override that behavior in the search language (example: the presence of a leading '*' in the text string would be an easy case, since '*''s aren't matched literally), and let the user take the time penalty. For large note databases, that would be a lot slower., since they have to access the text for each note, rather than the pre-built indexes. Searching individual notes in parallel would probably help some with that. ff782bc1db