If you want a lightweight, wired pair with a detachable cable for vlogging, choose Sennheiser Pro Audio Professional; if you need wireless listening and exceptionally long battery life, choose Marshall Major IV On-Ear.
For a camera-side monitoring setup, I’d lean toward the Sennheiser.
Sennheiser Pro Audio Professional vs Marshall Major IV On-Ear at a Glance
• Sennheiser Pro Audio Professional: Closed-back, wired on-ear headphones with a detachable single-sided cable; the trade-off is that they aren’t wireless.
• Marshall Major IV On-Ear: Bluetooth listening, more than 80 hours of stated wireless playtime, and foldable design; the trade-off is that they have no listed noise-control feature.
• Sennheiser is for: Creators who prioritize lightweight wired monitoring and a cable they can replace.
• Marshall is for: Listeners who value wireless freedom, long battery life, and controls on the headphones.
The Sennheiser HD 25 is a straightforward, closed-back on-ear headphone designed with DJing, studio monitoring, and sound reinforcement in mind. Its lightweight construction and stated 140 g weight make it appealing for long sessions when you want to keep headphones on while checking audio. The design is wired, with a 3.5 mm jack and a screw-on adapter for a larger 6.3 mm connection.
For vlogging, that makes sense if your priority is monitoring sound from a compatible camera, recorder, or other wired source. The detachable, single-sided cable is a practical advantage: it can be disconnected rather than remaining permanently attached if you need to pack the headphones or replace the cable. The stated sound isolation is relevant when you’re listening in a busy environment, though this is not a claim of active noise cancellation.
I’d choose the Sennheiser if you want a light, direct monitoring option and don’t mind being tethered to your recording device. Skip it if you mainly want Bluetooth playback, long wireless sessions, or the convenience of controlling calls and music from the headphones. The product information describes high sensitivity and the ability to handle very high sound pressure levels, but those details don’t make it a wireless or camera-specific system.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-22 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
The Major IV’s practical strengths extend beyond playback. Its multidirectional control knob handles music playback, volume, power, and phone functions. The headphones fold into a more compact shape, and a 3.5 mm socket provides a wired listening option or lets a friend connect. For a vlogger, that makes them a plausible everyday pair for reviewing edits or listening between recording sessions, provided the wireless setup suits the device and workflow.
I’d pick Marshall if wireless convenience and battery life matter more than a dedicated, lightweight wired monitoring setup. The trade-off is that the listed noise control is “None,” so you shouldn’t choose it expecting a stated isolation feature. Its on-ear design may suit someone who wants compact headphones, but it isn’t described as a purpose-built monitoring model in the product information.
• Best for a wired monitoring setup → Sennheiser Pro Audio Professional. It connects through a 3.5 mm jack and includes a screw-on 6.3 mm adapter.
• Best for wireless listening → Marshall Major IV On-Ear. Bluetooth connectivity avoids a cable during ordinary listening.
• Best for extended time away from a charger → Marshall Major IV On-Ear. Its stated wireless playtime exceeds 80 hours, and a short charge is specified to provide 15 hours.
• Best for a lightweight option → Sennheiser Pro Audio Professional. Its listed weight is 140 g, and it is described as lightweight for prolonged use.
• Best for a replaceable cable connection → Sennheiser Pro Audio Professional. Its single-sided cable is detachable.
• Best for playback and call controls on the headphones → Marshall Major IV On-Ear. Its multidirectional control knob supports music, volume, power, and phone functions.
• Best for a compact fold-away design → Marshall Major IV On-Ear. Its fold clip lets the headphones fold into a more compact size.
• Best for creators looking at headband headphones for vlogging → Sennheiser Pro Audio Professional, if wired monitoring is the priority. Neither model is an open-ear design, and neither is a pair of wireless earbuds; those categories may suit different recording or listening needs.
For a vlogging setup, the choice comes down to what role the headphones play. If they’ll stay connected to a camera or recorder while you check audio, Sennheiser’s wired design, detachable cable, and closed-back construction make it the more focused option. If you want one pair for wireless listening during commutes, breaks, and editing, Marshall has the more convenient feature set.
That distinction matters because listening headphones and recording monitors don’t solve exactly the same problem. The Marshall’s wireless playback and call controls are useful away from a shoot, but the product information does not list a noise-control feature. The Sennheiser is described for studio monitoring and sound reinforcement, but it doesn’t offer Bluetooth or the long-playtime battery convenience found on the Marshall.
Neither model should be mistaken for a microphone. Choosing headphones for vlogging helps you monitor or review audio; it doesn’t, by itself, capture your voice. Likewise, a search for the best wireless earbuds for vlogging is asking for a different form factor and use case than these on-ear headphones provide. If you prefer open ear headphones for vlogging, neither model fits that description: both are on-ear designs, and the Sennheiser is specifically closed-back.
There are also useful everyday differences in how each handles a session. Sennheiser keeps the connection simple: plug into a compatible source and listen, with the cable attached on one side and removable. Marshall asks you to manage charging if you use it wirelessly, but the stated battery duration is substantial, and the headphone controls reduce the need to reach for a connected device. Its 3.5 mm socket gives you a wired alternative, though the product information does not specify whether every feature operates the same way when connected by cable.
Comfort claims should be read in context. Sennheiser is described as very lightweight and comfortable for extended use. Marshall’s product information emphasizes softer ear cushions and an ergonomic shape. Those are useful design cues, but personal fit is individual, and the specifications don’t establish which will feel better on every head or ear. If you know you dislike on-ear pressure, neither description can guarantee a comfortable fit for you.
I would buy the Sennheiser Pro Audio Professional for a vlogging setup centered on wired audio monitoring.
Its lightweight design, closed-back construction, and detachable cable fit that job better than Marshall’s wireless-first feature set.
I’d choose the Marshall instead if I wanted one pair for long stretches of wireless everyday listening.
For vlogging specifically, my pick is Sennheiser, as long as a wired connection works with your gear.
For wired monitoring while recording or checking audio, I’d choose the Sennheiser HD 25: it is described for studio monitoring and has a detachable cable. Marshall is the stronger fit if wireless listening and extended battery life matter more.
The product information lists no noise-control feature for Major IV. Sennheiser’s HD 25 is listed with sound isolation, but that should not be confused with active noise cancellation.
No wireless connection is listed for the HD 25; it uses a wired 3.5 mm connection. Its cable is detachable, but that does not make the headphones wireless.
Marshall Major IV has Bluetooth, a foldable design, headphone controls, and a stated wireless battery life exceeding 80 hours. Sennheiser is lighter by its listed weight, but it requires a cable for listening.
• Betron AX5 or BESTGOT Headphones: which is better
• our ZHUTA KMOUK Gaming Earbuds vs DCMEKA DEMAKE pick
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.