Spice up your fap sessions with a random fap roulette! Press the button at the bottom-right of your screen to roll for a random roulette. Match the letters and numbers in the top-right of your screen to the corresponding letters and numbers on the roulette that you rolled for to see what you have to do. To add to the experience, try to restrict yourself to the numbers you rolled for on your first roll.
Self Suck
Solosuck.com Forums -- Use the links at the top and bottom of the page to visit the rest of my solosuck.com Website. You need to be a logged-in member of the forums to see the videos and pictures in the posts. You can post pictures and videos up to 200MB.
Stories that feature guys that can suck themselves off thanks to their possessing a very large cock (usually this tag is limited to stories in which self-sucking features prominently in the narrative).
Michel Foucault cites Artemidorus' Oneirocritica as identifying the act of "taking [one's] sex organ into one's [own] mouth" as one of three ways to commit "relations with oneself." Artemidorus thought that dreams of this "unnatural" act portended the death of one's children, loss of one's mistresses, or extreme poverty.[4]
Autofellatio is a niche in pornography.[7][8][9] While relatively few pornographic films involve autofellatio, some pornographic actors are noted for this skill, including Ron Jeremy for his 1970s examples on film.[10][11] Other actors, including Scott O'Hara, Cole Youngblood, Steve Holmes, and Ricky Martinez, have also been featured performing autofellatio. In Brian W. Aldiss' 1970 semi-autobiographical novel The Hand-Reared Boy, he describes group masturbation practices at a British boys' boarding school. One boy with an especially large penis is capable of fellating himself, a fact which the narrator, Horatio Stubbs, verifies.[12]
The term may be insulting to a man's masculinity, implying that someone performs autofellatio due either to extremely high self-regard or inability to get someone else to do it for him. This was the sense in which the term was used by President Donald Trump's former White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci, when he said of strategist Steve Bannon, "I'm not Steve Bannon, I'm not trying to suck my own cock."[21]
The majority of artificially reared calves develops abnormal oral behavior in terms of manipulating substrates or a pen-mate and tongue rolling [8,9]. However, such abnormal behaviors are rarely observed in naturally reared calves [10]. Milk sucking from the udder of heifers or cows is a frequent problem in dairy herds and may lead to udder damage, mastitis, milk loss, and culling of breeding animals. Such inter-sucking in cows was suggested to be a continuation of a habit that was already established in a calf-hood period [8].
Several strategies have been applied to minimize cross-sucking when calves are artificially fed [11,12]. Calves usually receive a restricted amount of whole milk or milk substitute (2-3 lb./meal/calf). The milk is usually consumed within 1 min, and thereafter, calves start sucking each other on different parts of the body, a behavior described as cross-sucking. This abnormal sucking is most intense during the first 6 min and then declines till 15 min after the milk ingestion when it stops [13]. Cross-sucking is considered a redirected natural sucking behavior toward peers, where calves started to suck each other, and the use of accessories that facilitate natural sucking behavior including teat-buckets, simple teat-feeders, and computer-controlled milk feeders could significantly reduce cross-sucking among calves [14,15]. Weaned heifers should have access to a ration which fulfills their energetic and behavioral needs to ensure optimal transition from pre-ruminant calves to ruminants. Hence, cross-sucking among calves is a behavior initiated and developed during the period of calf rearing, and its expression is reduced significantly by the offer of an enriched environment [16].
Photos from calves and cows involved in abnormal oral behavior. (a, b) Cross-sucking in calves after bucket feeding, (c) A cow engaged in self-sucking while the rest of the group was feeding), (d) A cow is sucking its neighbor, (e) teat elongation in a cow was involved in self- and cross-sucking.
Cross-sucking in calves, (a) there were no significant differences between male and female calves in cross-sucking (t(1,36)=1.02, p=0.32), (b) the percentage of calves shown abscesses formations in ears and navels were not different between the two examined farms, (c) calves were divided according to their body weight at 20th week into gainers and non-gainers, (d) percentage of suckers was calculated for gainers and non-gainers calves.
In this study, we showed that cross-sucking in calves was associated with reduced body weight at weaning (Figure-2d). The body weight of calves at the age of weaning is presented in Table-1. Furthermore, when calves were divided according to their body weight at 20th week of age into gainers and non-gainers (Figure-2c), about 71% of non-gainers were involved in sucking (Figure-2d). In previous studies, cross-suckers suffered from abscesses at ears and navel, and bezoars (hair all formation) in the 4th stomach was reported in veal calves at slaughterhouses [22]. If this abnormal behavior persisted in heifers, expressed as milk sucking in adulthood, culling is the necessary taken measure [14]. Some studies reported that increased milk and energy intake could reduce the incidences of non-nutritive sucking and cross-sucking [12,23-25]. Other studies reported that gradual weaning was found to reduce cross-sucking [15,26]. This study partially supports the hypothesis of insufficient oral satisfaction as an initiator of cross-sucking in calves that may persist and consolidate in the form of milk sucking in adulthood [27].
Results from California mastitis test in animals of both farms revealed that inter-sucking in cows led to increased mastitis incidences (about 54-53% mastitis in one quarter, 10-13% mastitis in 2 quarters, and 20-24% mastitis in 3 quarters) and elongation of the front teats. As a consequence of self- or inter-sucking in cows, there was elongation in front teats of sucker cows compared to that of non-sucked cows (Table-2; shown the percentage of front teat elongation). In sucked cows, front and not rear teat elongation (Figure-1e) could be possibly explained due to that fact that front is more easily accessible than the rear teats.
In addition, low BCS and interval to first service were negatively influenced since there is a genetic correlation between fertility (days to first service and non-return rate) and BCS. Moreover, cows that are thinner (lower BCS) have longer calving intervals [35,36]. Milk sucking reduces reproductive performance in terms of prolonged intervals to first post-partum estrus reaching to 3.5 months compared to about 40 days in normal cows, plus irregular estrous and increased the percentage of prolonged calving interval (Table-2 shows post-partum estrus and calving interval of sucker cows). This was in agreement with previous reports [20]. In addition, low BCS was observed in sucker cows; a fact that is correlated with a high incidence of repeat anestrus. It is also found that there is a high incidence of endometritis in cows with moderate and severe degrees of urovagina [37]. Furthermore, reduced reproductive performance in dairy cows with low BCS may be related to the acute angle of the tail (horizontal position of the vulva) that may result in the accumulation of urine and feces in the vulva, vagina, and endometritis [20].
The behavioral responses between suckers and non-sucker cows in regard to parlor entry and stockmen approaches are presented in Table-3. The results may refer to relatively high tension or anxiety during milking in terms of increased mean time of entry and dunging to the parlor. Approaching to stockmen and flight distance were also measured. Inter-sucker cows appeared to have greater values for mean entry time and dunging in parlor, longer flight distance, and lower values for approach to observer compared to non-suckers (Table-3). The obtained results may be related to signs of discomfort or pain as a result of subclinical mastitis.
Self-sucking is an abnormal behavior lead to important economic losses for dairy farms. The objective of this study was to evaluate tongue piercing as a novel technique to prevent self-sucking in cattle and buffaloes. The study was carried out on 26 cows and 4 buffaloes suffered from self-sucking. Tongue piercing was achieved by the application of an implant in the midline of the tongue and anterior to the frenulum linguae. With a follow up period of 6 months.
This implant produced mechanical disruption of the affected animals ability to curl their tongues, in a U- shape manner, subsequently it was impossible for these animals to cup their tongues and suck its own teats. Slight swelling around the piercing site of the tongue was observed among all animals on the first 3 days after surgery. No other complications have been reported.
Tongue piercing is an effective, rapid, easy, minimally invasive technique to prevent self-sucking among cattle and buffaloes, moreover, the technique was more widely acceptable by the owners than other traditional and surgical methods.
Self-sucking causes significant financial losses for dairy farms by lowering milk yield and causing udder damage and mastitis. Moreover, the affected animal can be left out of breeding in early periods due to only this kind of behavioral defect [5].
To prevent self-sucking, a variety of conservative methods (halters or cradles, pronged nose rings, weaning rings, and nose flaps) were used, but these methods are ineffective as the relapse rate is considerable, and may cause severe injuries to the affected animal as well as neighboring animals. Additionally, the affected animal regarded as of lower quality in markets [6,7,8]. Because of the failure of these methods to solve the problem, their complications, and their unacceptability by the owners, surgical treatment became the most dependable and radical solution for preventing self-suckling in cattle and buffaloes [3].
38c6e68cf9