Embedded Files
20250605 世界環境日-記者會/協調會(1)
記者會
Press Conference
記者會
Press Conference
民間團體訴求：(記者會)
終結各自為政，統一「食品碳足跡」計量單位：
點出環境部與農業部現有碳排放數據標準混亂（宣告單位包含包、盒、顆、公克等）的致命傷 。要求政府立即統一宣告單位（如每公斤、每人份），並公開對照表，讓民眾具備比對基礎。揭露真實排碳，全面導入「生命週期評估 (LCA)」：
拆穿《國家溫室氣體排放清冊》僅統計畜牧業直接排放（2%）的盲點。
要求以LCA 方式計算涵蓋進口、飼料、運輸的完整碳排，直指台灣消費動物性食品的真實碳排高達全國總量12%。從「超市」破局，啟動零售端碳標示試辦：
借鏡英國 Tesco、法國家樂福（Eco-Score）等國際成功經驗 。要求政府從最貼近民眾的零售連鎖通路（超市、超商）開始，強制展開食品碳足跡標示試辦計畫 。拒絕口號，政府須交出「全國標示時間表」：
要求今日與會的五大部會正面回應，針對「餐廳菜單」與「市售蔬果」的碳標示，提出具體落實的時間表與執行方案，邁向真正負責任的食物減排政策 。
Key Demands from NGOs: (press conference)
Standardize Carbon Footprint Units: Mandate the unification of disjointed carbon metrics across the Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Agriculture into standardized, comparable units [e.g., per kg or per serving].
Expose True Emissions via Life Cycle Assessment [LCA]: Expose the discrepancy in national inventories by mandating LCA calculations, revealing that animal-based food consumption actually accounts for 12% of Taiwan's total emissions, far exceeding the stated 2% direct agricultural emissions.
Launch Retail Carbon Labeling Pilots: Following international precedents like Tesco and Carrefour, require the government to initiate carbon labeling pilot programs starting at accessible retail endpoints like supermarkets and convenience stores.
Demand a Concrete National Timetable: Compel the five participating ministries to provide a clear, actionable timeline and execution plan for implementing carbon footprints on both restaurant menus and supermarket produce.
⚔️ 記者會攻防解密：從「各自為政」到「系統破局」
(Behind the Scenes: Breaking the Bureaucratic Silos)
⚔️ 記者會攻防解密：從「各自為政」到「系統破局」
(Behind the Scenes: Breaking the Bureaucratic Silos)
推動政策最難的不是提出願景，而是拆解行政體系的推託之詞。在 6/5 的閉門協調會中，我們成功利用跨部會的矛盾，逼出了一套更具可行性的國家級減碳解方。
1. 遭遇官僚之牆 會議初期，各部會展現了典型的穀倉效應（Silo Effect）：
環境部氣候署：主張已建立上百項碳足跡方法學，但堅持採取「企業自願申請」制，不願給出通用標準。
環境部環保司：將業務嚴格切割，表明只負責「惜食推廣」，拒絕承接飲食減碳與廚師培訓業務。
農業部：表示僅負責農產品「生產端」的碳排，加工與後端通路的碳排應由下游業者自行計算。
2. 意外的破口 僵局中，教育部國教署點出了現行機制的致命傷：
學校營養午餐使用的食材高達 3,000 多種，而環境部網站上僅有的 90 幾種「特定廠商」碳標籤，對學校中央廚房來說根本無法實務對接，導致校園飲食減碳無從算起。
3. 民間的致命一擊 我們立刻抓住這個實務痛點，反轉談判局勢。
我們直指環境部的「單一廠商認證制」行不通，並引述《Science (2018)》等國際權威期刊的作法，強力要求政府必須直接建立「通用食材的平均碳排係數」（例如：一般豬肉、一般高麗菜的平均碳排）。
唯有提供通用的基礎科學數據，教育部、公部門與大眾才能真正開始計算並落實飲食減碳，徹底排除了政策落地的技術障礙。
The hardest part of policy advocacy isn't pitching a vision; it's dismantling administrative evasion. During the closed-door coordination meeting on June 5th, we successfully leveraged inter-ministerial contradictions to force a more viable, national-level carbon reduction solution.
1. The Bureaucratic Wall Initially, the ministries displayed classic silo effects:
Climate Change Administration (Ministry of Environment): Claimed to have established hundreds of carbon footprint methodologies but insisted on a "voluntary corporate application" system, refusing to provide universal emission standards.
Department of Environmental Sanitation (Ministry of Environment): Strictly compartmentalized its duties, stating they only handle "food waste reduction" and explicitly refusing to take responsibility for dietary carbon reduction or chef training.
Ministry of Agriculture: Deflected by stating they only calculate emissions at the "production end," leaving downstream processing and retail emissions for operators to figure out themselves.
2. The Catalyst Amidst this deadlock, the K-12 Education Administration (Ministry of Education) exposed a fatal flaw in the current policy: school lunches utilize over 3,000 different ingredients. The Ministry of Environment's system—which only listed around 90 carbon labels tied to "specific corporate brands"—was practically useless for school central kitchens, making it impossible to calculate or implement carbon reductions in campus dining.
3. The NGO's Fatal Strike We immediately seized upon this practical bottleneck to turn the tables. We pointed out the unworkability of a "brand-specific certification system" and cited authoritative international journals like Science (2018) to demand a paradigm shift. We strongly urged the government to directly establish "Universal Category Coefficients" (e.g., the average carbon footprint for generic pork or generic cabbage). Only by providing baseline universal scientific data can the Ministry of Education, restaurants, and the general public truly begin to calculate and track dietary carbon reductions, completely removing the technical barriers to policy execution.
協調會(1)
Coordination Meeting (1)
協調會(1)
Coordination Meeting (1)
會前及會議當日，各相關部門均未提供書面報告資料，會議內容僅以口頭說明方式進行。
No written reports were submitted by the relevant ministries either prior to or on the day of the meeting;
all responses were delivered verbally during the session.
會前及會議當日，各相關部門均未提供書面報告資料，會議內容僅以口頭說明方式進行。
No written reports were submitted by the relevant ministries either prior to or on the day of the meeting;
all responses were delivered verbally during the session.
⚔️ 6/5 協調會攻防實錄：戳破官僚拖延戰術
(Behind the Scenes: Dismantling Bureaucratic Delay Tactics)
⚔️ 6/5 協調會攻防實錄：戳破官僚拖延戰術
(Behind the Scenes: Dismantling Bureaucratic Delay Tactics)
公聽會是逼迫官員畫押的舞台，而閉門協調會，則是防止他們把支票變成芭樂票的真實戰場。面對官僚體系慣用的技術性拖延、法規盾牌與互踢皮球，我們拒絕妥協，並在 6/5 的跨部會協調會中，成功達成四大政策破局：
1. 破解「法規與翻譯」的技術盾牌（官方 Vegan 標示案）
衛福部試圖以涉及 WTO 技術性法規通報及「中英文翻譯需與業者研議」為由，企圖延長法規上路的時間。我們拒絕讓政策無限期擱置，憑藉立委的政治施壓，當場鎖死「兩個月」的死線，要求衛福部必須交出具體進度。2. 竄改國家時鐘：要求「植物性轉型」提前三年
環境部官員企圖將「植物性蛋白取代肉類」邊緣化，聲稱這只是 2031 年後的中長期「構想」。我們直接砸出丹麥、荷蘭等國由農業部主導的國家級轉型實績，強勢主導會議走向，逼迫環境部承諾將轉型期程「提前三年（至 2027 年）」，並要求下次會議必須交出修正草案。3. 拆解「互踢皮球」的部門穀倉（植系廚師國家隊培訓案）
面對推動低碳植物性廚師培訓的要求，環境部與衛福部在會議上大打太極，互相推諉責任歸屬。我們不隨之起舞，直接從系統源頭下手，強烈要求將「低碳植物性飲食永續課程」強制寫入明年度的國家淨零行動計畫與預算中，徹底封死官僚卸責的空間。4. 終結「數據傲慢」，逼出全民秒懂的「直覺碳標示」
針對碳排係數，環境部仍執迷於複雜的「產業關聯推算」與高門檻的 ISO 查驗，甚至荒謬地要求消費者買便當時自己乘上重量來計算碳排。我們痛批這種「方法學傲慢」，強烈要求政府統一給出「通用平均係數」，最終逼出官員當場承諾：放棄複雜數字，未來將採用類似能源分級的「顏色區分」直覺設計，讓全民一眼秒懂產品碳排高低。
While public hearings are the stage for securing official mandates, closed-door coordination meetings are the real battlegrounds to ensure those mandates aren't reduced to empty promises. Faced with standard bureaucratic tactics—technical delays, regulatory shields, and responsibility deflections—we refused to compromise. In the June 5th cross-ministerial meeting, we secured four major policy breakthroughs:
1. Shattering the "Regulatory Translation" Shield (Official Vegan Labeling) The Ministry of Health and Welfare attempted to delay implementation by citing WTO technical regulations and the need to "further discuss translation nuances" with the industry. We refused to let the policy be indefinitely shelved. Leveraging legislative pressure, we imposed a hard two-month deadline, forcing the Ministry to deliver actionable progress.
2. Hacking the National Clock: Accelerating Protein Transition by 3 Years Ministry of Environment officials tried to sideline the "shifting to alternative proteins" mandate, framing it merely as a post-2031 "long-term concept." We weaponized national-level precedents from Denmark and the Netherlands, hijacking the narrative and forcing the Ministry to commit to accelerating the timeline by three years (to 2027), demanding a revised draft by the next meeting.
3. Dismantling the Silo Effect (Plant-Based Chef Training) When pressed on implementing low-carbon culinary training, the Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of Health and Welfare played ping-pong with their responsibilities. Bypassing their excuses, we struck at the systemic level, demanding that "Sustainable Low-Carbon Plant-Based Training" be hardwired into next year's National Net-Zero Action Plan and budget, eliminating any room for evasion.
4. Ending "Data Arrogance" for Intuitive Carbon Labeling The Ministry of Environment clung to convoluted, top-down industry metrics and ISO standards, absurdly expecting consumers to calculate their own carbon math when buying a meal. We aggressively attacked this unworkable complexity, demanding practical "Universal Category Coefficients." Ultimately, we extracted a live commitment from officials: to abandon confusing numbers in favor of an intuitive, color-coded carbon labeling system (similar to energy-efficiency ratings) that any consumer can instantly understand.
📜 6/5 協調會官方公文結論：鎖死死線與四大強化指令
Official Conclusions of the June 5th Coordination Meeting:
Locking in Deadlines & Four Reinforced Directives
📜 6/5 協調會官方公文結論：鎖死死線與四大強化指令
Official Conclusions of the June 5th Coordination Meeting:
Locking in Deadlines & Four Reinforced Directives
立委辦公室於 6 月 10 日正式發函，嚴正宣示兩個月後的會議將同步追溯「4/22 公聽會（十大戰略）」與「6/5 協調會」的所有進度。過去的承諾並未歸零，而是合併成為對五大部會的雙重考核基準。
本次公文更是針對前次共識，進一步防堵官僚的技術性推諉，強勢下達四大強化追蹤指令：
1. 統一碳排計算標準（強化「菜單碳標示」進度）：
針對環境部缺乏通用數據的漏洞，要求氣候變遷署整合各主管機關，正式公告統一的「食材碳排計算方法學及係數」，徹底排除各部會以「標準不一」作為拖延的藉口。2. 政策期程提早三年（強化「重寫國家時間表」承諾）：
針對原訂於 2030 年後才啟動的「植物性蛋白替代肉類蛋白計畫」，要求各部會明確納入行政院關鍵戰略行動計畫。同時將啟動時間提前三年至 2027 年，並責成環境部提出具體施行範例，不容許政策空轉。3. 提交具體量化行動計畫（防堵「紙上談兵」與列管敷衍）：
嚴禁各部會的低碳蔬食行動僅停留在「構想或列管階段」，要求下次會議必須針對前次各項結論，提出具備「明確執行細節、責任單位及量化目標」的具體落實方案。4. 追蹤 Vegan 標示與校園豆奶進度（鎖定衛福部與教育部 KPI）： 不容許行政程序無限期拖延，要求衛福部針對「Vegan 納入標示規定」提出明確完成期程與執行成果報告；並要求同步回報「校園以豆奶代替牛奶」的實質評估情況與後續動作。
On June 10th, the Legislator's office issued an official dispatch explicitly declaring that the follow-up meeting in two months will simultaneously review the progress of both the April 22nd Public Hearing (the Top 10 Policy Mandates) and the June 5th Coordination Meeting. Past commitments are not reset; they are merged to form a rigorous, dual-evaluation baseline. This dispatch specifically plugs the loopholes of bureaucratic evasion by enforcing four tightened directives based on previous agreements:
1. Standardize Carbon Metrics (Reinforcing "Carbon Labeling"): Targeting the lack of universal data, this directive forces the Climate Change Administration to coordinate with all authorities to officially publish a unified "Carbon Emission Calculation Methodology and Coefficients," eliminating any excuses regarding inconsistent technical standards.
2. Accelerate the Policy Timeline by 3 Years (Reinforcing "Rewriting the National Timeline"): To prevent policy stalling, ministries are now required to explicitly incorporate the "Plant-Based Protein Substitution Plan" into the Executive Yuan's Key Strategic Action Plans. The launch is forcefully advanced by three years to 2027, with the Ministry of Environment tasked to provide concrete implementation frameworks.
3. Deliver Quantifiable Action Plans (Preventing Conceptual Evasion): Strictly prohibiting ministries from keeping actions at the "conceptual or monitoring stages," this mandate demands that all previously agreed-upon low-carbon dietary actions be translated into concrete plans with "clear execution details, designated responsible units, and quantifiable goals" by the next meeting.
4. Track "Vegan" Labeling & Soy Milk Initiatives (Locking in MoHW and MoE KPIs): Refusing to allow indefinite administrative delays, the Ministry of Health and Welfare is mandated to submit a concrete progress report detailing the exact timeline for incorporating the "Vegan" category into national regulations, while simultaneously reporting on the substantive evaluation of "replacing cow's milk with soy milk" in schools.
20250610_昭姿委員_食品碳足跡標示制度化協調會會議結論.pdf20250610_昭姿委員_食品碳足跡標示制度化協調會會議結論_translated_Gemini.pdf📜 兩周後各部門補充之書面資料
Updated written materials after 2 weeks
📜 兩周後各部門補充之書面資料
Updated written materials after 2 weeks
Google Sites
Report abuse