Wisconsin (and Minnesota) Candidacy Withdrawal (phase III is next)

May 31, 2022: I've withdrawn my Wisconsin candidacy before the filing deadline today. This is okay, just as it was in Ohio, and I'll also have more to add later about Wisconsin. My campaign -- which is about, first and foremost, disbarring the bar; that is, eradicate the corrupt lawyer monopoly -- is going forward and making progress, even this very minute. I'll take the next step very soon. Monopolies -- concentrations of power -- must be everybody's focus ("everybody" who values actual, not illusory, freedom and justice to any degree). Monopolies and their corruption are always the problem. You can read about Lord Acton, the band that opened for Three Dog Night on the road in the early 70’s. Lord Acton was comprised of the three surviving members of the Five Man Electrical Band. The unfortunate two had been electrocuted reconfiguring a neon sign.

I've decided not to run for a House seat in Minnesota. The principal attraction of the MN01 race was the prospect of running against Minneapolis/UMN lawyer Richard Painter, though in a different party. He came in 3rd, behind the young woman, Sara. To the extent that my calling out Painter for his demagoguery and near-single-minded focus on one person, DJT, contributed to his weak performance compared to his enormous press exposure -- my efforts were successful; and I do think they contributed. It looks unlikely that a lawyer will be competitive in MN01. This is good. MN07, Fischbach, has been in only one term. Even though she's a lawyer, it's hard -- and basically premature, so it's not a good idea -- not to give her four years to come up with at least one specific, real solution, though no lawyer will attack the root cause of all our major problems, the lawyer monopoly. MN06, Emmer, has been there six years, but for various strategic reasons, I'm going to pass on it. I had been considering MN05, but this Royce fellow seems very good to go up against Omar. Minneapolis and its lawyer-mob -- which includes the Star-Tribune -- needs to be approached very strategically. I'm hardly through exposing the corrupt Minneapolis mob of incompetent and corrupt judges and lawyers -- mobsters including the Star-Tribune.

I view Mr. Painter's 3rd place, given his huge exposure, as pretty significant. His mania against DJT made him just as shallow as the Trumpstampers in Ohio. They were even bigger suckers than Painter, as they dropped millions just to have the rug pulled out from under them.

As I've written, DJT's first two years were the best things that happened with the presidency EVER -- yes ever: he attacked sacrosanct institutions. One has to rank these things relative to at least a few things: #1) how far away from the 1789 origin our random walk through history has taken us; #2) how long the bugs in the Constitution have had to propagate through goverment and society (allied to the random walk); #3) the evolution of transporation and communication -- the two principal drivers out of the caves and into civilization, with communication augmenting our freedom under Am1, and with transportation augmenting our freedom to travel to, among other places (and petition), the "seat" of government to get them off the pot and from sh*tting on our rights; #4) external threats such as ICBMs (a subset of transportation). In other words, these things were small and essentially insignificant in the early 1800s; our random walk hadn't gone so far from the origin. So comparing Jefferson, for example, to a 21st century president makes no sense; TJ swam in a different ocean on a different planet from the 21st century.

The ossified institutions of Congress and the courts (especially the courts) needed real shellacking, as they never have had before. Neither Jefferson nor anyone else could have done what DJT did. However, DJT should have made a reasonably-significant gear-change for his second half. It is very unlikely that the same strategy -- in nearly anything dealing with large populations of people -- will be effective longer than two years. This is the non-ergodicity issue I've mentioned. DJT's strategy post November 2020 should have been modified, as well -- even if he had won.

Our form of government -- with our remarkable but very buggy Constitution -- has no place for sacrosanct institutions, which DJT attached right out of the blocks. We have sacrosanct, hallowed ground -- such as in Arlington; and now at the Robb Elementary School, God bless those angels -- but institutions cannot be sacrosanct. They are made of administrators who -- no matter how competent they might be (if you get real lucky -- are simply buildings and bureaucrats. The courts are more of the same, only rotten to the core with corruption. DJT attacked the courts. That was and is something no lawyer or person in Congress (essentially the same group) will do: in large part due to the ABA's code of silence -- model rule 8.2, adopted by every state bar.

I'll have much more on this coming up. Monopolies -- concentrations of power -- are the problem. The lawyer monopoly-mob is THE principal problem. (The infinite-money-printing monopoly -- the FED -- is the other big problem, but the lawyer monopoly is easily solvable.) End the Dues Process. GROTFL. Get Rid of The Fokken (it's Dutch) Lawyers.