If you want long battery life and padded on-ear headphones, choose JBL Tune 510; if you need compact, truly wireless earbuds with a secure-fit design, choose Skullcandy Indy True. For hunting, I’d favor the JBL for its 40-hour battery life and over-ear style, while Indy is the more portable option when you specifically want earbuds.
• JBL Tune 510 strength: Up to 40 hours of battery life, with a quick-charge feature; trade-off: it is an on-ear headphone, not a small, truly wireless earbud.
• Skullcandy Indy True strength: Separate in-ear buds with removable stability gels and IP55 resistance to sweat, water, and dust; trade-off: total battery life is up to 16 hours.
• JBL Tune 510 is for: listeners who want long-running, foldable headphones with padded ear cushions and device switching.
• Skullcandy Indy True is for: listeners who prioritize a compact wireless setup, in-ear fit, touch controls, and resistance to everyday exposure to sweat, water, and dust.
• These products answer different versions of the same buying question. The JBL Tune 510 is a pair of on-ear Bluetooth headphones; the Skullcandy Indy True is a set of genuinely wireless earbuds. That difference matters more than the brand name if you’re comparing skullcandy vs jbl earbuds for a specific routine. One gives you long battery life and cushioned ear contact. The other keeps a headband and cable out of the picture.
• Neither product is listed as providing noise control. Indy is described as having sound isolation, but that is not the same as active noise cancellation. For hunting, don’t treat either item as hearing protection or assume it will make it safe to miss sounds around you. Their listed features don’t establish that use.
The JBL Tune 510 is the more natural fit if you want headphones you can put on for a long stretch without managing separate earbuds. Its on-ear design has soft, padded ear cushions, and JBL describes the headphones as lightweight and foldable. That combination suits a commute, a work session, or listening at home, with the option to fold them for carrying when you’re done. The listed weight is 159 grams.
Battery life is the JBL’s clearest practical advantage. It is specified for up to 40 hours, and a five-minute charge is said to provide up to two additional hours of listening. A full charge takes two hours according to the listed battery details. That can reduce the need to charge every day, though actual battery life can vary with use. Bluetooth 5 allows wireless listening, and multipoint connections are designed to let you move between two Bluetooth devices without repeatedly starting from scratch.
JBL’s Pure Bass sound is a stated feature, so this model may suit someone who likes a bass-forward presentation. Push-button media controls keep basic operation on the headphones. The trade-off is the on-ear format: it is larger than a pair of earbuds and rests on the ears rather than sitting inside them. If you want the smallest possible carry, or an in-ear fit, Indy is the closer match.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-19 · 9 min read · Independent comparison
Who should skip it: Skip the JBL Tune 510 if you specifically want separate earbuds, or if you need listed noise control or water- and dust-resistance details.
For someone searching for over ear headphones for hunting, the JBL has the more relevant shape of the two, but it is described as on-ear, not over-ear. That distinction matters: it rests on the ears, so it isn’t a true over-ear model. Its long battery life and foldable design may be useful for ordinary listening before or after an outing, but the specs do not establish protection from sound or suitability as hunting equipment. Keep awareness and hearing safety ahead of audio convenience.
Indy True is the pick for someone who wants two small earbuds with no wire joining them. The in-ear design and pocket-sized charging case are aimed at portability, while removable stability gels are included to help hold the buds in place. Fit is especially important with this style: the product information notes that poorly matched ear tips or an improper fit can affect sound and call performance. Choosing a snug fit is therefore part of getting the intended experience, not just a comfort detail.
The earbuds offer up to 16 hours of total battery life, and Bluetooth 5 handles the wireless connection. The listed controls are touch-based, covering calls, tracks, and volume. That puts several basic actions on the buds themselves, but some listeners may prefer physical buttons, particularly when they want a more definite press. The sheet identifies sound isolation, but it does not list active noise cancellation or a noise-control feature like adjustable transparency.
Indy’s IP55 rating is a meaningful distinction in this comparison: the product is described as resistant to sweat, water, and dust. That can make it a more practical choice for active everyday use than the JBL, whose sheet does not provide a comparable resistance rating. Still, resistance is not a claim that the earbuds are waterproof or suitable for every wet or dusty environment. Their shorter stated battery life is the main compromise against the JBL’s 40 hours.
Who should skip it: Skip Indy True if you want the longest listed battery life, padded ear cushions, or button controls rather than touch controls.
If you’re looking for the best clip on earbuds for hunting, neither product is actually a clip-on design. Indy is an in-ear earbud with stability gels, not an ear-hook or clip-on model. It may appeal if your priority is compact, wire-free listening, but its listed features do not show that it is designed for hunting or for hearing protection. The phrase clip on earbuds for hunting points to a different style than either of these products provides.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for longer listening between charges → JBL Tune 510. Its listed battery life is up to 40 hours, compared with up to 16 hours total for Indy True.
• Best for a truly wireless, separate-earbud design → Skullcandy Indy True. There is no wire connecting the buds.
• Best for resistance to sweat, water, and dust → Skullcandy Indy True. It has an IP55 rating; the JBL sheet provides no matching rating.
• Best for switching between two Bluetooth devices → JBL Tune 510. Multipoint connection is listed as a feature.
• Best for touch controls on the earbuds → Skullcandy Indy True. Its controls cover calls, tracks, and volume.
• Best for a quick battery top-up → JBL Tune 510. A five-minute charge is specified to provide up to two hours of listening.
• Best for a foldable headphone design → JBL Tune 510. Indy’s advantage is a compact earbud-and-case setup, not a folding headband.
A practical way to settle the choice is to picture where the product will go when it isn’t being used. The JBL folds for carrying, but it remains a pair of headphones with a band and ear cushions. Indy’s buds and charging case offer a smaller, separate-piece setup, though their fit depends on selecting suitable ear tips and positioning the stability gels comfortably.
Think about controls, too. The JBL uses push-button media controls, which may feel more straightforward if you prefer a physical press. Indy uses touch controls for calls, tracks, and volume. Neither approach is automatically better; it comes down to whether you want buttons on a headphone or touch operation on small earbuds.
For hunting-related listening, make the decision conservatively. Neither sheet describes a hearing-protection function, and neither is presented as a hunting-specific product. The JBL may be more appealing for its longer battery life, while Indy’s resistance rating and compact design may suit an active routine. Those are general product distinctions, not proof that either one is safe or appropriate for use while hunting. Don’t rely on audio gear to protect your hearing or preserve awareness of your surroundings.
Before choosing, decide whether you want on-ear headphones or in-ear buds. The JBL Tune 510 has padded cushions that rest on the ears and a foldable form. Skullcandy Indy True sits inside the ears and comes with removable stability gels. If in-ear products tend to be uncomfortable for you, the Indy’s fit is a significant consideration; if you dislike a headband or ear cushions, the JBL may be the wrong shape.
Next, consider how you charge and control your audio. JBL’s listed figures include up to 40 hours of battery life, a two-hour full charge, and a quick charge that adds up to two hours of listening from five minutes of charging. Indy is listed for up to 16 hours total and uses touch controls. These are the product specifications, not a guarantee of identical runtime in every situation.
My Verdict
In my opinion, I’d choose the JBL Tune 510 for general listening because its listed 40-hour battery life, quick-charge feature, padded cushions, and multipoint connection make a persuasive everyday combination. For hunting, I would consider it only for listening before or after the activity—not as hearing protection or hunting equipment. If I wanted compact, truly wireless earbuds with IP55 resistance, I’d choose Indy instead.
The listed design is on-ear, with padded ear cushions resting on the ears. It is not described as an over-ear model, so the distinction matters if you specifically want headphones that surround your ears.
The JBL Tune 510 is listed for up to 40 hours of battery life. Skullcandy Indy True is listed for up to 16 hours total, so JBL has the longer stated runtime.
Indy True is rated IP55 and described as resistant to sweat, water, and dust. That is not a claim that the earbuds are waterproof or safe for every water exposure.
Neither product is identified as hunting equipment or hearing protection. The JBL has longer listed battery life, while Indy is more compact and has an IP55 rating; don’t use either as a substitute for hearing protection or awareness of your surroundings.
• Cableguys Buds Pro Stitch vs Generic Earbuds Active Noise
• Redragon H510 vs Xmenha Open Ear Open-Back: Gaming Headset
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.