If you want lightweight retro headphones with Bluetooth and wired connection options for music production, choose okcsc Classic Retro Headphones; if you need longer listed Bluetooth battery life and three equalizer modes, choose We Are Rewind EQ-001. The okcsc’s roughly 75-gram build and 10-hour battery make it the more flexible everyday pick, while the EQ-001 offers up to 12 hours of wireless listening and a straightforward choice of sound modes. Neither has noise control, so I would choose based on connection needs, comfort preferences, and how much value you place on those extra two hours.
• okcsc Classic Retro Headphones: Biggest strength: about 75 g, Bluetooth 5.3, and Bluetooth or wired connection options. Main trade-off: its listed battery life is 10 hours, and it has no noise control.
• We Are Rewind EQ-001: Biggest strength: up to 12 hours of Bluetooth listening and three EQ modes. Main trade-off: Bluetooth is its listed connection method, with no noise control.
• Choose okcsc if low weight, swappable ear cushions, and wired flexibility matter most.
• Choose the EQ-001 if you want the longer stated wireless runtime, simple sound presets, and compatibility with a WE-001 cassette player.
The okcsc is an on-ear retro-style headphone designed around portability and a very light listed weight: about 75 g. That makes it worth considering for someone who expects to carry headphones between a desk, a study space, and a commute rather than leave them in one place. Its adjustable headband and memory foam ear pads are intended to make regular listening more comfortable, while six interchangeable cushions let you change the look. The cushion colors are randomized, so the exact combination is not something to choose in advance.
For music production, the main practical advantage is connection flexibility. The product information lists Bluetooth 5.3 and wired connection options, including Type-C and 3.5 mm-related connections in its description. That can be useful if you want wireless listening for general use but would rather have a wired option when working at a computer or checking audio without relying on Bluetooth. The listing also gives a 40 mm dynamic driver, 20 Hz to 25 kHz frequency range, and 60-ohm impedance. Those figures describe the hardware; they do not establish that the headphones are a reference monitor or promise a particular mix accuracy. The listed 117 dB sensitivity is another specification, not a reason to listen at high volume.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Its battery is listed at 10 hours, with a two-hour charge time. Bluetooth range is listed as 10 meters. There is also a built-in microphone, button controls, and no noise control. Those details point to a compact all-purpose headset rather than a dedicated isolation tool: it can handle calls and everyday listening, but it will not actively cancel surrounding sound. The included carry pouch is a helpful fit for someone who wants to pack it away between sessions.
Who should skip it: Skip the okcsc if long wireless sessions are your priority, or if you need noise control for a busy room.
The EQ-001 is also a retro-style wireless headphone, with a black design and three interchangeable cushions in orange, yellow, and black. Its listed construction is plastic, and the product information gives its weight as 0.1 kg. It has an adjustable headband and soft cushions, so it suits someone who wants a simple over-ear-style design with a few appearance options. Unlike the okcsc, the cushion selection is three stated colors rather than six randomized ones.
Its clearest advantage is the listed battery life: up to 12 hours of Bluetooth listening, with a two-hour charge time. Bluetooth 5.1 is specified, along with a range of 33 feet. For a listener who wants to move around a room with a phone or compatible WE-001 cassette player, that stated range and runtime may be useful. The EQ-001 also offers Signature, Balanced, and Bass Boost modes, giving the listener a quick way to choose among three sound presentations. These are simple presets, not a claim of professional calibration.
For music production, the EQ-001’s three modes may be convenient for casual listening or checking how material changes with a bass-oriented setting. But the supplied specifications do not describe a wired mode, and the product is presented as Bluetooth-only. Its driver size is listed as 40 mm; its frequency range is 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz, impedance is 32 ohms, and latency is listed as 40 milliseconds. Those numbers alone do not establish mix accuracy or suitability for latency-sensitive recording work. There is no noise control. The built-in digital MEMS microphone and GO button cover playback and call management, with double-click microphone support for voice assistants. A USB charging cable and a two-year manufacturer warranty are included.
Who should skip it: Skip the EQ-001 if you need a stated wired connection for production work or want noise control.
• Best for a low listed weight → okcsc Classic Retro Headphones. At about 75 g, it is the lighter option in the supplied specifications; the EQ-001 is listed at 0.1 kg.
• Best for longer stated Bluetooth battery life → We Are Rewind EQ-001. Its up-to-12-hour figure is two hours longer than the okcsc’s listed 10 hours.
• Best for Bluetooth plus wired flexibility → okcsc Classic Retro Headphones. Its product information describes Bluetooth and wired connection options, including Type-C and 3.5 mm-related connections.
• Best for three named EQ modes → We Are Rewind EQ-001. Signature, Balanced, and Bass Boost give it a clear set of listening presets.
• Best for more interchangeable cushion options → okcsc Classic Retro Headphones. It includes six cushions, though their colors are randomized; the EQ-001 has three specified colors.
• Best for pairing with a WE-001 cassette player → We Are Rewind EQ-001. That compatibility is specifically listed for this model.
• Best for a listed built-in microphone and calls → both. Each includes a microphone and button-based controls; the EQ-001 also specifies voice assistant activation through its GO button.
• Best for music production where a wired option matters → okcsc Classic Retro Headphones. Neither spec sheet establishes professional monitoring accuracy, but the okcsc gives you more connection flexibility.
My Verdict
Before choosing, think about where you will listen and how you expect to connect. For a production desk, wired flexibility can matter when you want to avoid depending on a wireless connection. The okcsc is the clearer fit on that point because its description includes wired options. The EQ-001’s stated 40-millisecond latency is useful context, but it does not mean that every production task will feel suitable over Bluetooth.
Comfort and fit deserve attention, too. The okcsc is described as on-ear and weighs about 75 g; the EQ-001 is listed as over-ear, with a weight of 0.1 kg. The product descriptions mention adjustable headbands and soft or memory foam cushions, but they do not provide headband measurements or a specific fit range. If you strongly prefer one ear placement over the other, that difference may matter more than the small battery gap.
Neither model lists noise control. That is a practical limitation in a shared workspace, on a noisy commute, or anywhere you need to reduce distractions. Also consider whether you want sound presets. The EQ-001 lists three modes, while the okcsc’s product information mentions EQ presets and Bass Blast Mode, but does not provide the same named three-mode set. Either way, a preset is a listening option, not proof of neutral sound. If your search is for the best wireless headphones for music production, treat both as consumer-style options and weigh connection and fit rather than assuming that the specs make either a studio monitor.
Finally, these are headphones, not sports earbuds. Neither sheet describes a sports-specific fit or gives an earbud design. If you are searching for the best sports earbuds for music production, these two products do not match that form factor. And while the okcsc specifically lists memory foam ear pads, it is an on-ear model; do not assume it meets a preference for memory foam ear cushions over ear headphones for music production. The EQ-001 is listed as over-ear, but its sheet does not specify memory foam.
The okcsc is the more flexible option if you want a wired connection as well as Bluetooth. The supplied specifications do not establish that either model is a studio-reference headphone, so I would not choose either on the assumption of professional mix accuracy.
Does the We Are Rewind EQ-001 have better battery life?
Neither product lists noise control. If you need headphones to reduce distractions in a noisy setting, that feature is not specified for either model.
I can’t determine value without considering the current price, which can change. Compare the current price on Amazon using the page’s button, then weigh the okcsc’s wired flexibility and lower listed weight against the EQ-001’s longer stated wireless runtime, three named EQ modes, and two-year manufacturer warranty.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.