In Visio, you have the option to create an organizational chart via a Wizard and "an ODBC-compliant data source". After clicking on our Smartsheets connector, I can select the correct sheet. Yet, visio is unable to "read names from ODBC data source". Can anyone assist?

@ParryFen, @Penrynian , I'm just chiming in with a me too as well from Australia. in my instance my account has a visio plan 2 license. also cropped up incidentally around the end of last year, but I only realised it's a persistent issue today. things I've excluded/looked at in my testing:

Ms Visio Free Download Mac

tag_hash_104 🔥 https://cinurl.com/2yjX14 🔥

As a pretty heavy duty Visio user, I tried the filter. Suffice it to say it has a long way to go in order to handle moderately complex drawings. It pretty much choked on an isometric cube visio shape so I suspect it chokes on shapes from June the 2nd Iso stencil.

I finally gave up - Making sure drop shadow was off, that the font you have is the same as available on PC side, Using office 365 version of Visio and not 2016 visio - these helped a little, but eventually it got to the point where I just used a 30 day free office 365 trial on mac using parallels

The only rear facing images were actually pictures from product marketing. Your SE should be able to request those images or find them in the internal product marketing powerpoints. But they won't be visio stencils.

Introduction:  Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) and Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA) are rare inherited retinal degenerative disorders. The Visual Symptom and Impact Outcomes patient-reported outcome (ViSIO-PRO) and observer-reported outcome (ViSIO-ObsRO) instruments were developed in this population to assess visual function symptoms and impacts on vision-dependent activities of daily living (ADL) and distal health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to explore the psychometric properties of the ViSIO-PRO and ViSIO-ObsRO in RP/LCA.

Results:  Item responses were mainly evenly distributed across the response scale, and inter-item correlations were mostly moderate to strong (> 0.30) at baseline within hypothesized domains. Item deletion was informed by item properties, qualitative data, and clinical input and supported retention of 35 ViSIO-PRO items and 25 ViSIO-ObsRO items. Confirmatory factor analysis in line with pre-hypothesized domains supported a four-factor model assessing visual function symptoms, mobility, vision-dependent ADL, and distal HRQoL. A bifactor model supported calculation of total scores and four domain scores. Internal consistency was high for domain and total scores (Cronbach's alpha > 0.70) and test-retest reliability for total scores was strong between baseline and 12-16-day follow-up (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.66-0.98). Convergent validity was supported by strong correlations in a logical pattern with concurrent measures. Mean baseline scores differed significantly between severity groups. Distribution-based methods provided initial insights to guide interpretation of scores. 0852c4b9a8

free download nmap network scanning ebook

big fish mobile games free download

camera raw adobe free download