Regarding the many "satanic" and Abrahamic cults, which are often more or less adaptations or defamations of the cults surrounding Ishtar, the following should be noted:
Many scriptures of such cults, like those of the Church of Satan for instance, process 80% truths mixed with 20% lies or omissions. The reason is straightforward: the 20% of lies or concealed information serves as the control mechanism, while the 80% of truth is merely there to make the entire construct appear credible. Similar to patterns seen in politics, Zipf's Law, and the Pareto principle (the 80/20 rule), it is this crucial 20% that dictates the direction and essentially upholds the entire framework. The followers of Abraham have allegedly employed this principle for millennia. Through this method, many prophets were simply renamed or their gender altered, stories and events originally attributed to the Goddess were ascribed to other gods, prophets, or angels, and much more.
Therefore, read the scriptures of these perceived adversaries: Bibles in any version, the Quran, the Talmud, Kabbalah, the Satanic Bible, Liber AL vel Legis, and all similar texts. Too often, you will find a distortion of facts, slight alterations of names, or even contexts twisted to favor the Abrahamic followers and worshipers of יהוה (YHWH/JAHWEH) – characterized here as the god of wrath, destruction, and the oppression of humanity.
Even "established" historical accounts these days must, willingly or unwillingly, expose many falsehoods or concede to their unmasking, as illustrated in the following example:
Based on misinterpretations of the Tanakh and driven by religious interests, a false image of the Babylonian Exile is often painted, even today. For instance, Psalm 137 is sometimes used to depict the "population as captives forced into slave labor, who, at the end of the day, sit by the rivers of Babylon weeping and thinking of Zion." It is likely that the exile was perceived as a religious punishment; however, externally, the Jews in Babylon experienced comfortable living conditions. Like other Jewish communities settled in various colonies, they could engage in trade, agriculture, and house building without coercion. Even slave ownership was permitted. The exiles managed their own administration. There is no evidence of forced labor specifically imposed on the Jews. It is only known that the general Babylonian population was, in certain cases, compelled into short-term corvée labor, such as for royal construction projects. During the Babylonian Exile, the Jews were able to preserve their traditions and religious identity. The Jews settled in and around Babylon assimilated quite rapidly. Thus, Jewish names found in written records show that Jews could pursue careers in Nebuchadnezzar II's court and military. There are also reports of Jewish banking dynasties. According to the biblical narrative in the Book of Daniel (part of the Tanakh), Daniel, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego were among the chosen exiles who received training for Babylonian civil service. This rapid assimilation and the associated temptation to adopt a foreign religion likely contributed to the rather bleak picture of the Babylonian Exile painted in the Tanakh. To prevent Jewish identity from being completely absorbed into Babylon's diverse melting pot of peoples, Jewish theologians and scholars emphasized the uniqueness of Judaism, especially the Jewish faith. The Torah and religious scholarship became central to life. Consequently, the Babylonian Exile is considered one of the most fertile periods for Jewish theology. Given the absence of the home temple for communal prayer, the first synagogues probably emerged during this time. According to historical-critical biblical scholarship, the final version of the Pentateuch, the Priestly source, also originated during this period, in which, among other things, the regulations for circumcision (Gen 17:10–14 EU) were added. (Source: Wikipedia)
And this is merely a fraction of the truth. Based on this example and its factual presentation, one quickly notices how a 20% alteration or misinterpretation can drastically distort the perception of events, aligning with the 80/20 principle discussed earlier.