A Symbiotic Nexus: How AI and Neuroscience Propel Each Other Forward

This piece, by Santie McKenzie, was published on 12/03/24. The original text, by Ford et al., was published by the National Academies Press in 2024.

The Brain as an Architect for AI

Neuroscience has profoundly shaped AI development. Foundational work on artificial neural networks (ANNs), such as Rosenblatt’s perceptron in the 1950s, was directly inspired by the behavior of neurons and synaptic connections. More recently, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which revolutionized image recognition, are modeled on the primate visual system's hierarchical architecture. These AI models mimic how visual information is processed, from simpler features (edges and shapes) in early brain regions to complex patterns (faces and objects) in higher-order areas. For example, studies by Jim DiCarlo's lab at MIT demonstrate that CNNs aligned with the ventral visual processing stream can predict neural responses in monkeys better than previous neuroscience models.

Similarly, reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms mirror the brain’s reward-processing systems, particularly the dopaminergic pathways in the basal ganglia. The workshop highlighted how computational models of RL, grounded in neuroscience, have elucidated the neural underpinnings of decision-making and adaptive behavior. These algorithms now power autonomous systems like AlphaGo, which defeated human champions using brain-inspired strategies for learning and optimization.

However, as AI diverges from biological constraints, its independence has fostered innovation. Generative Pretrained Transformers (GPT), like ChatGPT, demonstrate intelligence in language processing without adhering to brain-like architectures. Workshop participants argued that while GPT-4 lacks neural plausibility, its modular organization resembles how the brain compartmentalizes functions, offering a new lens to explore cognitive processes.

AI as a Microscope for Neural Insights

Conversely, AI has become an indispensable tool in neuroscience. Machine learning techniques now drive breakthroughs in analyzing complex neural datasets, uncovering hidden patterns, and modeling brain dynamics. The workshop featured striking examples:

• Modeling Vision with AI: DiCarlo’s team used AI-driven methods to map connections in the monkey's visual cortex, achieving unprecedented accuracy in predicting neural activity during object recognition tasks. These models simulate brain functions and uncover previously unseen subtleties in visual processing.
  
  

• Speech Processing and Auditory Neuroscience: Edward Chang’s research at UCSF revealed parallels between artificial neural networks and the human auditory system. His team’s models, trained on hierarchical representations of sound, mimicked how the brain processes linguistic information, such as phonemes and intonations. This work is informing assistive technologies for speech disorders.
  
  

• Digital Twins for Precision Medicine: Viktor Jirsa’s project on “digital twins” constructs patient-specific brain models by integrating multiscale data, from genetic markers to intracranial recordings. These simulations are already being applied in epilepsy research to predict seizure zones more accurately than current diagnostic methods, paving the way for non-invasive treatment strategies.
  
  

The workshop's key focus was the synthesis of multiscale data spanning molecular, cellular, and behavioral levels. Participants emphasized how integrating such data with AI models could accelerate our understanding of neurodegenerative conditions like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease.

Neurotechnology and Ethical Frontiers

The application of AI in neuroscience is not without challenges. The workshop underscored the ethical dilemmas surrounding using AI in clinical and research contexts. For instance, predictive algorithms in mental health may inadvertently perpetuate biases if training data are unrepresentative. AI-driven diagnostic tools must navigate a fine line between personalization and generalization to avoid exacerbating health inequities.

One notable case involved Chang’s speech models, which exhibited performance differences across languages and dialects. While these models can adapt to individual speaker variability, their training in predominantly Western languages underscores the importance of diverse datasets.

Participants also debated the implications of AI autonomy in clinical decision-making. Jana Schaich Borg’s work on moral artificial intelligence demonstrated how interpretable AI could assist in ethical dilemmas, such as triaging scarce medical resources. Her team’s “moral GPS” aggregates population-level moral judgments into a tool for navigating complex choices. While promising, such systems raise questions about accountability and the boundaries of machine ethics.

Bridging Gaps with Collaborative Infrastructure

Interdisciplinary collaboration is essential to harness AI’s potential in neuroscience. Initiatives like the European EBRAINS infrastructure and the U.S. BRAIN Initiative are pioneering efforts to integrate neuroscience data and computational resources. For example, EBRAINS' digital twin framework links multimodal datasets to simulate individual brain functions, offering clinicians a powerful tool for tailoring interventions.

However, challenges remain. High-quality data collection and open sharing are prerequisites for progress, yet ethical, technical, and logistical barriers often impede access. Workshop participants called for standardized protocols and investments in shared digital infrastructure to democratize AI-neuroscience research globally.

The Future of AI and Neuroscience

Looking ahead, the workshop highlighted key opportunities at the intersection of AI and neuroscience:

1. Enhanced Multiscale Modeling: From single neurons to whole-brain networks, multiscale AI models could bridge gaps between micro-level dynamics and macro-level behaviors, unlocking new therapies for brain disorders.
   
   

2. Understanding Cognitive Efficiency: The brain learns and adapts more remarkably than current AI systems. Insights into how humans generalize from limited data could inspire more efficient machine learning algorithms.
   
   

3. Interdisciplinary Education: Fostering expertise that spans AI engineering and cognitive neuroscience will be crucial. Institutions must support cross-disciplinary training and collaborative research to cultivate the next generation of innovators.
   
   

4. Regulation and Public Trust: Transparent, interpretable AI systems are vital for fostering trust. Policymakers must balance innovation with oversight, ensuring ethical use without stifling progress.
   
   

As Frances Jensen aptly summarized during the workshop’s closing session, “The frontier of neuroscience is the frontier of artificial intelligence.” By leveraging the symbiosis between these fields, researchers aim not only to build smarter machines but also to deepen our understanding of the brain—an endeavor that may ultimately redefine the nature of intelligence itself.

For readers interested in deep-diving into this article themselves, please let us know what you think!

Want to submit a piece? Or trying to write a piece and struggling? Check out the guides here!

Thank you for reading. Reminder: Byte Sized is open to everyone! Feel free to submit your piece. Please read the guides first though.

All submissions to berkan@usc.edu with the header “Byte Sized Submission” in Word Doc format please. Thank you!