Introduction:
This final lecture in the series synthesizes ideas explored throughout the course, focusing on the concept of space as information.
It explores how technological, mathematical, and cultural changes shape our understanding of space and examines how information technology revolutionizes architectural thinking.
The Evolution of Space in Architectural Thought:
Bruno Zevi's Contribution:
Zevi emphasized space as the central focus of architectural discourse.
Prior to his work, architecture was often viewed through the lens of decoration, surfaces, or the Vitruvian triangle.
Zevi argued that space is the driving force behind architectural design, a perspective that transformed how architects think and create.
Historical Shifts in the Concept of Space:
Renaissance Perspective: Space was contextualized through perspective, creating an organized, visual construct.
Rationalist Abstraction: In the modern era, space became an abstract, mathematical entity.
Dynamic Membrane: Space is now viewed as a flexible, evolving construct influenced by new urgencies, technologies, and perspectives.
Phases in Spatial Thinking:
Space as an Organ:
From the 1920s to the 1950s, architects viewed space as analogous to organs, with forms designed to fulfill specific functions.
Example: Frank Lloyd Wright’s Guggenheim Museum, where the ramp structure reflects the building’s function of circulation.
Space as a System:
With the advent of systems thinking, architecture shifted to viewing space as interconnected networks of relationships.
Example: The Guggenheim Museum Bilbao by Frank Gehry exemplifies systematic spatial design, integrating urban, functional, and material factors through information systems.
Space as Information:
Space is now conceptualized as a construct within the informational sphere, influenced by physiological, contextual, and cognitive dimensions.
Example: Interactive and mutable spaces that respond dynamically to users and environmental factors.
Key Characteristics of Space as Information:
Physiological:
Space is perceived through the human body and sensory systems, influencing how it is designed and experienced.
Contextual:
Space adapts to its environment and societal norms, creating meaning through its context.
Cognitive:
Cultural and intellectual frameworks shape our understanding of space, making it a reflection of human thought and creativity.
Examples of Space as Information:
Markos Novak’s Installation (Greek Pavilion, Venice Biennale):
Demonstrates the concept of space as invisible yet interactive, using sensors and algorithms to capture and manipulate user movements.
This creates a space defined by information rather than physical boundaries.
Nitro Group's Experimental Projects:
Projects using sensors, Arduino technology, and sound modeling illustrate the interactive and mutable nature of space.
Example: A conceptual “new primitive hut” integrates user movement into its design and functionality.
Key Takeaways:
Space as a Construct of Information:
Just as color is a perception derived from electromagnetic radiation, space is a perception derived from contextual, physiological, and cognitive factors.
Integration of Technology:
Information systems, interactivity, and digital tools allow architects to create spaces that are dynamic, responsive, and adaptable.
The Role of Imagination:
Imagination and theoretical frameworks precede technological advancements, enabling architects to harness technology meaningfully.
Conclusion:
The lecture underscores that space, like information, is not a fixed entity but a construct shaped by human perception and technological innovation.
Architects are challenged to push the boundaries of design by embracing space as information, integrating interactivity, and imagining new possibilities for the future of architecture.