In my earlier post, I noted that I became a target once again. My email, containing all my contacts, phone bookmarks, and more, was compromised. Fortunately, my bank accounts are secure, preserving my millions and billions neatly stashed away under my pillow. Alas, no hacking saga would be complete without a blow to my YouTube account. They injected content violating community guidelines, leading to its instant termination.

I communicated with Google, and they agree that my account experienced unauthorised access. They are currently working on recovering it. To be transparent, I am not particularly eager to have it restored. The viewership was minimal, even below the standards of poorly performing channels. I acknowledge that the content quality was subpar; additional equipment like a wall-mounted monitor for better camera setup, improved lighting, and proper audio was necessary. Moreover, having the luxury of extra time for proper filming was a challenge. The sheer magnitude of work required to handle these aspects properly raises the question: is the effort invested truly worthwhile? Or is it merely contributing to the realm of free entertainment?


Waste My Time Mp3 Download Audio


Download File 🔥 https://urlca.com/2yGatI 🔥



The Promise of YouTube: YouTube offers an unprecedented platform for individuals to express themselves, share their talents, and connect with a global audience. Many creators have found success, turning their channels into lucrative businesses and enjoying the perks of online fame. The allure of potential fame, fortune, and the joy of doing what you love is a driving force for many aspiring content creators.

The Challenges: Despite the promises, the road to success on YouTube is riddled with challenges. The platform is highly saturated, with millions of creators vying for attention. Algorithms, constantly evolving trends, and the unpredictability of viewer preferences can make it difficult to gain traction. Moreover, the time and effort required to produce quality content, engage with an audience, and stay consistent can be overwhelming.

The Rewards Beyond Numbers: Despite the challenges, many content creators find intrinsic rewards beyond metrics like views and subscribers. Building a community, inspiring others, and honing creative skills are often cited as fulfilling aspects of content creation. The journey itself, with its ups and downs, can be a valuable learning experience that goes beyond the pursuit of fame or fortune.

I have appreciated some of your insights into woodworking, I dont really identify myself as a wood worker, however I do A LOT of it, lots of unusual projects and in many ways. So yes, your perfectly right, we only need to reference ourselves to practices and sharpening so many times, for many Youtube has become the mentor. I am glad to hear your perspective from your experiences on your Youtube content.

I've been building a dedicated audio PC test bed for over 6 months now. Each step of the way has made an incremental improvement, from introducing an externally-powered PPA USB V3, to getting the SSD off the power circuit, to going completely fanless to most recently bringing in a linear ATX power supply.

Than last week I bought a iGalvanic 3.0 to test out -- I mainly wanted to see how it stacked up against my other conditioners. So, doing some testing on my main, non-audio PC...I could tell NO DIFFERENCE between the iGalvanic and other devices. Indeed, I could tell no difference between conditioned and non-conditioned AT ALL. That was strange and worrying to me. I tried to find the reason for this phenomena, and ended up with this:

This PC has no conditioning, isolation or cleaning done to it whatsoever. It's running an open-loop liquid cooling rig with a pump and three large radiator fans, a GTX 1070, a SSD and a M.2 Ultra drive. Its plugged into the same power bar as the monitor and my audio PC's SSD power line (in an effort to dump the noise off my audio circuit). The PSU was not selected for low ripple characteristics but to be as cheap as possible.

But, not so fast. The DFR isn't a real DAC. I re-configured my setup so I could connect my DDC back and forth between my audio and non-audio PCs to test them back-to-back through my speaker system. Still...no easily identifiable difference. Okay, this is getting seriously bad.

Right now, my PPA OCXO USB is warming up. This will be the final test. If I can't find an improvement...guys, I spent a lot of money and time on the audio PC and I hope I did more than just achieve the performance from a gaming motherboard that costs a few hundred.

How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file.

I would get a sCLK - EX board from SOTM with 3 or 4 clocks activated to replace the clock on the motherboard, USB card and LAN control. Preferably I would sell the PPA and replace with SOTM's USB card, (for system synergy) and power this circuit seperately (USB card and sCLK - EX) with the best possible power supply.

I'd look into the issues of EMI/RFI interference and apply some 3M ( or similar ) absorbing sheet, and make sure my sata cables etc were shielded. Also a SATA filter and seperate supply to the hard discs/ SSD would benefit if not done already.

When buying a MB for audio purposes, I make sure to look for MBs with SPDIF pin outs. I then take a generic RCA coax SPDIF bracket, modify it with a true 75 ohm BNC connector. Connect the SPDIF pin outs on the MB to the DIY BNC bracket board. And then I have a true 75 ohm BNC connection to the computer for 24/192 output.

I too considered the PC audio approach, in fact I even silenced my converted shuttle with a silent PSU and giant cooler, but at the end of the day I found the exercise pointless. Although it is nice that it's quiet now, on the rare occasion I use it.

What I do is prepare and serve my music on a handy PC (usually a fairly ordinary dual core AMD linux server with a droning fan in the garage) and then play it on a Raspberry Pi 3B that sits next to my HiFi.

The Pi uses hardly any power, fits in a tiny tiny box, sucks the tracks over and plays them with full rates and bit depth via ALSA/aplay to whatever device is selected. Currentlu it's on the WiFi but I will plug it into the ethernet at some point to speed up track delivery for when I make late random track choices!

I then control this 'jukebox' from my laptop on the sofa, so it all works out rather well: cheap noisy PC in the garage, cheap silent linux slave on the HiFi and shiny laptop on the lap. I can still hear the fridge noise from the kitchen though, so it's not all roses.

... What I do is prepare and serve my music on a handy PC (usually a fairly ordinary dual core AMD linux server with a droning fan in the garage) and then play it on a Raspberry Pi 3B that sits next to my HiFi.

You can also run both a UPnP server (e.g., MinimServer) and a UPnP renderer (e.g., upmpdcli) on the same RPi3. If your music collection is stored on a USB drive attached to that RPi3, no data transfer over your LAN is needed at replay time and the RPi3 does not need to be wired to the LAN. You can control replay with any UPnP control point like for instance BubbleUPnP or Linn Kazoo. If your DAC needs a SPDIF input, you can put an Allo DigiOne or a HiFIBerry Digi+ Pro on the top of the RPi3. If your DAC needs a USB input, it is probably better to use an Allo Sparky + USBridge instead of the RPi3: the USB output of RPi devices is considered to be only mediocre. Many users have reported better results using devices like the microRendu, the ultraRendu, the sMS-200 and the sMS-200ultra instead of a RPi as network players. They offer the same (or less) functionalities than an RPi but are significantly more expensive. Thus, one would expect their USB outputs to be significantly better than the USB output of a RPi. 152ee80cbc

tridium niagara 4 software download

hp workwise download

download black box i don 39;t know anybody else