If you want longer listening time between charges and a straightforward pair of wireless earbuds for PC, choose Sony WF-C500; if you need noise canceling and quick switching between two devices, choose Sony WF-C700N. For most PC users who work or study around other people, I’d choose the WF-C700N because its noise-control options and multipoint connection solve more everyday desk problems.
The WF-C500 makes more sense if you value its stated up-to-10-hour earbud battery life and don’t need noise canceling. Neither model is a foldable wireless headset for PC: both are compact, truly wireless in-ear earbuds, so the choice is really about battery, noise control, and how you move between devices.
If you want longer listening time between charges and straightforward wireless earbuds for PC, choose Sony WF-C500; if you need noise canceling and quick switching between two devices, choose Sony WF-C700N. For most PC users working or studying around other people, I’d choose the WF-C700N for its noise-control options and multipoint connection.
The WF-C500 is the simpler pick if you don’t need noise canceling and care more about its stated up-to-10-hour battery life per charge. Neither model is a foldable wireless headset for PC: both are truly wireless in-ear earbuds, so the decision comes down to battery life, noise control, and switching between devices.
• Sony WF-C500: Its standout strength is up to 10 hours of battery life from the earbuds, with up to 20 hours total using the case. Its trade-off is that it has no noise control.
• Sony WF-C700N: Its standout strengths are active noise canceling, adjustable ambient sound, and the ability to connect to two devices at once. Its trade-off is a stated battery life of up to 15 hours with the charging case, rather than the WF-C500’s stated 20-hour total.
• Both are small, lightweight, Bluetooth in-ear earbuds with built-in microphones and IPX4 water resistance.
• Choose the WF-C500 if you want a straightforward pair for listening and calls, with longer stated total battery life.
• Choose the WF-C700N if you want noise-control choices and a more convenient way to move between a PC and another connected device.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-21 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
For PC use, it covers the basics: Bluetooth connectivity, a built-in microphone for hands-free calls, and sound you can fine-tune through Sony’s Headphones Connect app. DSEE is intended to restore some high-frequency sound lost during compression, and the listed supported audio formats are SBC and AAC. Its small, light in-ear design and IPX4 water resistance also suit exercise or a commute where sweat and splashes are possible.
The central limitation is simple: the WF-C500 has no noise control. If you want earbuds that can actively reduce surrounding noise or let in more ambient sound through a dedicated mode, this is not the pair to choose. I’d consider it for a PC user who wants a compact everyday option and values the stated battery figures over noise-control features.
The WF-C700N is the more feature-focused option. Its active noise canceling is designed to reduce surrounding sound, while Ambient Sound mode uses feedforward microphones to bring more of the environment into your listening experience. That gives you two different approaches to a busy room: reduce distractions when concentrating, or stay more aware of what is happening around you.
Multipoint connection is particularly relevant at a desk. The earbuds can connect to two devices at once, which can make it easier to move between a PC and another device without repeatedly setting up the connection. They also include a built-in microphone for hands-free calls, Bluetooth connectivity, and IPX4 water resistance. Sony describes the earbuds as small and lightweight, with an ergonomic surface design intended for comfort.
The trade-off is battery life: Sony states up to 15 hours with the WF-C700N’s battery-life and quick-charge feature, and a 10-minute charge is listed as providing up to an hour of playback. That is less total listening time than the WF-C500’s stated up-to-20-hours-with-case figure. I’d pick the WF-C700N if controlling background noise and moving between two devices matter more to your PC routine than maximizing the stated total battery life.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for longer stated total battery life → Sony WF-C500. It is listed for up to 10 hours from the earbuds and up to 20 hours with the case.
• Best for hearing more of your surroundings → Sony WF-C700N. Ambient Sound mode uses microphones to capture more environmental sound.
• Best for switching between a PC and another device → Sony WF-C700N. Its multipoint connection supports two devices at once.
• Best for basic PC calls and listening → Either. Both have Bluetooth and a built-in microphone; neither is described as a dedicated gaming or PC headset.
• Best for sweat and splashes → A tie. Both carry an IPX4 water-resistance rating.
• Best if you want sound adjustments through Sony’s app → Sony WF-C500. Its listed features include fine-tuning through the Headphones Connect app.
• Best if you want a conventional over-ear or foldable headset → Neither. These are in-ear earbuds, not foldable wireless headsets.
A phrase like “best in ear earbuds for PC” can cover very different needs. If you mean earbuds for calls, music, and general computer use, both models have relevant basics. If you mean noise control and easy device switching, the WF-C700N has the clearer feature advantage. If battery life is your priority and you can do without noise control, the WF-C500 is the more direct fit.
Parents searching for a “best kids headset for PC” should be careful not to treat either model as a children’s headset: the product information describes both for adults. For a buyer specifically seeking a “foldable wireless headset for PC,” neither is a match; both are compact earbuds with charging cases, not folding headsets. Those differences matter more than the broad label of wireless audio.
My Verdict
I’d especially value the option to reduce distractions or stay aware of the room, then connect to two devices at once.
The WF-C500 is the better fit if its longer stated total battery life matters more than noise control.
For my PC recommendation, though, I’d choose the WF-C700N.
For a busy workspace or a setup involving two devices, the WF-C700N has the more relevant features: active noise canceling, Ambient Sound mode, and multipoint. The WF-C500 is a simpler option with longer stated total battery life.
The WF-C700N includes active noise canceling and Ambient Sound mode. The WF-C500 is listed with no noise-control feature.
Sony lists the WF-C500 for up to 10 hours from the earbuds and up to 20 hours total with the case. The WF-C700N is listed for up to 15 hours with its battery-life and quick-charge feature, so compare the stated figures with the distinction between earbuds-only and case-inclusive listening time in mind.
No. Both are true wireless in-ear earbuds, not foldable headsets. If you specifically want a folding over-ear design, these two products do not fit that format.
• Logitech Zone Vibe vs NUROUM OpenEar Pro
• BEARTWO Headset vs Amazon Renewed JBL Endurance Peak
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.