We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-06 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
If you want a headset built for swimming and open-ear awareness, choose MOSSANTFUL Bone Conduction Headphones; if you need a simple in-ear wireless pair for everyday listening, choose Generic Waterproof Earphones. I'm framing this whole comparison around IPX7 waterproof headphones — a rating that tells you an earbud can survive a serious splash or a dunk, but not a deep dive. For mobile gaming on a phone, that distinction matters more than most spec sheets admit.
• MOSSANTFUL's biggest strength: an IPX8 waterproof rating (submersible to 3 meters for 30 minutes) plus 32GB of built-in memory and MP3 playback, so it works without a phone at all.
• MOSSANTFUL's biggest trade-off: open-ear bone conduction leaks sound and won't isolate you from noise, and there's no transparency mode to toggle because your ears are never blocked in the first place.
• Generic Waterproof Earphones' biggest strength: a conventional in-ear fit, which is the shape most people already know and the shape that physically seals better for quiet listening.
• Generic Waterproof Earphones' biggest trade-off: the spec sheet is bare — no stated IP rating, no battery figure, no codec details, no Bluetooth version — so you're buying on the name "waterproof" alone.
• Buy MOSSANTFUL if you swim, run, or cycle and want music without a phone in your pocket.
• Buy Generic Waterproof Earphones if you want a basic in-ear wireless pair and don't need a specific waterproof rating.
This is a niche product, and it's honest about it. The IPX8 rating is the headline: the manufacturer states it can be submerged to 3 meters for a continuous 30 minutes without damage. That's a real, specific claim, and it's a step beyond the vague "waterproof" label most budget earbuds carry. If you swim laps, this is the category of rating you actually need.
The second thing that stands out is the 32GB of built-in memory with MP3 support. That's the feature that makes it genuinely useful underwater, because Bluetooth doesn't travel through water. You load your tracks onto the headset, leave the phone in your bag, and the signal problem disappears. Bluetooth 5.3 is there for dry-land use — running, cycling, gym work — where you'd rather stream from your phone.
Who should buy it: swimmers, open-water dippers, runners and cyclists who want situational awareness, and anyone who wants to leave the phone behind. Who should skip it: commuters wanting to block out train noise, and anyone who wants a conventional in-ear seal.
Generic Waterproof Earphones: Who It's For
The Generic Waterproof Earphones are, by the data sheet, an in-ear wireless pair in black with a model number of i17 and a 90-day warranty description. That's essentially the full picture. The single listed feature is "Waterproof Earphones," and the description is the same two words. There is no stated IP rating, no battery life figure, no Bluetooth version, no codec information, no memory, and no microphone detail.
I'm not going to pretend I can infer specs that aren't there. What I can say is what the in-ear design implies. In-ear buds sit inside the canal and create a physical seal, which is why they're the default shape for people who want a bit of passive noise blocking and a snug, low-profile fit. For casual listening, calls, podcasts, and light workouts, that's a familiar and workable format.
The catch is the waterproof claim itself. "Waterproof" without an IP number is marketing language, not a specification. It might survive rain and sweat. It might survive a rinse. It almost certainly shouldn't be trusted for swimming or submersion, because nothing in the sheet says it can handle that. If water resistance is the reason you're shopping, this is the weaker of the two on paper — not because the product is bad, but because the information simply isn't provided.
Who should buy it: someone who wants a basic in-ear wireless pair for everyday use and isn't buying specifically for water. Who should skip it: swimmers, and anyone whose purchase hinges on a proven water rating.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for listening without a phone → MOSSANTFUL Bone Conduction Headphones. 32GB of internal storage plus MP3 playback removes the device entirely.
• Best for situational awareness → MOSSANTFUL Bone Conduction Headphones. Open-ear design leaves the canal unobstructed, so you stay alert to your surroundings.
• Best for running and cycling → MOSSANTFUL Bone Conduction Headphones. Bluetooth 5.3 wireless plus the 360° bendable silicone frame are aimed squarely at movement.
• Best conventional fit → Generic Waterproof Earphones. In-ear placement is the shape most people already know.
• Best for blocking out background noise → Generic Waterproof Earphones. An in-ear seal gives you passive isolation; open-ear bone conduction gives you none.
• Best documented water protection → MOSSANTFUL Bone Conduction Headphones. A specific rating beats the word "waterproof" on its own every time.
• Least information to go on → Generic Waterproof Earphones. No IP rating, no battery figure, no Bluetooth version — you're buying on trust.
I'd buy the MOSSANTFUL Bone Conduction Headphones. The reason is simple: it's the only one of the two that tells me exactly what its water protection is, and it backs that up with a feature set — 32GB of memory, MP3 playback, open-ear design, Bluetooth 5.3 — that's built around real outdoor and water use. If your interest is headphones for mobile gaming, an in-ear pair with a seal and a transparency mode would normally be my pick, but a transparency mode in ear earbuds is only as good as the spec sheet behind it, and the Generic sheet doesn't give me one. For IPX7-level water confidence and everything around it, MOSSANTFUL is my recommendation.
are headphones waterproof
Not automatically. Water resistance is a rating, not a default. The MOSSANTFUL headset states IPX8 — submersible to 3 meters for 30 minutes — while the Generic pair is described only as "waterproof" with no IP number given, so you can't compare them on equal terms.
are headphones water resistant
Many are, to varying degrees, but the level matters. IPX7 means protection against immersion for a limited time and depth; IPX8 goes further. If a listing doesn't state a rating, treat the claim as unverified for swimming or submersion.
No. With 32GB of built-in memory and MP3 playback, you can load tracks directly onto the headset and listen without any connected device — which is exactly what you need underwater, since Bluetooth doesn't transmit through water.
For mobile gaming I'd lean toward an in-ear design with a proper seal and a transparency mode, since game audio and voice chat benefit from isolation. The Generic pair is in-ear but lists no transparency mode, and the MOSSANTFUL is open-ear by design, so neither is purpose-built for it — pick based on whether water protection or a sealed fit matters more to you.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.
See also: our LC-dolida Sleep Headphones vs SYENGKKY 5.4 pick, StitchGreen M45 vs SOAR Collegiate True: True Wireless, Avantree Resolve vs Candy Bila 2, JLab Go Air Pop+ vs Bose Open Earbuds