New Orleans Museum of Art, or NOMA, is about 15 minutes from downtown New Orleans and very accessible by car, street car, or bicycle. We went on a Saturday around 10 a.m. and had zero trouble getting in (we Ubered). Parking may be an issue during the weekend, as the museum is in the middle of an active park.
The museum was $20 and worth the price. We looked for two paintings in particular, "Whisperings of Love" by William Bouguereau and "Portrait of Mrs. Asher B. Wertheimer" by John Singer Sargent. Both Paintings are on the second floor and placed next to each other so, of course, this is where we spent most of our time.
We learn a lot by studying these paintings in person. Bouguereau's layering process is clear when standing just inches away. His underdrawing is still visible in areas, especially outlines in the cloth. The paint gets thicker as it gets lighter to the point that a few white areas look as if they want to fall off the canvas. The purple mountains in the background give the painting an amazing atmosphere that no picture can recreate.
Sargent's painting is a great example of subtle color changes and "icky" colors. There is a ''purpley" cold color on the left (our left) check just above the jaw and greens under the lips that aren't visible in the picture I took or in the art books with his work. These colors are meant to be there and they help the healthy areas come forward. I'm not going to get carried away with each painting, that is for another time. This is meant to be a museum review.
NOMA offers a variety of artwork and antiquities on display so most museum-goers will find something to enjoy. Jewelry, furniture, artifacts dating back to 4000-2000 BCE, modern art, local art, and a garden full of statues.
The NOMA statue garden is free and a wonderful walk. I will have to say I'm not a fan of modern art so the north side of the statue garden was not very interesting to me but I could see a lot of people enjoying the area.
The little things... The staff was kind, the restrooms were clean, NOMA has a cafeteria full of goodies, and the AC worked great. Overall NOMA was a fun experience with a few pleasant surprises.
I would recommend anyone driving distance to visit but that's about it. There are a few museums worth traveling to and this isn't one of them. The city of New Orleans has too much to offer for the museum to compete with.
In my portrait drawing and painting classes, we mostly work on a master study (replicating a painting from a master painter) from a photograph. Within the first few minutes of the class demonstration, I mentioned that we should "take the photograph with a grain of salt." I stress this to the point that returning students are likely very sick of hearing this. Time and time again, I see students trying to capture the same exact color they see in the photo. The problem is, that the photo itself is an inaccurate representation of the actual painting... Imagine a game of telephone, it is funny to hear the end result when the last player is far removed from the original sentence. We experience this same effect when studying from a book or even worse, an image online. If you use a book as a reference you are removed at minimum three times from the original painting. The original, the picture that was taken from the original, and the print into the book. This excludes any editing that may have happened.
Using an image from the internet is often much worse. Take a look at the four examples of "Strolling along the Seashore" by Joaquin Sorolla. Each example is unedited and taken from the internet. The top left image is closest to the original but nowhere near as elegant. Notice how grey and brown the top right image looks or the extreme purples in the water in the bottom right image. If we now try to zoom in on the image we see pixels instead of brush strokes and edge work...We must take these images with a grain of salt. So, how do we know what values, colors, edges, and other techniques the master painters used? We go to art museums!
It is absolutely amazing and humbling what you will see in real life versus an image, but I don't need to tell you this. How often do we say or hear, "I wish you could see it in person" or "The picture doesn't do it justice.'' This is just as true when we look at paintings in a museum as when we visit the Eiffel Tower or the Grand Canyon. You have to be there...
The Norman Rockwell Museum shows us an overwhelming amount of behind-the-scenes techniques used in his illustrations. One of my favorite memories while visiting the museum was noticing (with Theresa) that Rockwell must have projected his reference photos onto the canvas. His charcoal studies are very large, and detailed, and matched the final painting too closely for him to be doing this via measuring and free-hand techniques. Not that a master of Rockwell's caliber couldn't match his paintings to his drawings stroke for stroke, but it would take way too much time for unnecessary accuracies. Rockwell was on a deadline so getting a beautiful image quickly was his only concern. It was refreshing to see someone I look up to was human and used modern resources available at the time.
Rockwell's book "How I Make a Picture" confirmed what I saw at the museum as he writes about using a balopticon. It was such a great moment, I felt like a detective when my hypothesis was confirmed. If you would like to learn more about Rockwell's work process this book is wonderful. We only wish other Master painters could have done the same.
For the painters who didn't share their processes in a book we still have the museums. The Haggin Museum in Stockton CA, has the largest collection of JC Leyendeker paintings in the world and again, seeing these illustrations in person reveals so much about his process that no book or image from the internet could show us. We know Leyendecker would paint thumbnail studies before working on his final project. We also know he used a grid system to help get his paintings to scale from his smaller thumbnails, This is very efficient and used to this day.
What his books don't show us is how much paint he used, and how could they? The amount of paint used can't be explained because words like thin, a lot, and generous are all relative. If I suggest to three different students they need to paint "thick" we are probably going to see three different results. In the classroom, we show, through demos, how much paint to use. Just like we are shown how much paint Leyendecker used while looking at his paintings in person at the museum. Leyendecker paints large, so we can clearly see his brushstroke direction, grey gesso, and yes, sometimes the grid is visible in his final paintings.
I could go on and on about each of my favorite painters and what I've seen in life compared to books, including Bouguereau's thin to thick layers, Sagent's green skin tones, and more but technique breakdowns will be another subject. I hope you get a chance to see your favorite painter's work in person, as a professional or student, it's quite literally, eye-opening and life-changing. An experience no book will ever recreate.
Haggin Museum, Stockton CA.
San Diego Art Museum
(Traveling Exhibit)
New Orleans Museum of Art