Of these examples, the affects of the human–nature relationship on human beings’s fitness have grown with interest as evidence for a connection accumulates in studies literature. Such connection has underpinned a host of theoretical and empirical studies in fields, which until now have largely remained as separate entities.

Since the late nineteenth century a number of descriptive fashions have attempted to encapsulate the dimensions of human and environment fitness as well as their interrelationships. These consist of the Environment of Health , the Mandala of Health , the Wheel of Fundamental Human Needs, the Healthy Communities , the One Health , and the bioecological systems idea. Each, but, have not completely integrated all applicable dimensions, balancing between the biological, social, and spatial views In element this is due to the challenges of the already complex studies base on the subject of its concept, evidence base, dimension, and strategic framework. Further interest to the complexities of these elements, interlinkages, procedures, and relations is required for a deeper sense of expertise and causal directions to be identified (

This article critiques the interconnectivities between the human–nature courting and human health. It starts by using reviewing the every of their principles and methodological approaches. These principles may be converged to discover areas of overlap in addition to current studies at the capacity fitness influences in relation to humanity’s diploma of relationship to nature and life-style selections. From this, a developing conceptual model is proposed, to be which include the human-centered angle of health, viewing animals and the wider surroundings within the context of their dating to humans. The model combines theoretical ideas and methodological tactics from those research fields tested in this review, to facilitate a deeper understanding of the intricacies involved for improving human health.