How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-09-26 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
• Voarmaks biggest strength: It is built specifically for JVC's Flats, HA-S150 and HA-S160 on-ear models, with protein leather over a foam cushion and a stretch-on fit that needs no tools.
• Voarmaks biggest trade-off: It is a thin, on-ear style pad with a small footprint, so it will not add the deep, plush over-ear feel that a bigger cushion provides.
• Hmoke biggest strength: High-density slow-rebound memory foam wrapped in soft protein leather, sized for the Jabra Elite 85H over-ear cups and described as extra-thick.
• Hmoke biggest trade-off: It only fits the Jabra Elite 85H, so if your headphones are a different model, this is not the pad for you.
• Who Voarmaks is for: Owners of JVC Flats, HA-S150 or HA-S160 on-ear headphones who want a snug, secure replacement that preserves the original sound.
• Who Hmoke is for: Owners of Jabra Elite 85H over-ear headphones who want a thicker, memory-foam cushion and a fresh look without buying new headphones.
The Voarmaks Flats Ear Pads are a purpose-built replacement for three specific JVC on-ear models: the Flats, the HA-S150 and the HA-S160. That narrow focus is the point. The pad is shaped to sit over the original frames, and the install method is as simple as stretching the cushion over the housing until it grips. No tools, no adhesive, no fiddling with clips. If your original JVC pads have gone flat, cracked or started flaking, this is the kind of drop-in fix that gets you listening again in a couple of minutes.
The materials are where the everyday comfort comes from. Voarmaks uses protein leather on the outside, which gives a soft, smooth surface against the ear, and a foam layer underneath for cushioning. On an on-ear headphone the pad is doing double duty: it is the comfort layer and the acoustic seal at the same time. Voarmaks states that the pads are engineered to maintain the original audio quality, delivering clear acoustics without distortion or muffling. That matters for on-ear designs, because a pad that is too thick or too dense can change how the driver couples to your ear and tilt the sound. Voarmaks is explicitly aiming for the original tuning, not a "modified" one.
In my opinion, this is the pick for someone who likes their JVC headphones as they are and just wants them comfortable and clean again. It is also a good fit if you wear on-ear headphones for commutes, podcasts or casual listening and prefer a lighter, lower-profile feel rather than a big over-ear cushion. The black faux-leather finish keeps the look close to stock, and the compact dimensions (roughly 2.36 x 2.36 x 0.71 inches) reflect that slim on-ear profile.
Who should skip it? Anyone with over-ear headphones, and specifically anyone with a Jabra Elite 85H — this pad is not made for that headphone. Also skip it if you are chasing a dramatically plusher, thicker cushion; the Voarmaks design is about matching the original on-ear shape, not bulking it up. And if your headphones are a JVC model outside the Flats, HA-S150 and HA-S160 family, confirm compatibility before you buy, because the fit here is model-specific.
The Hmoke Replacement Ear Pads are made for one headphone and one headphone only: the Jabra Elite 85H wireless over-ear model. Hmoke is direct about this — confirm your model before purchase. That is not a limitation so much as a promise: the pads are cut to match the Elite 85H cups, and Hmoke describes them as the same size and fit as the originals.
The headline feature is the foam. Hmoke uses high-density slow-rebound memory foam under premium soft protein leather. Slow-rebound memory foam is the type that compresses under pressure and then eases back into shape, which is why it tends to feel custom-molded to your ears over a few minutes of wear. Hmoke says the pads stay comfortable during long sessions with no swelling and no pain, and that they feel soft from the first time you put them on. That "no break-in period" claim is the practical difference between memory foam and cheaper open-cell foam, which often feels stiff for the first week.
The second thing Hmoke leans on is renewal. The pitch is simple: rather than replacing the whole headphone, you swap the pads and the headset looks and feels new again. For an over-ear wireless headphone, the ear pads are usually the first part to wear out — the leather flakes, the foam compresses, the seal weakens. Hmoke's answer is a quick, tool-free swap that the company says takes just a few minutes. The pads are black, matching the standard Elite 85H look, and the dimensions (about 2.76 x 0.98 x 3.74 inches) reflect the larger over-ear cup shape.
In my opinion, this is the right pick for someone who already owns the Jabra Elite 85H, likes the headphone, and wants to keep using it rather than shop for a replacement. The extra-thick cushioning is aimed at people who wear their headphones for hours — flights, long workdays, gaming sessions — and who notice when a pad goes flat. Hmoke also positions itself as a specialist in replacement ear pads and offers a one-year manufacturer warranty plus a stated 24-hour response window for questions, which is a reasonable safety net for a small accessory purchase.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for JVC Flats / HA-S150 / HA-S160 owners → Voarmaks Flats Ear Pads. It is the model-specific match.
• Best for Jabra Elite 85H owners → Hmoke Replacement Ear Pads. Also model-specific, and the only one of the two that fits an over-ear Jabra.
• Best for long-wear comfort → Hmoke Replacement Ear Pads. Slow-rebound memory foam is the more comfort-focused material choice.
• Best for preserving the original sound signature → Voarmaks Flats Ear Pads. Voarmaks states the pads are engineered to keep the original acoustics without muffling.
• Best for a quick, tool-free swap → Both. Voarmaks stretches over the frame; Hmoke says no special tools and a few minutes of work.
• Best for reviving an older headphone's look → Hmoke Replacement Ear Pads. The stated goal is a like-new appearance on your existing Elite 85H.
• Best for on-ear, low-profile feel → Voarmaks Flats Ear Pads. Slimmer pad, smaller footprint.
• Best for over-ear, plush feel → Hmoke Replacement Ear Pads. Thicker cup, larger dimensions.
If I owned a pair of JVC Flats, HA-S150 or HA-S160, I would buy the Voarmaks Flats Ear Pads, because the fit is designed around those exact models and Voarmaks is explicit about maintaining the original sound rather than altering it. If I owned the Jabra Elite 85H, I would buy the Hmoke Replacement Ear Pads, because the memory foam is the more comfort-oriented material and the whole point is to refresh a headphone I already like. Neither is a universal pad — they serve different headphones. Match the pad to your model, and either one does its job. Check the current price on Amazon before you commit, since these are small accessories where the numbers move around.
No. Voarmaks lists compatibility only with JVC Flats, HA-S150 and HA-S160 on-ear headphones. For the Jabra Elite 85H, the Hmoke Replacement Ear Pads are the matching option.
Hmoke states the pads are designed specifically for the Jabra Elite 85H. Confirm your headphone model before buying, since the fit is model-specific.
Based on the materials, the Hmoke pads lean toward comfort with high-density slow-rebound memory foam, which is designed to mold to your ears and stay soft during long wear. The Voarmaks pads use protein leather over foam and target a snug on-ear fit that preserves the original sound instead.
Yes, based on the product descriptions. Voarmaks says you simply stretch the pads over the original frames for a secure fit, and Hmoke says the swap needs no special tools and takes just a few minutes.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.
See also: MEDca Listening Set vs YUFFUN A8, Vonaural Active Noise Cancelling vs Arciea Bone Conduction Headphones, MAXROCK Mini Total Soft vs ZER-LON Earbuds: OWS Earbuds, YOUTHINK Universal 60mm vs MixPeak 24