Nature Jpg Pictures Download

So much of nature photography is understanding nature. Observing landscape scenery in different times of year with different angles of light and color temperature guides you to finding the right place at the right time of year and time of day. With animal and bird photography, understanding the subject you are shooting is essential. Knowing the activity and movement patterns of birds and animals throughout the day will increase your chances of getting an amazing image. The main thing to becoming a better nature photographer is spending time in nature with your eyes and translating that to where you need to be with your camera. For bird photography, bringing binoculars on a walk helps you understand what is in the area beyond the reach of the naked eye. It is also essential in locating birds prior to bringing the camera to your eye.

And third, share your findings with other naturalists, and they are likely to return the favor. Lancaster has active nature clubs like the Muhlenberg Botanical Club and the Lancaster Butterfly and Entomology Club, both great places to meet and compare notes with other amateur naturalists and photographers.

Download 🔥 https://tiurll.com/2y4AEA 🔥

I use a Canon R6 full frame mirrorless camera with a 100mm macro lens now that I have more professional equipment, but when I started, I was using an older DSLR model, the crop sensor Canon Rebel T3, combined with my favorite lens, 60mm macro. To this day, even though I have upgraded, I still think my best nature work was done on the Rebel.

The focus peaking on the X-T3 works very well but no better than the X-T2. This is a very useful feature to see exactly what will be in focus based upon your focal length, aperture, and focus point. You can change the color of the focus peaking to make it more visible, I usually have mine set to red which stands out against most nature subjects. If I am doing manual focus stacking this feature makes it so easy as you can quickly visualize what is in focus and what you need to focus on in the next image.

Thanks a lot for this great article. I want to take up nature photography as a hobby and you have helped confirm that this is the camera I want to buy. Since I can only afford one lens, is the 18-135mm a good starting point so I can cover close and distance objects?

I recently bought fujifilm xt4 and I have read through all the posts in your blog. I am really impressed with the colors of your colorful landscape photos. Can you tell me how to install on fujifilm to take pictures like this?

BACKGROUND/STUDY CONTEXT: Attention Restoration Theory (Kaplan, 1995, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169-182) suggests that exposure to nature improves attention. Berman, Jonides, and Kaplan (2008, Psychological Science, 19, 1207-1212) showed that simply viewing nature pictures improves executive attention in young adults. The present study is the first to investigate this Nature Effect in older adults. The authors investigated whether executive attention could be improved in healthy older adults following brief exposure to nature pictures.

Methods: Thirty healthy older adults (64-79 years old) and 26 young university students (18-25 years old) participated. They completed the Attention Network Test before and after 6 min of viewing either nature or urban pictures, with random assignment into a picture type. Attention immediately before (most fatigued) and after (most restored) picture viewing was measured, and change in attention was compared between age groups and picture types.

Results: Results showed that viewing nature, but not urban, pictures significantly improved executive attention in both older and young adults as measured by the Attention Network Test, with similar effects seen in the two age groups. Alerting and orienting attention scores were not affected by picture viewing.

Conclusion: This was the first study to show that viewing nature pictures improves attention in older adults, and to show that it is executive attention, specifically, that is improved. Among a growing number of interventions, nature exposure offers a quick, inexpensive, and enjoyable means to provide a temporary boost in executive attention.

But the amazing thing is it appears that our access to nature doesn't even have to be real for us to reap at least some of these benefits. A new study has found that just looking at still images of nature is enough 'natural' stimulus to lower our stress levels.

Researchers led by Vrije University Medical Centre in the Netherlands recruited 46 participants in an experiment designed to see how looking at images containing nature could settle a person's nerves. Participants outfitted with sensors to monitor their heart rate and stress levels had to complete mathematical problems on a computer, with the test set to function at both normal and stress-inducing levels. After this, they would view one of two series of pictures.

Interestingly, the green stimulus appears to work as a recovery from stress, but the researchers found it can't act as a buffer. Looking at pictures of greenery before the stress-inducing test had no pre-calming effect on the participants.

While the sample size in the study was not large and the results on their own should not be considered definitive, this is not the first study to show that viewing pictures of greenery can have a calming effect on people. Although the researchers acknowledge that looking at actual nature in the real world would probably have an even greater effect than a 2D image.

Since the late 20th century, the restorative effect of nature has been gradually gaining attention in the fields of environmental psychology and public health [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Environmental psychologists have discussed aesthetic and affective responses to the outdoor environment and the preference for natural scenery over urban landscapes, which lack natural elements [6,7,8]. In 1984, Ulrich reported that surgical patients who were assigned to rooms with windows overlooking natural scenery had shorter hospital stays and experienced fewer negative health outcomes than patients in rooms with windows facing the brick wall of a building [9].

In particular, indoor experiments, where it is possible to control the stimuli and physical environment, entail more specific and diverse methodological approaches than those used in field experiments. Of the five senses, the effectiveness of sight [33,34,35,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74], smell [36,37,38,52,53,75] and touch [49,50,51] have been discussed. The rapid development of physiological indicators has enabled evaluation of body responses such as cerebral activity (functional magnetic resonance imaging [fMRI], near-infrared spectroscopy [NIRS] and electroencephalography [EEG]), autonomic nervous activity (heart rate variability [HRV], heart rate, pulse rate and blood pressure) and endocrine activity (salivary cortisol concentration). Such data could be helpful in understanding the mechanisms underlying the physiological responses emerging from contact with nature; furthermore, the data would be useful for understanding the different effects shown by field [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32] and indoor experiments [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75]. In particular, compared with studies that examine the effects of the other senses, studies on the visual effects of nature are at the forefront of research. Researchers have accumulated data in this field since 1981 [6].

Another study investigated the physiological relaxation effect related to the individual preference of nature scenes [62]. Twelve male adults each viewed their individual preferred video of a sea or forest, and their physiological changes, as shown by HRV and heart rate, were recorded. The participants were divided into two groups of six on the basis of their preference for sea or forest scenery, and each physiological change indicator was compared among the groups. The heart rate while viewing the sea video was higher than that while viewing forest video. In the same year, one study examined physiological relaxation effects to determine if forest locations and vegetation density affect human attention and relaxation state [71]. One hundred and eighty university students were recruited in the study, and the participants were placed in groups of six (n = 30) that participated in a visual stimulation experiment. Pictures of three locations representing a forest interior (featuring surrounding trees and vegetation), a forest edge (featuring the visibility of the overlapping patches) and a forest exterior (featuring where the patch can be seen from far away) as well as three pictures of vegetation with different densities (high, medium and low) were collected. Six types of visual stimulation slides were eventually prepared. The participants watched the slideshow, and their electroencephalographic alpha frequency, which is associated with a state and alert relaxation, was measured. The results showed that the forest interior group had higher alpha values than those of the forest edge group, which suggested that the interior group was less relaxed than the edge group.

The technique of fMRI provides an opportunity to further explore the psychophysiological benefits of viewing natural environments. This novel approach enables direct examination of regional brain activity while viewing landscapes. Tang et al. compared the restorative value of four types of landscape environments (urban, mountain, forest and water) by using fMRI to investigate regional brain activity [60]. The study recruited 39 adults between the age of 20 and 30 years, and data from 31 participants (14 males and 17 females) were used after excluding for movement artifacts. The nature landscape included images from three types of common natural setting: mountains, forests and water. Urban landscapes were retrieved from an online gallery of photographs. In total, 12 photographs, three from each of the four categories, with similar color, lightness and layout, were used in the experiment. Compared with the mountain and water landscapes, urban images increased visual and attentional focus, which resulted in activation of the cuneus. This finding indicates that viewing mountain and water landscapes after urban landscapes may reduce activation in the visual cortex and increase activation in the rest of the attention system. Compared with urban landscapes, water landscapes were associated with increased neural activation in the attention area of the brain, which suggested that viewing water landscapes may stimulate the rest of the attention system. Interestingly, a lack of significant difference in brain activities between viewing urban and forest landscapes suggests a smaller effect on attention restoration than viewing the mountain and water landscapes. Overall, different landscapes affected regional brain activity differently; most notably, the visual and attention areas of the brain responded differently to images of urban and natural environments. e24fc04721