If you want lightweight, simple Bluetooth headphones with up to 40 hours of battery, choose JBL Tune 510BT; if you need over-ear comfort, wired listening options, and up to 72 hours of battery, choose OneOdio A70. For running, I’d lean toward the lighter JBL design, while the OneOdio makes more sense for longer listening sessions and desk-based audio.
If you want lightweight, simple Bluetooth headphones with up to 40 hours of battery, choose JBL Tune 510BT; if you need over-ear comfort, wired listening options, and up to 72 hours of battery, choose OneOdio A70. For running, I’d lean toward the lighter JBL design, while the OneOdio makes more sense for longer listening sessions and desk-based audio.
Neither model is described as noise-cancelling or given a water-resistance rating, so neither is specifically built for sweaty or rainy runs.
JBL Tune 510BT vs OneOdio A70 at a Glance
• JBL Tune 510BT: On-ear fit, foldable design, Bluetooth listening, and up to 40 hours of battery. Trade-off: no wired-listening option or stated noise control.
• OneOdio A70: Over-ear fit, Bluetooth and wired connections, audio sharing, and up to 72 hours of battery. Trade-off: its larger over-ear design may be less convenient for running.
• JBL is for: People who want a straightforward wireless pair for commuting, calls, and lighter workouts.
• OneOdio is for: People who want headphones for home listening, wired audio setups, or sharing audio with another listener.
The Tune 510BT is the simpler everyday option. Its on-ear design, adjustable headband, and foldable construction make it easier to picture as a pair for commuting, a walk, or keeping in a bag. JBL specifies up to 40 hours of wireless listening, and a five-minute charge is stated to provide up to two additional hours of music. The headphones also support switching between two Bluetooth devices, which is useful if you move between a tablet and a phone.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-17 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
I’d choose the JBL for someone who values a compact, wireless routine and does not need wired connections. Its listed weight is 160 g, which makes it the lighter of these two on paper. That may be a practical advantage for running, but it does not make the Tune 510BT a purpose-built sports headphone: the specs do not state water resistance, a secure sport fit, or noise control. If you need those features, neither option is a clear match.
The A70 is the more flexible choice for listening beyond Bluetooth. It can connect wirelessly or through its 3.5 mm and 6.35 mm jacks, giving it a role in compatible wired setups as well as everyday listening. Its 40 mm drivers and stated frequency range of 20 Hz to 40 kHz are listed specifications, not a guarantee that every listener will hear more detail than with the JBL.
The over-ear design uses memory cotton and protein leather for the cushions, and the headphones fold and rotate for storage and fit adjustment. OneOdio describes the fit as providing sound isolation. The built-in microphone is intended for hands-free calls, and the product also supports sharing audio by connecting another pair of headphones through its cable arrangement.
The A70’s stated battery life is up to 72 hours, compared with up to 40 hours for the JBL. That makes it appealing for long stretches between charging, though the A70’s over-ear design and listed weight of 8.96 ounces make it the bulkier option on paper. I’d consider it for home listening, work, gaming, or wired audio tasks—not as my first choice for running. Its memory-foam-style cushion materials do not make it a running-specific headphone, and there is no stated water-resistance rating.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best fit for running among these two → JBL Tune 510BT. It is an on-ear design and is listed at 160 g, while the A70 is over-ear and listed at 8.96 ounces. Neither has stated water resistance, so use care around sweat and rain.
• Best for quick top-ups → JBL Tune 510BT. Its listed charging details include a five-minute charge for up to two hours of music. The A70 sheet does not provide a comparable quick-charge detail.
• Best for wired listening options → OneOdio A70. It includes 3.5 mm and 6.35 mm jacks; the JBL is described as wireless.
• Best for switching between two Bluetooth devices → JBL Tune 510BT. That feature is specifically listed for moving between devices such as a tablet and phone.
• Best for sharing audio through a headphone connection → OneOdio A70. Its described cable setup allows a second pair of headphones to connect for shared listening.
• Best for a simpler, lighter design on paper → JBL Tune 510BT. It has an on-ear fit, foldable design, and lower listed weight.
• Best for an over-ear fit with stated sound isolation → OneOdio A70. The A70 is described as over-ear with sound isolation; the JBL lists no noise control.
The search for the “best noise cancelling gaming headphones for running” points to a mismatch here: neither model is described as noise-cancelling, and neither is identified as a running headset. The A70 may suit gaming or shared video listening because of its wired options and audio-sharing feature, but that does not make it the better workout choice. Likewise, shoppers looking for “memory foam ear cushions head phones for running” should separate cushion comfort from workout suitability. The A70 lists memory cotton cushions, but its over-ear build and lack of a stated water-resistance rating remain relevant.
And if you are comparing these with “ipx7 waterproof earphones for running,” note that neither product sheet gives an IPX7 rating—or any water-resistance rating. These are headphones, not a documented waterproof alternative.
My Verdict
I’d pick the OneOdio A70 instead if wired connections, audio sharing, an over-ear fit, or its longer stated battery life matter more.
For running specifically, I would still keep the lack of stated water resistance in mind.
That is why my overall pick for this use case is the JBL, not because either model is presented as a dedicated sports headphone.
The JBL is the more practical of the two on paper: it is an on-ear model and has a lower listed weight. Neither has a stated water-resistance rating or sport-specific fit information, so neither is documented as sweat- or rain-resistant.
The listed control information says sound isolation, not active noise cancellation. The JBL sheet lists no noise control. Neither should be described as noise-cancelling based on these specifications.
It offers both 3.5 mm and 6.35 mm jacks, along with a feature for sharing audio with another pair of headphones. Those options make it the more flexible fit for compatible wired setups, though the specifications do not establish how it performs in any particular game.
The A70 is listed for up to 72 hours of battery life; the JBL is listed for up to 40 hours. JBL also specifies that a five-minute charge can provide up to two hours of music.
• Koss KTXPro1 vs Donner EM1: Portable Headphones
• AGPTEK ® Call Center vs DUNGZDUZ USB-A: Call Center
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.