We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-09-25 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
If you want a retro-styled, customizable pair of Bluetooth headphones with swappable ear cushions and a quick low-latency connection, choose We Are Rewind EQ-001; if you need marathon battery life, wired backup, and dual-device switching for travel and all-day listening, choose Uliptz Headphones Over Ear.
• We Are Rewind EQ-001 — biggest strength: a genuinely distinctive retro design with three interchangeable ear cushions (orange, yellow, black) plus three EQ modes and a low 40 ms latency figure for its Bluetooth 5.1 connection.
• We Are Rewind EQ-001 — biggest trade-off: 12 hours of battery, no wired jack, and no noise control at all, so it's a shorter-session, lifestyle-first headphone.
• Uliptz Headphones Over Ear — biggest strength: 65 hours of playtime, Bluetooth 6.0 with a 10-minute quick charge giving 4 hours, a 3.5 mm wired fallback, and dual-device connection.
• Uliptz Headphones Over Ear — biggest trade-off: 248 ms latency is high for real-time gaming or video editing, passive-only noise cancellation, and a more conventional look with a 1-year warranty.
• Pick the We Are Rewind EQ-001 if style, retro character, and low-latency wireless matter most to you.
• Pick the Uliptz Headphones Over Ear if you want maximum battery, wired flexibility, and everyday practicality for commuting, office, and travel.
The EQ-001 is a lifestyle headphone first and a spec-sheet headphone second. Its headline feature is the design: a black retro-styled over-ear frame that ships with three interchangeable ear cushions in orange, yellow, and black. That's a real, tangible difference from most headphones in this category, which ask you to pick a color once and live with it. If you like the idea of a pair that looks like a piece of audio nostalgia rather than a generic black slab, this is the entire pitch.
On the technical side, the EQ-001 runs Bluetooth 5.1 with a 33-foot range and a 40 ms latency figure — notably low for a Bluetooth headphone, which matters if you're watching video or playing casual games and don't want audio drifting out of sync with the picture. You get three EQ modes (Signature, Balanced, Bass Boost), a single "GO" button for playback and calls, a double-click mic function for Siri or Google Assistant, a built-in digital MEMS microphone, and 40 mm dynamic drivers with a 20 Hz–20 kHz range at 32 ohms. Weight is listed at just 0.1 kg, which is extremely light, and the adjustable headband plus soft cushions are aimed at comfortable extended wear. Battery is 12 hours over a 2-hour charge via micro USB.
Uliptz Headphones Over Ear: Who It's For
The Uliptz WH203A is built around endurance and flexibility. The 65-hour battery life on a single charge is the defining number, and the low-power-consumption chip behind it means you're charging this thing roughly once a week under normal use, not every couple of days. There's also a quick-charge behavior worth noting: a 10-minute charge yields about 4 hours of play, which is exactly the kind of thing that saves you when you grab them on the way out the door. A full charge takes 2.5 hours.
Connectivity is where it pulls ahead of the EQ-001 for practical use. Bluetooth 6.0 with a claimed 1–3 second pairing time, a memory function that auto-reconnects on power-up, and the ability to hold two devices at once — so you can be watching something on a laptop and still take a phone call without re-pairing. If Bluetooth isn't available or the battery is flat, the included 3.5 mm audio cable turns it into a wired headphone, which is a genuine safety net the EQ-001 simply doesn't have.
Comfort and fit are clearly prioritized: memory foam ear cups that the brand says filter more than 50% of ambient sound, an adjustable metal slider headband, rotatable ear muffs, and a foldable compact design for throwing in a bag. Weight is 180 g. Six EQ modes cover balanced, deep bass, and crisp treble profiles, driven by 40 mm dynamic drivers at 32 ohms with a 20 kHz frequency response and 122 dB sensitivity. Noise control is passive only — no active cancellation — and audio latency is listed at 248 ms, which is fine for music and calls but not ideal for competitive gaming or tight audio-video sync work. Warranty is 1 year, and the listed color is blue with a soft carrying case.
Who should buy it: commuters, students, office workers, and travelers who want one headphone that lasts, folds up, works wired or wireless, and hops between devices. Who should skip it: anyone who needs low-latency performance for gaming or editing, wants active noise cancellation, or prefers a retro, customizable aesthetic. The teen age range description and the 1-year warranty are also worth weighing against the EQ-001's adult orientation and 2-year coverage.
• Best for battery life → Uliptz Headphones Over Ear. 65 hours versus 12 hours is not a close contest.
• Best for retro style and customization → We Are Rewind EQ-001. Three swappable ear cushions and a distinctly nostalgic frame.
• Best for low-latency video and casual gaming → We Are Rewind EQ-001. 40 ms is far better than the Uliptz's 248 ms.
• Best for wired listening or battery-dead emergencies → Uliptz Headphones Over Ear. The 3.5 mm cable keeps it usable indefinitely.
• Best for switching between two devices → Uliptz Headphones Over Ear. Dual-device connection is built in.
• Best for travel and packing → Uliptz Headphones Over Ear. Foldable body with a soft carrying case.
• Best for EQ fine-tuning → Uliptz Headphones Over Ear. Six modes against the EQ-001's three.
• Best warranty coverage → We Are Rewind EQ-001. Two years versus one.
• Best for owning a cassette player ecosystem → We Are Rewind EQ-001. It's designed to pair with the WE-001.
In my opinion, most people shopping between these two should buy the Uliptz Headphones Over Ear. The 65-hour battery, wired fallback, dual-device connection, foldable build, and six EQ modes make it the more useful object day to day — it's the pair you stop thinking about. I'd only steer you to the We Are Rewind EQ-001 if the retro look and interchangeable cushions genuinely excite you, or if you specifically need that 40 ms latency for video and light gaming and value the longer warranty. Those are real reasons, but they're narrower ones. If price is your deciding factor, check the current price on Amazon before committing, since that's the one thing a spec sheet can't tell you.
Not universally. The Uliptz wins on battery (65 vs 12 hours), wired backup, dual-device pairing, and EQ options. The EQ-001 wins on latency (40 ms vs 248 ms), swappable cushions, retro design, and warranty length (2 years vs 1). It depends entirely on which of those you actually use.
The Uliptz Headphones Over Ear, by a wide margin — 65 hours versus 12 hours for the EQ-001. The Uliptz also charges fully in 2.5 hours versus 2 hours, and a 10-minute top-up gives roughly 4 hours of playback.
Only the Uliptz. It includes a 3.5 mm audio cable for non-Bluetooth devices and for listening when the battery is empty. The We Are Rewind EQ-001 is Bluetooth-only — there's no headphone jack listed.
Neither has active noise cancellation. The Uliptz lists passive noise cancellation via its memory foam ear cups, which the brand says filters more than 50% of ambient sound. The EQ-001 lists no noise control at all, so isolation depends purely on the cushion fit.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.
See also: Xmenha Gaming Open Ear vs Conyat Open-Ear Headphones, JLab Cloud White Bundle vs BUGANI Open Ear Headphones, Konohan 100 vs YFSFQS Class Set Headphones: On Ear