And on some level, he's probably right or at least believes it, but it so often felt like two sides of himself were warring. He was a desperate father who wanted a better life for his daughter. But he also was this man with a deep-seated vendetta against Murphy that was rooted in misogynistic, abusive violence.
Kid: Hey, you're not Drugs!
Chang: Oh, but I aaaaaaam! Disappointed? Did you expect me to stay the same forever? 'Cause that's not what Drugs does, baby! I'm gonna deep fry your dog and eat yo momma's face, and I'm gonna wear your little brother's skin like pajamas! I control your lives, and there is nothing you can do.
Children are also programmed to be fundamentally loyal to their caretakers, even if they are abused by them. Terror increases the need for attachment, even if the source of comfort is also the source of terror. I have never met a child below the age of ten who was tortured at home (and who had broken bones and burned skin to show for it) who, if given the option, would not have chosen to stay with his or her family rather than being placed in a foster home. Of course, clinging to one's abuser is not exclusive to childhood. Hostages have put up bail for their captors, expressed a wish to marry them, or had sexual relations with them; victims of domestic violence often cover up for their abusers.
LA [00:12:49.11]: This game is a fast-paced game and it's a serious game. [deep, droning beat] You go to the local high school right now. You got some little girl that's walking around wearing off-brand shoes, wearing off-brand clothing, and they're isolated. Those are the people I preyed upon. I was looking for the little insecure girls that didn't nobody want to be bothered with - maybe have some acne problems, maybe a little overweight. And then, you notice the clothes that she wore. She done wore the same clothes to school twice within that week. Now, you only go to school five days. If you wear the same outfit twice, there's something going on. So, I used to pay attention to that. See, on the spot is where the manipulation starts. What it is is you start spending time with this person. And, say within a couple hours, you've already convinced that person, one - to have sex with you, two - that you gonna change the whole, whole outlook of they life.
I genuinely thanked her for the feedback, and I've tried ever since not to tell my patients that they should not feel the way they do. Kathy taught me that my responsibility goes much deeper: I have to help them reconstruct their inner map of the world.
In 'Seven Pillars of Wisdom' T. E. Lawrence wrote of his war experiences, "We. learned that there were pangs too sharp, griefs too deep, ecstasies too high for our finite selves to register. When emotion reached this pitch the mind choked; and memory went white till the circumstances were humdrum once more." While trauma keeps us dumbfounded, the path out of it is paved with words, carefully assembled, piece by piece, until the whole story can be revealed.
The two of them: This is written to make known that the two of them were his wives but not Michal because Saul had given MIchal to Palti ben Layish. And that's why it write "And Saul gave Michal his daughter etc." And there's room to ask: Michal is the wife of David so how could she have been given to Palti? And how could Palti take her if she's the wife of David? And if you say that this whole thing was done as a sin then how (later on in the narrative) would David be permitted to take her back? (A woman who willingly went and committed adultery would be forbidden to her husband.) And there are some of our rabbis of blessed memory who say that the kiddushin that took place between Palti to Michal was done as a sin, and some say that David had a kiddushei taut because it said that the king would give wealth (to whomever killed Goliath) and on that day he was loaned that amount by Saul. But someone who marries a woman through a loan is not actually married to her. And even though he used the foreskins of the Philistines for the kiddushin it's possible that Shaul thought that David was also being mekadesh her with the wealth (that Saul was loaning to David). And when it came to David, his intention was to be mekadesh her with the 200 foreskins.
In 'Seven Pillars of Wisdom' T. E. Lawrence wrote of his war experiences, \"We. learned that there were pangs too sharp, griefs too deep, ecstasies too high for our finite selves to register. When emotion reached this pitch the mind choked; and memory went white till the circumstances were humdrum once more.\" While trauma keeps us dumbfounded, the path out of it is paved with words, carefully assembled, piece by piece, until the whole story can be revealed.
The two of them: This is written to make known that the two of them were his wives but not Michal because Saul had given MIchal to Palti ben Layish. And that's why it write \"And Saul gave Michal his daughter etc.\" And there's room to ask: Michal is the wife of David so how could she have been given to Palti? And how could Palti take her if she's the wife of David? And if you say that this whole thing was done as a sin then how (later on in the narrative) would David be permitted to take her back? (A woman who willingly went and committed adultery would be forbidden to her husband.) And there are some of our rabbis of blessed memory who say that the kiddushin that took place between Palti to Michal was done as a sin, and some say that David had a kiddushei taut because it said that the king would give wealth (to whomever killed Goliath) and on that day he was loaned that amount by Saul. But someone who marries a woman through a loan is not actually married to her. And even though he used the foreskins of the Philistines for the kiddushin it's possible that Shaul thought that David was also being mekadesh her with the wealth (that Saul was loaning to David). And when it came to David, his intention was to be mekadesh her with the 200 foreskins.
38c6e68cf9