October 28, 2024
The Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF), the Philippines’ first sovereign wealth fund, was established with ambitious goals, aiming to stimulate economic growth, create jobs, and drive high-impact infrastructure projects across sectors like energy, agriculture, and tourism. Named after the historic term “Maharlika,” which represents nobility and dignity, the fund is projected to be a significant player in the financial landscape of the Philippines. With a capital pool of PHP 500 billion (around USD 9 billion) that was sourced from contributions by the Development Bank of the Philippines, Land Bank of the Philippines, and central bank dividends, transparency issues present a challenge.
One of the MIF’s primary investment avenues lies in infrastructure, an area of critical need in the Philippines. By focusing on infrastructure, the MIF could accelerate projects, such as transportation and energy systems, crucial for reducing the cost of doing business, enhancing productivity, and boosting employment. The government anticipates that channeling MIF resources into infrastructure could complement its Medium-Term Fiscal Framework, expanding the fiscal space and potentially decreasing the need for foreign loans for big projects. By targeting both profitable and strategic sectors like digitalization, healthcare, and renewable energy, the fund also aligns with global trends in sustainable and inclusive economic growth.
Photo from Rappler
While the MIF has garnered interest, it also faces significant challenges, particularly in securing foreign investments. Observers note that the Philippines competes with stronger investment climates in Southeast Asia, such as Vietnam and Thailand, which might deter immediate foreign interest. The Marcos administration has actively promoted the MIF internationally, including at the World Economic Forum, to attract investors. This foreign investment is crucial, as domestic funds alone may not suffice to fuel the fund's ambitious projects, particularly amid public skepticism about the fund's governance and transparency.
The MIF’s potential impact extends beyond economic growth to issues of public trust and governance. Concerns around oversight and transparency are particularly pointed, given past controversies surrounding Philippine government projects. Strict regulations are in place for the MIF, including oversight from the Commission on Audit and a dedicated Risk Management Committee, to address these concerns. These safeguards aim to protect the fund from mismanagement, ensuring funds are allocated effectively and in alignment with the Philippines’ economic goals.
Critics argue that the MIF could also exacerbate fiscal strain. Financing the fund through government assets, taxes, and government-controlled corporations like the Land Bank and Development Bank of the Philippines could create risks of crowding out private investment. Increasing government involvement in capital markets might dampen private sector participation, potentially leading to less competitive investment opportunities and higher borrowing costs for businesses. Moreover, there is a risk that overreliance on domestic sources could increase the national debt, affecting the country’s fiscal stability.
Photo from Rappler
While the fund aims to lower reliance on foreign assistance for infrastructure financing, it also demands an environment conducive to private investment. If private sector confidence weakens, the MIF could face a shortage of private investment partners, limiting its scope and impact. Therefore, fostering a stable investment climate and clarifying governance processes are essential to attract both foreign and private sector investments.
One of the more significant socio-political implications of the MIF is the potential shift it represents in public trust in governance. In a political climate marked by calls for transparency, the MIF will likely be closely watched by both domestic civil society and international observers. Its success or failure could influence public perception of the Marcos administration’s commitment to ethical governance. The MIF also serves as a litmus test for the administration’s ability to address long-standing transparency issues, as demands for more rigorous checks and balances grow louder.
The success of the MIF will depend largely on its ability to build trust, attract sustainable investments, and navigate the complex landscape of Philippine politics. By aligning with sustainable development goals, attracting private and foreign investments, and adhering to stringent transparency measures, the MIF has the potential to become a robust catalyst for economic growth. However, without sufficient safeguards and investor confidence, it risks becoming a financial burden and eroding public trust.
As the MIF takes shape, its broader implications for governance, public trust, and economic sustainability will likely become evident, making it both a significant opportunity and a formidable challenge for the Philippines. Its success could signal a new chapter in the Philippines' economic development, while its pitfalls might serve as lessons for future policy initiatives in the region.
Sources:
https://th.boell.org/en/2023/08/09/maharlika-investment-fund
https://businessmirror.com.ph/2024/02/20/maharlika-funds-priority-is-in-energy-q4-timeline-eyed/
https://www.csis.org/analysis/unpacking-philippines-new-sovereign-wealth-fund
https://business.inquirer.net/421813/the-maharlika-investment-fund-and-its-promise
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373108055_Maharlika_Investment_Fund_Still_Beyond_Repair
About the Writer: Reyn Ann Elorde is a 2nd-year double major student in Business Economics and Marketing Management at the University of St. La Salle-Bacolod. She enjoys crafting feature pieces in her free time and is currently exploring the world of editorial writing.