No Memory Means No Imagination

This piece, by Onno Berkan, was published on 01/21/25. The original text, by Hassabis et al., was published by PNAS on 01/30/07.

In this UCL Study, researchers compared five patients with damaged hippocampi to a group of healthy individuals. The researchers wanted to see if the hippocampus, which is heavily involved in memory, plays a role in imagination. The participants were asked to imagine and describe new scenarios in response to simple verbal cues, like imagining being on a tropical beach, while being specifically instructed not to describe real memories.

The results were striking: Most patients with hippocampal damage had difficulty creating rich, detailed, imagined experiences. Their descriptions were notably fragmented and lacked spatial coherence compared to the vivid and well-structured imaginings of the healthy participants. Importantly, this wasn't because the task was more difficult for the patients—both groups rated the difficulty level similarly. The researchers also ensured participants weren't just recalling real memories by having them rate how similar their imagined scenarios were to actual memories.

Interestingly, one patient (lovingly called P01) performed normally on the task, which the researchers attributed to having enough remaining functional hippocampal tissue. This exception helped confirm that the ability to imagine new experiences wasn't solely dependent on having intact memory abilities. The study revealed that the hippocampus is crucial in providing the spatial context or "mental stage" where memories and imagined experiences can be constructed.

These findings challenge traditional views about how the brain processes and creates experiences. Previously, scientists thought that imagining new experiences could be done using general knowledge stored in other brain parts without needing the hippocampus. However, this study showed that the hippocampus is vital for remembering the past and constructing new imagined scenarios. This suggests that remembering past events and imagining new experiences are more closely connected than previously thought, sharing similar brain mechanisms and structures.

This brings to mind the reconstructive theory of memory, which suggests that our long-term memories are not stored whole but reconstructed every time we access them. This process uses a lot of context, which doesn’t necessarily come from the original memory but is filled in by the brain. 

This research has broader implications for understanding how the brain creates mental experiences, whether memories or imagined scenarios. It provides valuable insights into how our brains construct real and imagined experiences, showing that no memories mean no imagination and no past means no future.

Want to submit a piece? Or trying to write a piece and struggling? Check out the guides here!

Thank you for reading. Reminder: Byte Sized is open to everyone! Feel free to submit your piece. Please read the guides first though.

All submissions to berkan@usc.edu with the header “Byte Sized Submission” in Word Doc format please. Thank you!