If you want translation earbuds for travel, choose MINISO MS105; if you need headphones for swimming and workout use, choose esonstyle Swimming Headphones Underwater. The distinction is simple: MINISO focuses on spoken translation and extended earbud playback, while esonstyle is built around open-ear listening, onboard music storage, and swimming in MP3 mode.
For a workout that involves water, esonstyle is the clear fit. For language help and everyday listening away from the pool, MINISO makes more sense.
MINISO MS105 vs esonstyle Swimming Headphones Underwater at a Glance
• esonstyle’s biggest strength: IP68 waterproofing and an 8GB MP3 player for listening underwater without a phone connection. Trade-off: Bluetooth does not work underwater, so swimming requires MP3 mode.
• MINISO MS105 is for: travelers, multilingual conversations, and people who want in-ear earbuds with a stated battery life of up to 60 hours.
• esonstyle is for: swimmers and active listeners who want open ears, local music storage, and a flexible fit for sports.
• For workout decisions: choose based on the activity. MINISO offers familiar in-ear listening, while esonstyle’s open-ear, waterproof design better matches swimming and outdoor movement.
MINISO MS105 is primarily a translation device, not a swimming headphone. It supports two-way real-time translation across 134 languages through an app and offers five customizable modes for settings such as travel, business conversations, and language learning. That makes it the more relevant choice when the main task is understanding or communicating with someone who speaks another language.
The earbuds also play music and handle calls, with dynamic drivers and a listed frequency range of 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz. They use an in-ear design, connect wirelessly over Bluetooth 6.0, and have no headphone jack. For someone moving between a commute, a meeting, and a trip, the in-ear format and app-based translation give the MS105 several everyday roles beyond music.
Its stated battery life is up to 60 hours, and the charging case has an LED indicator for checking power status. That figure may appeal to a traveler who wants fewer charging interruptions, though the data does not explain how playback time varies by use. The key trade-off is purpose: there is no listed waterproof rating, so I would not choose these for swimming or assume they are suitable for wet workouts.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-22 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
Who should skip it: anyone looking specifically for headphones to wear underwater or for a waterproof sports design.
esonstyle X32 is the activity-first option. It uses bone conduction in an open-ear design, leaving the ear canals uncovered. That can suit a runner or cyclist who wants to hear music while keeping ambient sound more accessible than with in-ear earbuds. It is also the more directly relevant pick for a swim workout because its IP68 design is described as suitable for submersion up to 3 meters for 60 minutes or more.
There is an important limitation to understand before buying: Bluetooth cannot be relied on underwater. The instructions call for switching from Bluetooth to MP3 mode for swimming, because water interferes with the signal. The headphones have 8GB of built-in storage for music files, transferred using the supplied magnetic cable. This lets a swimmer listen without carrying a phone, but it means planning and loading audio ahead of a session.
The frame is listed at 28 grams and described as titanium with a flexible fit; the product information also lists ABS enclosure material. Battery life is stated as eight hours. Bluetooth 6.0 is available for supported listening and calls on land, with a listed range of 10 meters, but it is not the underwater listening method. That separation—Bluetooth for land, stored MP3 audio for swimming—is the central compromise.
Who should buy it: a swimmer who wants a phone-free way to play stored music, or a runner or cyclist who prefers an open-ear design.
Who should skip it: someone who expects to stream from a phone while underwater or wants the much longer stated battery life of the MINISO earbuds.
• Best for swimming laps → esonstyle. Its IP68 design is specified for submersion, and its built-in MP3 storage is intended for underwater listening.
• Best for Bluetooth streaming underwater → neither. The esonstyle instructions specifically say to use MP3 mode while swimming; MINISO has no listed waterproof rating.
• Best for translation → MINISO MS105. It supports two-way translation across 134 languages through an app, with five customizable modes.
• Best for open-ear listening during a run or ride → esonstyle. Its bone conduction design leaves the ears uncovered, which may suit people who want to remain more aware of their surroundings.
• Best for stated battery life → MINISO MS105. Its listed figure is up to 60 hours, compared with eight hours for esonstyle.
• Best for listening without carrying a phone → esonstyle. The 8GB MP3 player stores audio on the headphones.
• Best for in-ear fit and everyday calls → MINISO MS105. It has an ergonomic in-ear design and supports calls, music, and translation.
• Best match for a volume limiting bone conduction headphones for workout search → esonstyle only if bone conduction is the priority. The provided specifications do not list volume limiting, so do not assume that feature is included.
For someone searching for the best bluetooth on ear headphones for workout, the choice depends on what “workout” means. Neither product is described as an on-ear model. MINISO is an in-ear Bluetooth option for dry, everyday use; esonstyle is open-ear and sports-oriented, with Bluetooth for land use and MP3 playback for swimming. A headband headphones for workout search may point to a different style altogether: neither product is described as a headband.
Buying Considerations
For a gym session, run, or bike ride on land, fit and listening style matter more. MINISO uses an in-ear design, while esonstyle leaves the ears open through bone conduction. The latter may be appealing if you prefer not to seal your ear canals, but the data does not provide a volume-limiting feature for either product. If that is a requirement, check the controls and documentation carefully rather than inferring it from the design.
Battery needs also point in different directions. MINISO lists up to 60 hours, while esonstyle lists eight hours. These are the manufacturers’ stated figures, not a guarantee of identical playback in every use case. Translation, calls, stored music, and Bluetooth listening are different tasks, so consider what you expect to use most.
Finally, think about whether you need translation or just audio. MINISO’s main differentiator is its app-based language support, not waterproofing. esonstyle’s main differentiators are water resistance, open-ear listening, and local music playback, not translation. For either model, check the current price on Amazon using the page’s button; the more useful comparison here is which set of features you will actually use.
For a workout that includes swimming, I would choose esonstyle because IP68 protection and stored MP3 playback directly address underwater use. I would accept the need to load music in advance and switch modes before getting in the water.
For travel, translation, and longer stated battery life, I would choose MINISO instead. My overall workout pick is esonstyle, but only for buyers whose priority is sport or swimming rather than app-based translation.
FAQ
No. The product instructions say Bluetooth is not supported underwater because water can interfere with the signal. Switch to MP3 mode and listen to audio stored on its 8GB memory.
No waterproof rating is provided for the MINISO MS105. Its listed features focus on translation, in-ear listening, calls, and Bluetooth, so I would not choose it for swimming.
MINISO lists up to 60 hours of battery life, while esonstyle lists eight hours. Those figures make MINISO the stronger fit if stated playback duration is the priority; esonstyle is designed around different needs, including underwater MP3 playback.
The provided specifications do not list volume limiting for either product. esonstyle uses bone conduction, but that alone does not establish that it has a volume-limiting function.
• philips Over vs EarAccord Open Ear wrap: Wrap Around Earbuds
• Anker Life P2 vs Soundcore P20i
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.