If you want wireless listening with adjustable active noise cancellation, choose Bose QuietComfort 35; if you need a wired, closed-back headphone with sound isolation, choose Sennheiser HD 569. For a kid, the Bose is the more practical pick when wireless freedom and noise control matter most, while the Sennheiser makes sense for listening in a fixed spot.
• Bose QuietComfort 35: Bluetooth, Alexa access, and three levels of active noise cancellation; its trade-off is that wireless listening depends on its battery.
• Sennheiser HD 569: A wired, closed-back design with large velour ear cushions and two cable options; its trade-off is that it does not offer Bluetooth.
• Bose fits: Listeners who move between rooms, travel, or want to adjust noise cancellation.
• Sennheiser fits: Listeners who stay near their audio source and prefer a wired connection with a remote and microphone on one cable.
The QuietComfort 35 II is an over-ear Bluetooth headphone with active noise cancellation. Its three cancellation levels let the listener choose how much environmental sound to reduce, rather than treating noise control as a single on-or-off setting. That flexibility is useful in changing settings: a quieter space may call for a lower level, while a noisy commute or flight may call for more. The specific effect will depend on the environment, but the adjustable control is the useful distinction here.
Wireless playback is the other practical advantage. Bose lists an average battery life of 20 hours, and the headphones can also connect through a 3.5 mm jack. That gives the listener two connection options, though wired use does not change the fact that Bluetooth and active noise cancellation are central parts of the design. The package includes a 12-inch USB cable and a 42-inch audio cable, so the supplied wired lead is a different length from the charging cable.
The model includes Alexa voice access and a noise-rejecting dual-microphone system intended to help with voice pickup. Bose Connect supports setup, Bluetooth connection management, and noise-cancellation adjustments. In other words, the QC 35 is more than a basic wireless listening device: its app and voice-control features are part of the experience. Buyers who do not want app setup or voice features can simply focus on its wireless and noise-control functions.
For a kid, I would favor the Bose when the priority is avoiding a cable that can catch or tangle during everyday movement. Its over-ear design and Rose Gold finish are identifiable details, but the sheet describes it for adults, so it does not establish a child-specific fit. The Bose is also the more natural of these two choices for a family trip where a listener may want Bluetooth and selectable noise cancellation. The included audio cable provides an alternative connection, but the battery still matters for wireless use.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-18 · 8 min read · Independent comparison
The HD 569 takes the opposite approach. It is a wired, closed-back, around-ear headphone, so there is no Bluetooth connection or battery to manage. Its cable is three meters long, which gives someone seated near a computer, stereo, or other audio source room to move without placing the source right beside them. That same length can be inconvenient for walking around or carrying the headphone through a busy day.
Sennheiser describes the closed-back construction as providing sound isolation and reducing ambient noise. That is different from Bose’s three-level active noise cancellation: the HD 569 relies on its physical, closed-back design rather than an adjustable electronic cancellation system. Its large ear cups have velour cushions, and the headband is padded. Those details point toward extended listening at a desk or at home, where comfort over a longer session can matter more than a compact wireless routine.
The two included cable options add flexibility within the wired design. One has an in-line one-button remote and microphone for phone-call control; the other is a separate cable without that described remote feature. The listed 38-millimeter drivers and 20 Hz–20,000 Hz frequency range give useful technical context, but those figures alone cannot tell a shopper exactly how the headphone will sound with every recording or device. Sennheiser also describes its transducer and E.A.R. design as directing audio toward the ears for a more in-room listening presentation.
The HD 569 makes sense for someone who listens at a desk, wants the option of a cable-mounted microphone, or prefers not to keep a headphone charged. It is also the more straightforward pick if the intended use is a fixed listening station rather than commuting. But it is not the obvious choice for a kid who needs to move freely around a room or use Bluetooth with a phone or tablet. The wired setup is simple, but the long cable can become one more thing to handle.
Who should skip it: Skip the Sennheiser if wireless listening, active noise cancellation, or easy movement away from the audio source is essential.
• Best for Bluetooth listening → Bose QuietComfort 35. It supports Bluetooth, while the HD 569 is wired.
• Best for adjustable active noise cancellation → Bose QuietComfort 35. It offers three cancellation levels; the Sennheiser uses closed-back sound isolation.
• Best for avoiding battery management → Sennheiser HD 569. Its wired design does not depend on charging for listening.
• Best for moving around without a cable → Bose QuietComfort 35. Bluetooth removes the listening cable during wireless use.
• Best for a long cable at a desk → Sennheiser HD 569. Its listed cable length is three meters.
• Best for a cable-mounted call remote → Sennheiser HD 569. One of its two cables includes a one-button remote and microphone.
• Best for voice access and app-supported settings → Bose QuietComfort 35. Alexa access and Bose Connect add those options.
• Best for a kid who will use headphones while moving around → Bose QuietComfort 35, in my opinion. Its wireless option avoids a trailing cable, though neither sheet specifies a child-sized fit.
Before choosing, think about where the headphones will be used most. A listener moving between a car, waiting area, and seat on a flight may value Bluetooth and adjustable noise cancellation more than a cable-based setup. That makes the Bose the more versatile design for travel. The HD 569 can reduce ambient sound through its closed-back construction, but its cable keeps it tethered to the device.
The distinction matters for remote work, too. Someone searching for the best lightweight head phones for remote work should not assume either model is lightweight based only on its name or appearance. The available specifications list item weights, but those figures do not establish how either model will feel during a full workday. Instead, compare the supplied features with the routine: the Bose includes Bluetooth, a dual-microphone system, and Alexa access, while the Sennheiser includes a cable with an in-line microphone and remote. Those are different approaches to calls and daily listening.
A headset Christmas gift also calls for thinking about how the recipient listens. The Bose has a Rose Gold finish and wireless features, while the Sennheiser has a black, wired design with velour-covered cushions. If the recipient expects wireless playback, the Sennheiser is a poor match regardless of its comfort features. If they usually listen at a desk and appreciate having a cable remote, the HD 569 may be the more suitable choice.
One search phrase worth clearing up: neither product is an earbud, so neither is the best sports earbuds for airplane. These are over-ear headphones. For airplane use, the Bose’s wireless connection and active noise cancellation are more aligned with the stated features, while the Sennheiser’s isolation comes from its closed-back design and requires a wired connection. Neither data sheet describes sports-specific construction or child sizing, so I would not infer either.
Finally, decide whether you want an app and voice features. The Bose can use Bose Connect for setup, connection management, noise adjustment, and updates, and Alexa access is part of its feature set. The Sennheiser is simpler in this respect: it is wired, with its call control located on one cable. Neither arrangement is automatically better. The right choice is the one that suits the listener’s devices and habits.
I would choose the Bose QuietComfort 35 for a kid if wireless movement and adjustable active noise cancellation are the priorities. Its Bluetooth connection, 20-hour average battery life, and three cancellation levels make it the more flexible option for travel and everyday transitions. I would pick the Sennheiser HD 569 instead for a stationary listener who prefers a wired connection, long cable, and in-line call control. For the kid-focused use case, my recommendation is Bose.
The Bose has Bluetooth and three levels of active noise cancellation, which suit a listener who wants wireless use and adjustable noise control. The Sennheiser is also closed-back and offers sound isolation, but it is wired and does not list active noise cancellation.
Neither product’s data sheet specifies a child-sized fit; both are described as adult headphones. For a kid who needs to move around, I would lean toward the Bose because Bluetooth avoids a cable during wireless listening. Check the fit and intended supervision needs before choosing.
Yes. One of its two included cables has an in-line one-button remote and microphone for call control. The other listed cable option should not be assumed to include that same feature.
Value depends on which features the listener will actually use, not on a universal winner. Check the current price on Amazon before deciding: the Bose’s case for its value is wireless listening, active noise cancellation, and voice and app features; the Sennheiser’s is its wired design, two cable options, and velour ear cushions.
• how Logitech Zone Vibe compares to awatrue Headset
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.