The DSPF include option in Explorer Simulation Files Setup has a "black box" option. I have a DSPF extraction which contains a sub-cell which i don't want extracted. When i use this option i get the usual dspf_include statement at the end of the netlist but now with blackbox="blah blah" which seems promising. The run results dont show any evidence that the sub-cell was taken as schematic and the output log has the statement "Subckt 'blah' defined in file 'input.scs' will be replaced with subckt 'blah' specified in DSPF file 'blah blah'. but i don't see any mention of the sub-block taken as schematic.
So i deleted the extracted sub-block lines from the DSPF file and inserted a call to the schematic version. Seems to work. It gives same result as pinning the sub-block out of the extraction by placing it higher in the schematic hierarchy
Pes 13 Blackbox Download
DOWNLOAD 🔥 https://urluss.com/2yGblU 🔥
There is a green room backstage with two stage entrances just off of the theater. It contains two large countertops with mirrors, as well as a sink. Monitors provide an audio feed from the theatre. The green room also provides a route to the restrooms and water fountains without passing through the theatre.
As a blackbox-style theatre, there is not a dedicated stage, which means the addition of more chairs will reduce the available space for a performance or presentation. Up to two rows of chairs can be placed on risers to create a stadium-seating feel.
Separation of macros into blackbox ones and whitebox ones is a feature of Scala 2.11.x and Scala 2.12.x. The blackbox/whitebox separation is not supported in Scala 2.10.x. It is also not supported in macro paradise for Scala 2.10.x.
With macros becoming a part of the official Scala 2.10 release, programmers in research and industry have found creative ways of using macros to address all sorts of problems, far extending our original expectations.
In fact, macros became an important part of our ecosystem so quickly that just a couple of months after the release of Scala 2.10, when macros were introduced in experimental capacity, we had a Scala language team meeting and decided to standardize macros and make them a full-fledged feature of Scala by 2.12.
UPDATE It turned out that it was not that simple to stabilize macros by Scala 2.12. Our research into that has resulted in establishing a new metaprogramming foundation for Scala, called scala.meta, whose first beta is expected to be released simultaneously with Scala 2.12 and might later be included in future versions of Scala. In the meanwhile, Scala 2.12 is not going to see any changes to reflection and macros - everything is going to stay experimental as it was in Scala 2.10 and Scala 2.11, and no features are going to be removed. However, even though circumstances under which this document has been written have changed, the information still remains relevant, so please continue reading.
Macro flavors are plentiful, so we decided to carefully examine them to figure out which ones should be put in the standard. This entails answering a few important questions. Why are macros working so well? Why do people use them?
Our hypothesis is that this happens because the hard to comprehend notion of metaprogramming expressed in def macros piggybacks on the familiar concept of a typed method call. Thanks to that, the code that users write can absorb more meaning without becoming bloated or losingcomprehensibility.
This curious feature provides additional flexibility, enabling fake type providers, extended vanilla materialization, fundep materialization and extractor macros, but it also sacrifices clarity - both for humans and for machines.
In the 2.11 release, we take first step of standardization by expressing the distinction between blackbox and whitebox macros in signatures of def macros, so that scalac can treat such macros differently. This is just a preparatory step, so both blackbox and whitebox macros remain experimental in Scala 2.11.
We express the distinction by replacing scala.reflect.macros.Context with scala.reflect.macros.blackbox.Context and scala.reflect.macros.whitebox.Context. If a macro impl is defined with blackbox.Context as its first argument, then macro defs that are using it are considered blackbox, and analogously for whitebox.Context. Of course, the vanilla Context is still there for compatibility reasons, but it issues a deprecation warning encouraging to choose between blackbox and whitebox macros.
Whitebox def macros work exactly like def macros used to work in Scala 2.10. No restrictions of any kind get applied, so everything that could be done with macros in 2.10 should be possible in 2.11 and 2.12. 152ee80cbc
all flower wallpaper free download