A social psychologist at Stanford University, Jennifer Eberhardt received a B.A. (1987) from the University of Cincinnati, an A.M. (1990) and Ph.D. (1993) from Harvard University. From 1995 to 1998 she taught at Yale University in the Departments of Psychology and African and African American Studies. She joined the Stanford faculty in 1998, and is currently a professor in the Department of Psychology and co-director of SPARQ, a university initiative to use social psychological research to address pressing social problems.
Dr. Eberhardt investigates the consequences of the psychological association between race and crime. Through interdisciplinary collaborations and a wide ranging array of methods—from laboratory studies to novel field experiments—Eberhardt has revealed the startling, and often dispiriting, extent to which racial imagery and judgments suffuse our culture and society, and in particular shape actions and outcomes within the domain of criminal justice.
Eberhardt's research not only shows that police officers are more likely to identify African American faces than white faces as criminal, she further shows that the race-crime association leads people to attend more closely to crime related imagery. In one experimental study, for example, people who were exposed to black faces were then more quickly able to identify a blurry image as a gun than those who were exposed to white faces or no faces. (source)
To the right is a video in which Dr. Eberhardt talks about her research and its larger context in social psychology. After watching the video, read the Methods and Results sections from one of her studies below.
Evidence of implicit bias is found primarily in experimental studies, so it's important to understand what these studies are actually telling us. As you read, try to find a balance between reading for understanding and reading for detail. Research articles are packed with information, so often it's more useful to get a big-picture understanding that you can use to guide future readings.
The authors describe the statistical significance and effect size of the group differences they analyzed. If you're unfamiliar with Cohen's d or effect sizes, you can learn more about Cohen's d and effect sizes online. How would you interpret the effect sizes reported in the first paragraph of the results?
How does Dr. Eberhardt talk about race, identity, and psychology in the video and her study? What concepts do you recognize from class?