How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
If you want a dedicated pair of closed back studio headphones built for long monitoring sessions, choose Turnstile Audio TAPH700; if you need a recording microphone and a pair of closed back headphones in one box, choose Mackie EM-91C. That's the whole decision in one sentence, and everything below is just the reasoning behind it.
• Turnstile Audio TAPH700 — biggest strength: a purpose-built closed back headphone with 50mm drivers, memory foam leather earpads, and a 32 Ohm impedance that runs straight off a laptop or phone. Biggest trade-off: it's headphones only — you get no microphone, so you still need a separate mic for tracking.
• Mackie EM-91C — biggest strength: it's a two-piece recording kit, pairing a large-diaphragm cardioid condenser mic with closed back MC-100 monitoring headphones. Biggest trade-off: you don't get deep headphone specs — no impedance, frequency range, or driver size is listed — and the mic needs an XLR interface, so it isn't plug-and-play.
• Who the TAPH700 is for: the listener, editor, or mixer who lives in one pair of headphones all day.
• Who the EM-91C is for: the podcaster, singer-songwriter, or content creator starting a recording setup from zero.
The TAPH700 is the more specialized tool of the two. Everything in its spec list points at one job: accurate, isolated listening. The 50mm drivers are the largest single component in the design, and they're the reason this headphone is aimed at critical monitoring rather than casual background music. The claimed frequency range of 8Hz to 36kHz is wide at both ends — deep enough for bass-heavy material, high enough to catch air and detail in the top end.
The closed back earcup design is the headline for me. Closed back means the cups seal around your ears and physically block outside sound, which is exactly what you want when you're tracking a vocalist in the same room as a live mic, editing on a noisy laptop fan, or trying to hear a subtle click track over a drum kit. Open back headphones leak sound both ways; these don't. If you've ever had a take ruined because the mic picked up bleed from the headphones, that's the problem this design solves.
Comfort and compatibility matter just as much over a long day. The leather memory foam earpads conform to your ears rather than pressing flat against them, and the adjustable headband is built to hold a secure fit across head sizes. The 32 Ohm impedance is the practical detail I'd flag most: it's low enough that a laptop, tablet, or phone drives these without a separate headphone amp, so you can mix on the couch, not just at the desk. Power handling up to 1500mW means you can push volume without the drivers falling apart.
You also get a coiled cable, a 1/8" to 1/4" adapter, and a soft carrying case — a genuinely complete kit for someone moving between a home setup and a studio. Skip the TAPH700 if you need a microphone as part of the purchase, or if you want an open, airy soundstage for mixing rather than isolation.
The EM-91C is a bundle, and that's the entire point. It pairs a large-diaphragm condenser microphone with the MC-100 closed back headphones, so one purchase covers both halves of a basic recording chain — the thing you sing into and the thing you listen through.
The microphone half is a cardioid large-diaphragm condenser. Cardioid means it's directional: it favors what's in front of it and rejects more of what's behind, which is why it's the standard choice for solo vocals, acoustic guitar, and spoken-word recording. "Large diaphragm" is the part that matters for tone — it's the design associated with the warm, detailed character people want on a lead vocal. The metal enclosure and black finish suggest a mic built to survive a desk, a bag, and regular handling rather than a fragile studio-only piece.
The headphone half is the MC-100, a closed back model with conforming ear pads and a padded headband. Closed back here does the same job as on the TAPH700: it keeps your monitoring isolated so it doesn't bleed into the mic. Mackie describes custom drivers tuned for clear, balanced sound and markets the pair under its studio-sound banner. I'd treat that as a fair description of intent rather than a spec — there's no impedance, frequency response, or driver size listed, so I can't tell you how the MC-100 compares to the TAPH700 on paper. What I can tell you is that the pads and headband are explicitly designed for long sessions.
One real limitation to plan around: the mic is XLR and corded, so it needs an audio interface or mixer with phantom power. It will not plug into a laptop's headphone jack. Skip the EM-91C if you already own a mic and just want better headphones, or if you want plug-and-play simplicity.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for a complete first recording setup → Mackie EM-91C. Mic and headphones together cover both ends of the chain in one purchase.
• Best for plug-and-play with a laptop or phone → Turnstile Audio TAPH700. At 32 Ohms it runs without extra amplification; the EM-91C's mic needs an XLR interface with phantom power.
• Best for capturing vocals and instruments → Mackie EM-91C. The large-diaphragm cardioid condenser is designed for exactly that; the TAPH700 records nothing.
• Best for high-volume, distortion-free monitoring → Turnstile Audio TAPH700. The 1500mW power handling is the number that backs this up.
• Best for a travel-ready headphone kit → Turnstile Audio TAPH700. Coiled cable, 3.5mm-to-6.3mm adapter, and soft carrying case are all included.
• Best for a two-device bundle value → Mackie EM-91C. You're buying two pieces of gear; check the current price on Amazon to see how that lands against buying each separately.
• Best if you already own a microphone → Turnstile Audio TAPH700. No point paying for a mic you won't use.
If I had to pick one, I'd buy the Turnstile Audio TAPH700. My reason is simple: it's the more fully specified product for the job in the title. A 50mm driver, 32 Ohm impedance, 8Hz–36kHz range, 1500mW handling, memory foam leather pads, and a full accessory kit tell me exactly what I'm getting as a closed back studio headphone. The Mackie bundle is genuinely smart for someone starting from nothing, and its mic is the piece the TAPH700 simply doesn't have. But if monitoring is your priority, the TAPH700 is the one I'd reach for.
FAQ
what are closed back studio headphones
what is open back studio headphones
Open back headphones have vented earcups, so air moves freely and sound leaks in and out. The upside is usually a wider, more spacious sound; the downside is almost no isolation and bleed into any nearby microphone. Neither the TAPH700 nor the Mackie bundle is open back — both are sealed, isolated designs.
what are the best closed back studio headphones
"Best" depends on what you're plugging into and whether you also need a mic. The TAPH700 is the stronger pure headphone pick here, with 50mm drivers, 32 Ohm impedance for laptop and phone use, and a 1500mW power rating. The Mackie EM-91C makes sense when you want closed back monitoring plus a recording mic in one purchase.
No. Its microphone is XLR and corded, so it needs an interface or mixer with phantom power to operate. The MC-100 headphones in the bundle are the plug-and-play part; the mic is not.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.
See also: Xmenha Tiny Hidden vs BLXSounds A9, Joso USB Unilateral Headset vs TruVoice VoicePro 20, Master & Dynamic MW65 vs Luxury & Precision W4, ausounds Headphones vs KIDSBAND Headphones