If you want cushioned over-ear headphones with long playback for gym sessions, choose TPVision/ Philips H5205; if you need a low-profile, non-in-ear design for sleep and light workouts, choose MZQYRVK Non in-Ear Sleep. For most gym use, I’d pick the H5205 because its over-ear fit, adjustable ear cups, and wired option make its intended use clearer. The MZQYRVK is the more specialized pick when a bulky headset is exactly what you want to avoid.
TPVision/ Philips H5205 vs MZQYRVK Non in-Ear Sleep at a Glance
• TPVision/ Philips H5205: Cushioned over-ear design, 40 mm drivers, and a bass boost button; the trade-off is its larger over-ear form.
• MZQYRVK Non in-Ear Sleep: Ultra-thin, hollow ear design intended for side sleeping, with claimed hybrid noise cancellation; the trade-off is that its sleep-focused fit is less conventional for gym use.
• H5205 battery: Up to 29 hours of playback, plus a detachable 3.5 mm cable for listening without relying on battery power.
• MZQYRVK battery: The product listing claims up to 80 hours total playback with its charging case; individual earbud runtime is not specified.
• Choose the H5205 if you want an over-ear headphone for workouts, music, and calls. Choose the MZQYRVK if sleep comfort and a less protruding ear design are your priorities.
The H5205 is an over-ear Bluetooth headphone with 40 mm dynamic drivers and a button that boosts bass. Its cushioned headband and adjustable ear cups give it a familiar, full-size headphone design. For gym sessions, that makes it a sensible choice if you prefer an over-ear fit and want direct access to stronger bass without adjusting a phone or music player.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-21 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
I’d choose the H5205 for someone who wants one headphone for workouts, everyday listening, and calls through its built-in microphone. I’d skip it if you specifically need a compact sleep earbud, a non-in-ear profile, or documented water resistance. It folds in two directions for storage, but it remains an over-ear headphone rather than a small sleep-oriented design.
The MZQYRVK is designed around sleep: its open, hollow ear structure and thin curved shell are intended to sit close to the ear rather than protrude like a conventional earbud. That design is aimed especially at side sleepers who dislike a bulky shape pressing against a pillow. Its listing also claims up to 42 dB of hybrid active noise cancellation and describes use for sounds such as snoring, traffic, and cabin noise. Those are product claims, not a guarantee that every sound will be blocked.
For audio, the product is described as suitable for music, white noise, podcasts, and audiobooks. Bluetooth 5.3 is claimed in the key features, along with a charging case that brings total playback to a stated 80 hours and displays the case and earbud power. The product information separately lists Bluetooth 4.1, so the Bluetooth version is inconsistent across the supplied details; I would not make the connection version a deciding advantage without clarification.
The MZQYRVK may also suit office listening, travel, and casual workouts, according to its listed use cases. But it is not the obvious choice for a vigorous gym routine: the fit is described for mild sports, and there is no stated IP water-resistance rating. If you want a standard over-ear gym headphone or a clearly documented waterproof option, this is not the one I’d choose based on the available specifications.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for an over-ear gym fit → TPVision/ Philips H5205. Its cushioned headband and adjustable ear cups are a more familiar choice for someone who prefers headphones over earbuds.
• Best for a bass adjustment at the headphone → TPVision/ Philips H5205. A dedicated bass boost button gives you a physical way to emphasize low-end sound.
• Best for a claimed long total playback figure → MZQYRVK Non in-Ear Sleep. Its listing gives up to 80 hours with the case, while the H5205 is listed for up to 29 hours. These figures describe different setups, and the MZQYRVK’s individual-earbud runtime is not provided.
• Best for wired listening → TPVision/ Philips H5205. It includes a detachable 3.5 mm cable, while no wired listening option is listed for the MZQYRVK.
• Best for a low-profile design around a pillow → MZQYRVK Non in-Ear Sleep. Its hollow, non-blocking structure is made for sleep-oriented use rather than the H5205’s over-ear coverage.
• Best choice if you need documented waterproofing → Neither, based on the listed details. The H5205 has no stated water-resistance rating, and the MZQYRVK is described as moisture resistant rather than carrying an IPX7 rating. Neither can honestly be called an IPX7 waterproof Bluetooth headphone for gym use.
• Best open ear headphones for gym? The MZQYRVK’s hollow design may appeal if you want a less conventional ear fit, but it is presented primarily as a sleep headphone and only for casual or mild sports. For a gym-focused over-ear option, I’d lean toward the H5205.
For the gym, I would buy the TPVision/ Philips H5205. Its over-ear design, bass boost, adjustable cups, and detachable cable make it the clearer match for someone who wants a versatile headphone for workouts and daily listening. It is not specified as water-resistant, so I would not choose it on the assumption that it can handle sweat or rain. I’d pick the MZQYRVK instead if side-sleep comfort and a slim profile matter more than a conventional gym fit.
FAQ
Neither product’s supplied details state an IPX7 rating. The MZQYRVK is listed as moisture resistant, but that is not the same as an IPX7 specification; the H5205 has no water-resistance rating listed.
The H5205 is listed for up to 29 hours per charge. The MZQYRVK claims up to 80 hours of total playback with its charging case, but its individual-earbud runtime is not specified.
The MZQYRVK is the more sleep-focused option. Its thin, hollow design is intended to sit close to the ear and reduce pressure from a pillow; the H5205’s over-ear cups and headband are not described as a sleep design.
• Razer Kraken Gaming Headset vs USOTSO MPOWER: Gaming Over
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.