Many options are available to provide you with the solution to hair loss and premature balding. The two effective solutions are Scalp Micropigmentation (SMP) and Hair Transplant.

If you have already tried several advertised products in the media but didn’t see any visible results, then read this article until the end. This article will discuss the best hair loss solution with visible results.

There are mainly two result-oriented solutions available one is Hair Transplant, and the second is Scalp Micropigmentation. We will compare both to know which option will be best for you. Let’s start with an introduction to both treatments.

What is Scalp Micropigmentation?

Scalp Micropigmentation is a non-surgical hair tattoo procedure. Once done, it replicates a natural shaved head look that gives you a fuller hair-like appearance. It is considered a permanent solution, lasting up to 6 years or more. However, it starts to lighten after 4 to 6 years, and you will need further touch-up sessions.

In the SMP procedure, Asthetecian adds a small amount of pigment to the head's thinning or balding area. In comparison with hair transplant results, SMP seems much more natural. However, it looks like a tattoo process, but in actuality, it is not. As in Scalp Micropigmentation, different specialist equipment is used and needs retouching every year to keep it in the desired shape. The final results might require a few more sessions.

What is Hair Transplantation?

On the other side, hair transplantation is a surgical procedure where hair follicles are transplanted from the donor site of the head to another. This process helps grow hair on the head's part where the hair is thinning or receding.

Difference Between Both Of Them

Now after understanding the definition of both terms, let’s find out the difference between them. At first sight, Scalp Micro-pigmentation is not about real hair growth but the ink that looks like hairs on the scalp. On the other side, Hair Transplantation is a process in which natural hairs grow on the head. So, we can say that Hair Transplant is related to natural hair growth, but micro-pigmentation on the scalp is not related to natural hair. Additionally, hair transplantation is expensive and takes time to get healed and complete. Let’s find other differences one by one:

Scalp Micro-Pigmentation

It is a non-surgical alternative to hair transplant surgery.

Under this process, small amounts of pigment are applied to the scalp to mimic the hair follicles, which creates a natural, fuller-looking hairline.

It is used to make the hair look fuller, mask scars and birthmarks, or enhance the appearance of a hair transplant.

Hair Transplant

It is a surgical process, also known as follicular unit restoration (FUT), that can help restore a receding hairline and add volume to the hair.

Under this process, healthy hair follicles are removed from a donor site and inserted into the area of the scalp where hair is thinning or has become bald.

It is used to collect follicular units that are then inserted into the area of the scalp where baldness or thinning is present.

Which Treatment Is Right For You?

However, both processes have their benefits, but you should select one of them according to your need and the look you desire. Some people undergo both treatments as micro pigmentation can be used to enhance the results of hair transplant treatment by creating an appearance of fuller coverage. It also masks the scars on the donor site that enhance the natural look of hairs.

If you want to avoid surgery, micro-pigmentation will be the best option to provide a natural hair look. Those with a limited donor supply may also benefit from micro-pigmentation as it can give hair a look without even making it grow.

In another case, if you want natural hair, you should go for hair transplantation. Under this, you will physically restore the hairline or add fullness to thinning hair. So, choose on your own if you want to grow natural hair or give the illusion of more hair. Where hair transplantation replaces lost hair with a patient’s natural hair, SMP provides mimic hairs.

Time and Permanency

Now, there are mainly two questions. One is when you should go for a hair transplant or scalp micro-pigmentation and how much time they take to show desired results, and the second is which procedure gives the permanent results.

Firstly talk about time:

When should you Go for Micro-pigmentation or Hair Transplant?

The main problem in any of these procedures is sweat on the scalp, which can worsen the healing process. That's why you should go for these procedures in the winter. Because in winter, you won't sweat much because of the cooler weather. That's why it is easier to keep your scalp clean and sweat-free.

How Much Time Does Both Of The Process Take?

The hair transplant takes between four and eight hours complete, and results can begin to show themselves as early as four to six weeks after the treatment, but your final effect won’t be noticeable until five to six months after. Some patients can also take up to 18 months to see the desired results. So, the time for results is not the same for everyone as it depends from case to case.

Another side, SMP takes 30 minutes to 5-6 hours to proceed, depending on the area of treatment. It shows the initial results on the same day and gives a natural desired look after 3 or 4 sessions. You can expect the final results within three months, as you might need to go for touch-up sessions.

Conclusion

However, we can see both processes have their benefits, but SMP is still better as it can give the desired results sooner than a hair transplant. It ensures you get a natural hair look faster, less costly, and without surgical treatment. So, this whole discussion concludes that SMP is better than a hair transplant because they provide real results in less time and at a lower cost. https://delawarescalpmicropigmentation.com/