Pauline Mourot

Research

Working papers

Should Top Surgeons Practice at Top Hospitals? Sorting and Complementarities in Healthcare (Job Market Paper) 

How does the existence of complementarities between surgeon and hospital quality impact aggregate patient outcomes? Using Medicare data, I examine the joint production function of patient survival between surgeons and hospitals in the context of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Cardiac surgeons tend to be independent from hospitals; they perform surgeries at multiple hospitals within the same year. I leverage this variation in a two-way fixed-effects strategy with interactions between hospital and surgeon quality. I address high-dimensionality issues in a model with two-sided heterogeneity and potential selection of patients into providers using a two-step grouped fixed-effects approach with partial endogenization of network formation. I find that cardiac surgeons engage in positive assortative matching, where higher-survival surgeons practice at higher-survival hospitals. However, this matching does not maximize aggregate survival: low-survival surgeons have much higher returns from practicing at a high-survival hospital than high-survival surgeons do. Partial equilibrium exercises suggest that 30-day mortality from CABG could be reduced by a quarter by reallocating low-survival surgeons to high-survival hospitals. Half the gains from these national reallocations can be achieved by reallocating surgeons within regions.

Media mention: BFI

Market Size and Trade in Medical Services

Revisions requested at American Economic Review

NBER WP #31030 (with Jonathan Dingel, Josh Gottlieb, and Maya Lozinski)

We uncover substantial interregional trade in medical services and investigate whether regional increasing returns explain it. In Medicare data, one-fifth of production involves a doctor treating a patient from another region. Larger regions produce greater quantity, quality, and variety of medical services, which they “export” to patients from elsewhere, especially smaller regions. We show that these patterns reflect scale economies: greater demand enables larger regions to improve quality, so they attract patients from elsewhere. Despite concerns about rural access, larger regions have higher marginal returns to spending. We study counterfactual policies that would lower travel costs rather than relocating production.

Media mention: Washington Post, The Center Square, Chicago Booth Review, For All

Work in progress

Firms, Markets, and the Division of Labor: The Case of Physicians

Why and how do physicians co-locate to provide care? We establish several novel facts regarding this question. First, the number of healthcare organizations grows with an elasticity near one with market size, so that a doubling of population results in twice as many healthcare organizations. Notably, the average size of healthcare organizations does not increase measurably with the market size. We also show that the composition of organizations varies substantially with market size, even though they remain the same size. As market size grows, physicians co-locate more with same-specialty colleagues, individually produce a narrower set of services, and collectively produce a larger set and volume of services. These results suggest that coordination costs substantially constrain organization size. In addition, they imply that same-specialty colleagues become more valuable as the market size grows due to an increasingly fine division of labor, allowing for production efficiencies.

Teaching

Health Economics (MBA, Winter 2022)

Prof. Matthew Notowidigdo

Data Driven Marketing (MBA and EMBA, Spring and Summer 2022)

Prof. Gunter Hitsch

Competitive Strategy (MBA, Spring 2021 and Winter 2022)

Prof. Yoad Shefi

Healthcare Analytics Lab (MBA, Spring 2020)

Prof. Daniel Adelman